Otacilia subkomurai, Mu & Jin & Zhang, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5134.2.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:80228D23-3181-4B6F-842F-3956D6459ECC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6534919 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CD43878C-FFF0-FE2C-FF42-FE95FDD2F856 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Otacilia subkomurai |
status |
sp. nov. |
Otacilia subkomurai View in CoL sp. nov. (Ű叉ṀÞffifl)
Figs 10E–F View FIGURE 10 , 15 View FIGURE 15 , 16 View FIGURE 16
Type material. Holotype ♂: CHINA: Hubei Province: Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture , Badong County, Yesan’guan Town , the mountain behind Three Gorges distillery (37°30’44.21”N, 110°19’55.33”E, 1203 m elev.), 24 Mar. 2014, leg. Luyu Wang. GoogleMaps
Paratypes: 1♂ 8♀, same data as holotype GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The species is named for its similarity to Otacilia komurai (Yaginuma, 1952) .
Diagnosis. This new species resembles O. komurai by having a crescent-shaped embolus and a similarly shaped bulb (see Figs 15C View FIGURE 15 , 16C View FIGURE 16 and fig. 3G in Wang et al. 2012), but the male can be distinguished by the long and clavate shaped TA (vs absent, compare Fig. 16C View FIGURE 16 with fig. 3G in Wang et al. 2012) and the triangular tip of the conductor (vs the round tip, compare Fig. 16B–C View FIGURE 16 with fig. 3F–G in Wang et al. 2012). The female can be distinguished by the short connecting tube (vs long, compare Figs 15E–F View FIGURE 15 , 16E–F View FIGURE 16 with fig. 3H–I in Wang et al. 2012).
Description. Male: total length 2.76–3.00 (n=2). Holotype ( Fig. 10E View FIGURE 10 ): total length 3.00, carapace 1.55 long, 1.30 wide (CW); abdomen 1.45 long, 0.98 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.10, ALE 0.10, PME 0.08, PLE 0.10; AME–AME 0.04, AME–ALE 0.01, ALE–ALE 0.23, PME–PME 0.12, PME–PLE 0.06, PLE–PLE 0.39, ALE–PLE 0.08. Eye area 0.51 wide (EAW), cephalic region 0.71 wide (CRW), EAW/CRW 0.72. CRW/CW 0.55. MOA 0.23 long, anterior width 0.23, posterior width 0.30. Clypeal height 0.13 ( CH), CH /AME 1.30. Chelicerae with three promarginal and five retromarginal teeth. Carapace yellow, with broad longitudinal gray band, slightly broader than eye area. Abdomen oval, gray, with small dorsal scutum anteriorly, two triangular black spots alongside scutum, and four black chevron stripes posteriorly ( Fig. 10E View FIGURE 10 ).
Palp as in Figs 15A–D View FIGURE 15 , 16A–D View FIGURE 16 . FA strongly raised, located at middle part. RTA moderate in length and flakeshaped, strongly curved towards cymbium, with blunt tip, several short setae at base ( Fig. 15B–D View FIGURE 15 ) and small basal apophysis retrolaterally in dorsal view ( Fig. 16D View FIGURE 16 ). Tegulum diamond-shaped. TA thin and long, tip curved towards cymbium ( Fig. 16C View FIGURE 16 ). Sperm duct tapering to embolus. Embolus hook-shaped, with wide base. Conductor thick, tip triangular, about half length of embolus.
Female: total length 3.41–4.18 (n=8). One paratype ( Fig. 10F View FIGURE 10 ) total length 4.18, carapace 1.63 long, 1.42 wide (CW); abdomen 2.55 long, 1.72 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.10, ALE 0.10, PME 0.09, PLE 0.10; AME – AME 0.04, AME – ALE 0.01, ALE – ALE 0.23, PME – PME 0.10, PME – PLE 0.05, PLE – PLE 0.37, ALE – PLE 0.07. Eye area 0.51 wide (EAW), cephalic region 0.72 wide (CRW), EAW/CRW 0.71. CRW/CW 0.51. MOA 0.23 long, anterior width 0.22, posterior width 0.28. Other characters as for male, except lack of dorsal scutum, heavier color and slightly larger body size ( Fig. 10F View FIGURE 10 ) .
Epigyne as in Figs 15E–F View FIGURE 15 , 16E–F View FIGURE 16 . Epigynal plate with pair of shallow depressions at middle part. Median septum long ( Fig. 15E View FIGURE 15 ). Copulatory openings located at middle of depressions, separated by about 1.5 times spermatheca diameter. Bursa oval, large. Copulatory ducts short and thick. Connecting tube longer than CD, strongly curved. Spermathecae small, oval, close to each other.
Measurements of legs:
Spination of legs:
Distribution. China (Hubei Province).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |