Kiekie sarapiqui, Polotow & Brescovit, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4531.3.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5C9DBCCE-E371-4755-BE8C-CCB0B1C9940A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5989731 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CD2F878C-8050-FF89-FF69-66D2CA7CFE1B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Kiekie sarapiqui |
status |
sp. nov. |
Kiekie sarapiqui View in CoL new species
Figs 3A View FIGURE 3 , 8 View FIGURE 8 , 15B View FIGURE 15
Type material. Male holotype from Costa Rica, Heredia Province, Puerto Viejo de Sarapiquí (10.45, -84.01), 4.VIII.1965, F. Coyle coll., deposited in MCZ 79099. Female paratype from Costa Rica, Heredia Province, Puerto Viejo de Sarapiquí (10.45, -84.01), 2.I.1991, P.R. Graig coll., deposited in CAS.
Etymology. The species name is a toponym in apposition referring to the type locality.
Diagnosis. Males of Kiekie sarapiqui ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 A–B) resemble those of K. sinuatipes ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 A–B) by the shape of the embolus and RTA, but can be distinguished by the shorter and wider median apophysis and narrower conductor. Females of Kiekie sarapiqui ( Fig. 8C View FIGURE 8 ) also resemble those of K. sinuatipes ( Fig. 5C View FIGURE 5 ), but can be distinguished by the shape of the epigynum, with longer median field and shorter lateral projection of the lateral fields. Internally, the copulatory ducts of Kiekie sarapiqui ( Fig. 8D View FIGURE 8 ) fold over itself before they connect to the spermathecae, while in K. sinuatipes ( Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5 ) they exhibit a twist, not covering the spermathecae.
Description. Male (MCZ 79099). Total length 22.60. Carapace 11.40 long and 9.00 wide. Clypeus 0.30 high. Eye diameters: AME 0.35, ALE 0.32, PME 0.37, PLE 0.37. Leg measurements: I: absent; II: femur 14.50/ patella 5.60/ tibia 14.80/ metatarsus 13.00/ tarsus 3.90/ total 51.80; III: 12.70/ 4.70/ 11.50/ 13.20/ 3.80/ 45.90; IV: 15.30/ 4.90/ 14.70/ 17.20/ 4.50/ 56.60. Leg spination: tibia II v2-2 -2-2-2, r1-1-0, p1-1-1-0, III and IV v2-2 -2, r1-1, p1-1; metatarsus II v2-2 -2, r1-1-0, p-1-1-0, III v2-2 -2, r1-1-1, p1-1-1, IV v2-1 -1-2, r1-1, p1-1 ( Fig. 3A View FIGURE 3 ). Palp ( Figs 8 View FIGURE 8 A– B): RTA spine-shaped, slightly curved forward; embolus elongated and laminar, with a large base, narrowing in the middle to the tip; conductor with narrow base and large apex, covering the tip of embolus.
Female (CAS). Total length 19.60. Carapace 10.00 long and 5.90 wide. Clypeus 0.50 high. Eye diameters: AME 0.30, ALE 0.25, PME 0.40, PLE 0.40. Legs measurements: I: femur 8.10/ patella 3.90/ tibia 7.50/ metatarsus 6.40/ tarsus 2.20/ total 28.10; II: 7.60/ 3.90/ 6.40/ 6.00/ 2.40/ 26.30; III: 6.60/ 3.20/ 5.20/ 5.70/ 2.20/ 22.90; IV: 8.40/ 3.50/ 7.90/ 9.00/ 2.70/ 31.50. Leg formula 4123. Leg spination: tibia I and II v2-2 -2-2-2, r0, p0, III and IV v2- 2 -2, r1-1, p1-1; metatarsus I, II v2-2 -2, r0, p0, III v2-2 -2, r1-1, p1-1, IV v1-1 -1-2-2, r1-1, p1-1. Epigynum ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 C–D): median field subpentagonal; lateral fields with large hyaline projection; lateral projections elongated; copulatory ducts laminar and elongated, with one loop; spermathecae bean-shaped and elongated; fertilization ducts small.
Additional material examined. None.
Distribution. Costa Rica, Heredia Province ( Fig. 15B View FIGURE 15 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.