Thagria paramultipars Fan & Li
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3918.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:14FD40D0-1D41-461A-B5E6-02FD4F996266 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5261489 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CD5187C4-E32F-FFC4-B89D-F89277C7FB23 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Thagria paramultipars Fan & Li |
status |
sp. nov. |
Thagria paramultipars Fan & Li View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs. 164–190 View FIGURES 164 – 175 View FIGURES 176 – 190 )
Description. Body length of male 8.5–8.8 mm, female 10.0 mm.
Body large, robust ( Figs. 164 View FIGURES 164 – 175 , 176 View FIGURES 176 – 190 ). Crown brown to dark, with one transverse ivory band medially; ocelli and eyes brown ( