Belostoma bosqi De Carlo, 1932
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1477.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:40401BCD-C731-44C4-9E01-A96FB3F8DF51 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5086707 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CC39AC46-C139-7E44-FF66-101DFD659FB6 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Belostoma bosqi De Carlo, 1932 |
status |
|
Belostoma bosqi De Carlo, 1932 View in CoL
( Figs 4I–P View FIGURE 4 ; 16D View FIGURE 16 ; 22B View FIGURE 22 )
Belostoma bosqi De Carlo, 1932: 125 View in CoL , plate V ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ).
Belostoma bergi: De Carlo 1930: 117 View in CoL , plate V ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ) (not Montandon).
Belostoma bosci: Schnack 1976: 17 .
Types.— Belostoma bosqi View in CoL was described from a male holotype (Chaco Province, Argentina) deposited in MACN and five paratypes also in MACN (Misiones Province, Argentina), MLPA (from [?], Paraguay), and in Pellerano’s collection (Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul ). According to Lauck (1964), there are two females (Santo Tomé, Corrientes Province, Argentina) deposited in SEMC, labelled, and determined as paratypes by De Carlo. These specimens have not been examined .
Material examined.— BRAZIL. Amazonas — *1 f ( INPA 0020983 View Materials ): [without a more precise locality], 16. V.1976, (I. S. Gorayeb), J. R. I. Ribeiro det. 1999, [at light]. *1 f ( INPA 0020941 View Materials ): Manaus , 25. VI.1976, ([?] Nilce), J. R. I. Ribeiro det. 1999. 2 m ( MNRJ 167 View Materials ): same, Negro River , 08–24.VII.1941, (Parko [?]), J. C. M. Carvalho det. 1952. Mato Grosso — 1 m ( MZSP): S. [?] Domingo , XI.1949, ([?] Werner), J. R. I. Ribeiro det. 1999. Mato Grosso do Sul — * 2 m / 1 f ( DZRJ 25 ): Corumbá, Popular Nova , 06.II.1997, (J. R. I. Ribeiro), J. R. I. Ribeiro det. 1999. * 2 m / 4 f ( SEMC): Salobra , I.1955, (C. A. Camargo), J. R. I. Ribeiro det. 1999, [“exch. P. F. S. Pereira ”]. Minas Gerais — * 2 m / 1 f ( DPIC): Paracatu [point II], 04. VI.1991, (A. C. Faria), J. R. I. Ribeiro det. 1999. * 1 m ( DPIC): same, 03. VI.1991, (A. C. Faria), J. R. I. Ribeiro det. 1999. * 1 m ( DPIC 3232 View Materials ): Sete Lagoas , 18.XI.1960, (M. A. R. Oliveira), J. R. I. Ribeiro det. 1999. Rondônia — * 1 m ( INPA 0020940 View Materials ): Porto Velho , 30.IV.1979, (J. Campbell), J. R. I. Ribeiro det. 1999. São Paulo — 1 m ( AMNH): Cosmópolis , 25.I.1974, (J. G. Rozen, F. C. Thompson, and J. S. Moure), J. R. I. Ribeiro det. 1999.
Distribution.— ARGENTINA: Chaco ( De Carlo 1930), Corrientes ( Lauck 1964), Misiones ( De Carlo 1932). BOLIVIA: Pando ( Lauck 1964) [as “Chiquitos”], Santa Cruz ( Lauck 1964). PARAGUAY ( De Carlo 1930): Central ( Lauck 1964). BRAZIL: Amazonas ( Nieser 1975), Goiás ( Menke & Lauck 1962), Mato Grosso ( Lauck 1964), Mato Grosso do Sul ( De Carlo 1930), Minas Gerais (new record in southeastern Brazil), Rondônia (new record), São Paulo (new record in southeastern Brazil), Tocantins ( Lauck 1964) [as Goiás-Ilha do Bananal]. PERU: Huánuco ( Lauck 1964), Ucayali ( Lauck 1964) [as “Aguaytía]. SURINAM: Marowijne ( Nieser 1975), Moengo Rio Cottica ( Lauck 1964). VENEZUELA: Portuguesa ( Lauck 1964).
Description.—Measurements (m / f). Total length (from apex of head to apex of hemelytra at rest) 20.4– 25.3 / 19.2–24.4; largest width of body 9.5–12.5 / 9.0–11.5; median length of pronotum 2.65–3.42 / 2.65– 3.33; greatest pronotal width 6.00–7.58 / 5.60–7.08.
General coloration yellowish brown. Longitudinal median yellowish or whitish stripe on pronotum and scutellum; two lateral stripes on pronotum only.
Body flattened and strongly elliptical, lateral borders of thorax aligned to anterior borders of abdomen. Length of anteoculus 0.83–1.00 time length of interoculus; length of rostral segment I 1.11–1.27 times length of segment II; anterior frontogenal suture equal to longer than posterior frontogenal suture; clypeus reaching or not reaching ocular line (0–0.17 mm); vertex without longitudinal median carina; posterior interocular width 1.20–1.44 times length of anteoculus, and 1.36–1.57 times width of eye; eyes triangular. Pronotum without longitudinal median carina; pronotum at widest point width 2.07–2.36 times its length; scutellum not reaching nodal line (0.40–1.40 mm), with weakly longitudinal median carina; prosternal keel prominent, slightly acute and anteriorly projected at apex ( Fig. 4I View FIGURE 4 ). Pilosity not extending along genital operculum, covering about one-third of connexivum.
Male genitalia ( Fig. 4K–M View FIGURE 4 ).—Dorsal arms weakly convergent, strongly acute at apex in dorsal view; ventral diverticulum without dorsal caudal protuberance in dorsal and lateral views, and without ventroapical protuberance in lateral and ventral views; caudal lateral margins of ventral diverticulum with some sinuosity in ventral view; width of ventral diverticulum equal to its length in ventral view.
Variation.—In a specimen from the State of Minas Gerais the prosternal keel is sinuous and truncated at its apex ( Fig. 4J View FIGURE 4 ). Another specimen has the anterior portion of the phallus slightly broader and with dorsal arms shorter and larger in dorsal view, surpassing the dorsal caudal margin of the ventral diverticulum ( Fig. 4N–P View FIGURE 4 ).
Comparative notes.—As suggested above, it seems certain that the longitudinal median carina on the vertex of B. bergi and B. bosqi is a case of intraspecific variation. However, Schnack (1973, 1976) did not mention the presence of a longitudinal median carina on the vertex of B. bosqi , although this was mentioned by De Carlo (1930, 1932, 1938) and Nieser (1975).
MACN |
Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia |
SEMC |
University of Kansas - Biodiversity Institute |
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
VI |
Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute |
MZSP |
Sao Paulo, Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo |
DPIC |
Belo Horizonte, Instituto de Ciencias Biologicas |
AMNH |
American Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Belostoma bosqi De Carlo, 1932
Ribeiro, Josė Ricardo Inacio 2007 |
Belostoma bosci: Schnack 1976: 17
Schnack, J. A. 1976: 17 |
Belostoma bosqi
De Carlo, J. A. 1932: 125 |
Belostoma bergi: De Carlo 1930: 117
De Carlo, J. A. 1930: 117 |