Neophasis oculata (Chubrik, 1966)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.05.001 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CB7C1671-006A-FFF5-706D-E49A7BC0F80A |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Neophasis oculata |
status |
|
3.3.3. Sexual adults of Neophasis oculata View in CoL ( Fig. 5G View Fig )
Locality: White Sea; Keret Archipelago (Kandalaksha Bay).
Host: Shorthorn sculpin Myoxocephalus scorpius .
Other reported hosts: 40 fish species (summarized in Bray and Gibson, 1991).
Sites: Pyloric ceca, intestine.
Prevalence: 44% (27 of 61).
Intensity (range of values, mean and standard error of the mean): 1–183 (12.9 ± 8.70).
Vouchers: Hologenophore VG 5.2 (isolate 2) and paragenophores (NO002, NO003) corresponding to isolates No 2 and 3 deposited in the collection of the Department of Invertebrate Zoology of Saint Petersburg University .
Description: Measurements in Table 3.
Remarks: We found sexual adults of N. oculata in M. scorpius in the White Sea throughout the observation period. Ovigerous specimens were detected mostly in July. The most common infection site was
165
IB-VS. Distance from intestinal bifurcation to anterior margin of ventral sucker. Vit-VS. Distance from anterior-most extent of vitelline fields to anterior margin of ventral sucker
VS-Ovary.Distance from posterior margin of ventral sucker to anterior margin of ovary.
PTR. Length of post-testicular region.
C-PE. Distance from posterior-most extent of the intestinal caeca to posterior extremity of worm.
pyloric ceca. In heavily infected fish, the worms were also found in the other regions of the digestive tract such as the stomach, the midgut and the hindgut.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.