Thagria digitata Li
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3918.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:14FD40D0-1D41-461A-B5E6-02FD4F996266 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5261474 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CD5187C4-E32A-FFC3-B89D-FB7177B9FED6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Thagria digitata Li |
status |
|
Thagria digitata Li View in CoL
( Figs. 85–96 View FIGURES 85 – 96 )
Thagria digitata Li 1989: 1 View in CoL –2, Figs. 1–5 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURES 2 – 5 ; Li & Wang 1991: 119, Fig. 62 View FIGURES 60 – 69 , original; Li 1993: 31; Zhang 1994: 33 –34, Fig. 27 View FIGURES 26 – 37 ; Nielson 2013: 85 View Cited Treatment
Distribution. China (Guangxi, Shaanxi, Sichuan, Hubei, Hunan, Guizhou, Yunnan, Guangdong, Hainan); Vietnam.
Material examined. 5♂ 2♀, CHINA: Yunnan, Xishuangbanna, Menglun, 20 Oct. 1992, coll. Li Zizhong; 6♂ 1♀, CHINA: Hunan, Zhangjiajie, 9 Aug. 2001, coll. Chen Xiangsheng; 1♂, Guangdong, Nanling, 4 Aug. 2006, coll. Yang Zaihua; 5♂ 1♀, CHINA: Guangxi, Damingshan, 22 July 2007, coll. Zhang Yubo & Meng Zehong; 1♂, CHINA: Hainan, Diaoluoshan, 10 April 2009, coll. Yang Zaihua. 1♂, CHINA: Guangxi, Guilin, Yinshuo, 21 April 2009, coll. Chen Yong; 16♂ 3♀, CHINA: Sichuan, Mianyang, Chaping, 19–22 July 2010, coll. Zhang Pei, Chang Zhimin & Li Kebin; 2♂, CHINA: Shaanxi, Shiquan, Houliu, 2–3 Aug. 2010, coll. Zhang Pei; 13♂ 4♀, CHINA: Guizhou, Kuankuoshui, 11–17 Aug. 2010, coll. Li Yujian, Zheng Weibin, Fan Zhihua & Dai Renhuai; 1♂ 1♀, CHINA: Guangdong, Nankunshan, 24 Aug. 2010, coll. Li Hu & Li Yujian; 7♂, CHINA: Guizhou, Leigongshan, 8–11 July 2011, coll. Zheng Weibin & Long Jiankun; 16♂ 7♀, CHINA: Sichuan, Emeishan, 2 Aug. 2012, coll. Fan Zhihua, Li Hu, Jiao Meng & Li Juan; 9♂ 3♀, CHINA: Guizhou, Xingyi, Ceheng, 25–26 Aug. 2012, coll. Zheng Weibin, Xing Dongliang & Long Jiankun; 2♂, CHINA: Hubei, Wudangshan, 13 July 2013, coll. Li Hu ( GUGC).
Variation. Based on the examined specimens, the paraphysis has the basal digitate process, subapical process and apex always curved toward the same side, but some specimens are mirror images of others ( Figs. 92, 93, 95, 96 View FIGURES 85 – 96 ).
Remarks. This species was described from the holotype (male) and three female paratypes from GUGC. It is similar to T. multipars (Walker, 1858) in external appearance, but differs in having the paraphysis excavated subapically with two processes ( Figs. 92, 95 View FIGURES 85 – 96 ). In T. multipars the paraphysis has one process basally, tapered to apex ( Figs. 147, 150 View FIGURES 140 – 152 ) and the ventral processes of segment X are shorter than the pygofer processes in T. digitata ( Fig. 90 View FIGURES 85 – 96 ) and longer in T. multipars ( Fig. 145 View FIGURES 140 – 152 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Thagria digitata Li
Fan, Zhi-Hua, Li, Zi-Zhong & Dai, Ren-Huai 2015 |