Artines donia Medeiros & Carneiro, 2019

Medeiros, Adalberto Dantas De, Dolibaina, Diego Rodrigo, Carneiro, Eduardo, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik & Casagrande, Mirna Martins, 2019, Taxonomic revision of Artines Godman, 1901 (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae: Moncini) with the description of nine new species, Zootaxa 4614 (1), pp. 1-49 : 37-40

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4614.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4D7A4B93-7C52-4EF9-92A7-46CA81A1DEC7

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10447898

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5EA37EFE-671F-4C96-B8B5-130B435F3922

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:5EA37EFE-671F-4C96-B8B5-130B435F3922

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Artines donia Medeiros & Carneiro
status

sp. nov.

Artines donia Medeiros & Carneiro sp. nov.

Figs 18 View FIGURES 14–19 , 25 View FIGURES 21–26 , 40 View FIGURES 40–41 , 53, 80

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:5EA37EFE-671F-4C96-B8B5-130B435F3922

Diagnosis. Artines donia sp. nov. differs from the species of the “ aquilina group” in the following characters: ventral hind wing with central black spot wider than long; uncus distally wide, without ventral projection, apex weakly bifid; valva distally rhomboid; aedeagus uniformly wide; ventral projection of aedeagus with distal portion bifid; cornutus similar to A. focus and A. cofus sp. nov., differing in being more sclerotized and having spines slightly conspicuous; fultura inferior robust and laterally wider than in the other species of the “ aquilina group”.

Description. Male ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 14–19 A–B). Head: antenna with nudum bearing 12 segments.

Forewing length: 14 mm.

Dorsal forewing ( Fig. 18A View FIGURES 14–19 ): two apical spots in R 4 –R 5 and R 5 –M 1; discal spots as in A. aquilina ; white spot in CuA 2 –2A very conspicuous, triangular; brand shorter than in other species of the “ aquilina group”, with lower projection long and upper projection uniformly narrow and with apex rounded.

Ventral forewing ( Fig. 18B View FIGURES 14–19 ): apical and discal spots as in A. aquilina ; submarginal band as in A. cofus sp. nov.; white spot broad and strongly marked in CuA 2 –2A.

Ventral hind wing ( Fig. 18B View FIGURES 14–19 ): apical portion of discal cell densely covered by orange scales; central black spot rectangular, wider than long; postdiscal band yellow, limited distally by wavy dark brown stripe.

Genitalia ( Figs 40 View FIGURES 40–41 A–L, 53): tegumen more or less oval, longer than wide ( Fig. 40C View FIGURES 40–41 ), in lateral view, rectangular, dorsal margin straight on its entire stretch ( Fig. 40A View FIGURES 40–41 ). Saccus narrowed medially, anterior portion narrower than tegumen, proximal margin rounded ( Fig. 40B View FIGURES 40–41 ). Uncus shorter than tegumen, proximal 1/2 with lateral margins slightly concave and distally divergent, distal 1/2 narrower with strong lateral concavity, distal end weakly bifid ( Fig. 40C View FIGURES 40–41 ), little curved ventrally ( Fig. 40A View FIGURES 40–41 ). Gnathos in ventral view reaching 1/2 of uncus, arms parallel with distal ends straight ( Fig. 40D View FIGURES 40–41 ), curved dorsally toward distal end of uncus ( Fig. 40A View FIGURES 40–41 ). Valva three times longer than wide; costa narrow and triangular, laterally projected inwards, separated from ampulla by distance shorter than its length; harpe longer than 1/2 valva, widened from base; ampulla 1/2 width of median portion of harpe, dorsally protruding, slightly exceeding dorsal margin of valva; distal projection of valva wide, with thorn-like projection on dorsal-distal portion ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 40–41 E–F). Aedeagus uniformly wide, weakly curved dorsally; opening of ejaculatory bulb dorsal near proximal margin of aedeagus; ventral projection diverging from aedeagus at an angled of 45 degrees, distal portion asymmetrically bifid ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 40–41 G–J). Cornutus uniformly sclerotized, bearing setae-like spines at base of vesica ( Figs 40M View FIGURES 40–41 , 53). Fultura inferior robust, in lateral view wider than in the other species of the group ( Fig. 40L View FIGURES 40–41 ).

Female. Unknown.

Variation. The specimen from Goiás, Brazil, is paler than the specimen from Rondônia, which may be due to the fact that the wing is worn.

Comments. Collor pattern as in A. focus , A. angelica sp. nov. and A. cofus sp. nov., differing in the central black spot of the ventral hind wing more reduced and wider than long. The male genitalia are similar to A. focus and A. cofus sp. nov., from which it differs in the following characters: uncus slightly bifid, without ventral projection, aedeagus uniformly wide, fultura inferior robust and valva distally not pointed, with projection similar to a distally projected thorn.

Geographic distribution ( Fig. 80 View FIGURE 80 ). It is only known from the southern Brazilian Amazon Rainforest. BRA- ZIL— Rondônia: Vilhena. Goiás: Santa Rita do Araguaia. Temporal distribution. This species occurs in May and July. Host plant. Unknown. Etymology. The term “ donia ” is the termination of the word “ Rondônia ”, the type locality of the species. Type material. Holotype male deposited at the DZUP with the following labels: / HOLOTYPUS / Vilhena, RO [ndônia, Brazil], 10.VII.1972, Mielke leg. / gen. prep. A. Medeiros 2017 / DZ 41.283 / Holotypus Artines donia Medeiros & Carneiro det. 2018 /

. Paratype: BRAZIL— Goiás: Santa Rita do Araguaia, 1 male, 21.V.1969, Brown leg., OM 66.000 (OM).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Lepidoptera

Family

Hesperiidae

Genus

Artines

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF