Belostoma elongatum Montandon, 1908
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1477.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:40401BCD-C731-44C4-9E01-A96FB3F8DF51 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CC39AC46-C132-7E49-FF66-1537FBAB9E0E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Belostoma elongatum Montandon, 1908 |
status |
|
Belostoma elongatum Montandon, 1908 View in CoL
( Figs 7M–P View FIGURE 7 ; 19A View FIGURE 19 ; 23B View FIGURE 23 )
Belostoma elongatum Montandon View in CoL apud Lauck, 1962: 299.
Belostoma boscii: De Carlo, 1930: 112 View in CoL , plate V ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ), plate VII (Figs 27–28).
Types.—According to Lauck (1962) and Schnack (1976), B. elongatum View in CoL was described based on syntypes (Asunción and Apa River, Paraguay) deposited, respectively, in HNHM and MIZT. These specimens have not been examined.
Material examined.— ARGENTINA. 1 m / 1 f ( HMHN): Chaco, Resistencia –“nr. P-B 313”, “Hungariin Soil-zool. Exp.”, 23.XII.1965, ([?] Mahunka), J. R. I. Ribeiro det. 1999. *1 f ( MZSP): Salta, Tartagal , XII.1961, (A. Martinez), J. R. I. Ribeiro det. 1999. BRAZIL. Mato Grosso — 3 m ( MNRJ 96 View Materials ): Cáceres , 02.XII.1955, (M. Alvarenga), J. A. de Carlo det. * 1 m ( MNRJ 95 View Materials ): same, I.1941, (“ Pass’i ” [?]), J. A. de Carlo det. 1 m ( DPIC 3221 View Materials ): Cuiabá, Coxipó , 12.X.1988, (U. M. Bezerra), A. L. Melo det. * 2 m / 3 f ( MNRJ 93 View Materials ): Urucum , I.1955, (“ Comissão I. O. Cruz ”), J. A. de Carlo det. Mato Grosso do Sul — * 1 m ( DPIC 567 View Materials ): Corumbá , 17.XI.1992, (Fabiana [?] and T. P. S. Sereno), J. R. I. Ribeiro det. 1999. 5 m / 5 f ( MNRJ 90 View Materials ): Salobra , I.1955, (“ Comissão I. O. Cruz ”), J. A. de Carlo det. * 2 f ( SEMC): same, I.1955, (C. A. Camargo [this specimen has been exchanged with P. F. S. Pereira]), J. R. I. Ribeiro det. 1999. Minas Gerais — *1 f ( DPIC 419 View Materials ): Belo Horizonte, Pampulha Lake , 16.XII.1991, (A. L. Melo), N. Nieser det. 1 f ( DPIC 201 View Materials ): Lagoa Santa , 10.III.1990, (A. Pelli), A. L. Melo det. Piauí — 1 f ( MNRJ 94 View Materials ): Teresina , I.1960, (O. Fontoura and C. S. Ferreira), J. R. I. Ribeiro det. 1999. Rondônia — *1 f ( MZSP): Príncipe da Beira , 19.XI–03.XII.1967, (G. R. Kloss), J. R. I. Ribeiro det. 1999. PARAGUAY. * 1 m ( MZSP): Puerto Casado , XII.1958, ([?] Martinez), J. R. I. Ribeiro det. 1999.
