Euseboides plagiatus Gahan, 1893
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3964.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2745525B-4C6B-4816-B817-0F56E0D59CDE |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6111047 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CC1D857E-3A72-FF96-DBB0-BEC5CB29FD56 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Euseboides plagiatus Gahan, 1893 |
status |
|
Euseboides plagiatus Gahan, 1893 View in CoL
( Figures 70–74 View FIGURES 70 – 74 )
Euseboides plagiatus Gahan, 1893: 386 View in CoL (type locality: “Mungphu, Sikkim, India ”), pl. XIX, fig. 6; Aurivillius 1921: 218 (catalogue); Löbl & Smetana 2010: 223 (catalogue).
Type specimens examined. Holotype: gender unknown ( BMNH), Euseboides plagiatus , Type, Gahan (handwriting on a rectangular white label in black ink)/ Atkinson., Coll., 92-3. (printed on a rectangular white label in black ink)/ Mungphu. (printed on a rectangular white label in black ink)/ Type (printed on a circular white label with circular red border in black ink).
Distribution. India: Sikkim (Mungphu).
Comments. Kano (1928) cited the paper of Aurivillius using the year “1922”. However, the senior author found the paper was actually published in 1921, so the correct year is 1921. Kano (1928) redescribed this species briefly in Japanese and reported this species from China ( Taiwan) for the first time, however, Gressitt (1951) treated the species reported by Kano (1928) as E. matsudai .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Euseboides plagiatus Gahan, 1893
Huang, Gui-Qiang, Li, Zhu & Chen, Li 2015 |
Euseboides plagiatus
Lobl 2010: 223 |
Aurivillius 1921: 218 |
Gahan 1893: 386 |