Distribution.— ARGENTINA: Buenos Aires ( De Carlo 1930), Catamarca ( De Carlo 1930), Chaco ( De Carlo 1930), Corrientes ( De Carlo 1930), Entre Ríos ( De Carlo 1930), Mendoza ( Lauck 1962), Misiones ( Lauck 1962), Salta (new record), Santa Fe ( Lauck 1962), Santiago del Estero ( Lauck 1962). BOLIVIA: Roboré ( Lauck 1962), Santa Cruz ( Lauck 1962), Pando ( Lauck 1962) [as “Chiquitos”]. BRAZIL: Mato Grosso (new record), Mato Grosso do Sul (new record), Minas Gerais (new record in southeastern Brazil), Piauí (new record), Rio Grande do Sul ( Lanzer 1976), Rondônia (new record). COLOMBIA ( De Carlo 1930). COSTA RICA ( De Carlo 1930). CUBA ( De Carlo 1930). DOMINICAN REPUBLIC: Santo Domingo ( De Carlo 1930). GUATEMALA ( De Carlo 1930). GUYANAS [?] ( De Carlo 1930). MÉXICO ( De Carlo 1930). PANAMA ( De Carlo 1930). PARAGUAY: Asunción ( De Carlo 1930), Central ( Lauck 1962), Guairá ( Lauck
1962), Paraguari ( Lauck 1962), Puerto Casado (new record). PERU: Junín ( Lauck 1962). URUGUAY ( De Carlo 1930): Artigas ( Ruffinelli & Pirán 1959), Canelones ( Ruffinelli & Pirán 1959), Montevideo ( Ruffinelli & Pirán 1959), Rivera ( Ruffinelli & Pirán 1959), Sierra de Mahoma ( Lauck 1962) [as “ San José ”], Treinta y Tres ( Ruffinelli & Pirán 1959).
Description.—Measurements (m / f). Total length (from apex of head to apex of hemelytra at rest) 33.3– 38.4 / 36.7–40.9; largest width of body 13.8–15.3 / 14.4–15.5; median length of pronotum 5.86–6.86 / 6.14– 6.79; greatest pronotal width 10.29–11.57 / 10.71–11.86.
General coloration yellowish brown. Anterior portion of pronotum usually with two dark longitudinal stripes, each parallel to lateral borders.
Body elongate and strongly straight. Length of anteoculus 1.03–1.37 times length of interoculus; length of rostral segment I 1.11–1.41 times length of segment II; anterior frontogenal suture usually longer than posterior frontogenal suture; clypeus not reaching ocular line (0.14–0.43 mm); vertex without ongitudinal median carina; posterior interocular width 1.00–1.17 times length of anteoculus, and 1.11–1.57 times width of eye; eyes rounded. Posterior part of pronotum occasionally with longitudinal median carina; greatest pronotal width 1.69–1.81 times its length; scutellum reaching nodal line, occasionally with weakly longitudinal median carina; prosternal keel prominent, somewhat rounded at apex ( Fig. 7M View FIGURE 7 ). Pilosity not extending along genital operculum, usually covering about half of connexivum.
Male genitalia ( Fig. 7N–P View FIGURE 7 ).—Dorsal arms anteriorly broad, narrowing gradually toward apex in dorsal view; ventral diverticulum with dorsal caudal protuberance in dorsal and lateral views, and with developed ventroapical protuberance in lateral and ventral views; caudal lateral margins of ventral diverticulum sinuous in ventral view; width of ventral diverticulum about 1.3 times its length in ventral view.
Comparative notes.—As defined by De Carlo (1930, 1938) and Schnack (1976), in B. elongatum the anteoculus and interoculus are subequal. As argued by Lauck (1962), and based on results herein reported, these structures may be subequal in some specimens, but this may be the result of imprecise measurements (A. L. Melo, pers. comm.). Thus, this character cannot be considered diagnostic for this species. As mentioned by Lauck (1962), it would appear that this is a species complex.
The specimens studied by Lauck (1962) and Schnack (1973, 1976) agree with the specimens studied here, which possess the greatest pronotal width less than twice its length in the midline. According to De Carlo (1938), B. elongatum has, by contrast, the greatest pronotal width twice its median length (as herein mentioned in the key to B. plebejum , B. micantulum , and B. orbiculatum ), but these measures are suspect, because they appear to be erroneous.
The history of this species is closely linked with that of B. foveolatum . According to Schnack (1976), B. foveolatum differs from B. elongatum by lacking the two dark longitudinal pronotal stripes. Yet B. elongatum specimens studied by De Carlo (1930, 1938) bear two dark longitudinal stripes on the pronotum. However, this structural difference cited by these authors between B. elongatum and B. foveolatum is slight and well within the range of variability found intraspecifically in other species of Belostoma .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Belostoma elongatum Montandon, 1908
Ribeiro, Josė Ricardo Inacio 2007 |
Belostoma elongatum
Lauck, D. R. 1962: 299 |
Belostoma boscii:
De Carlo, J. A. 1930: 112 |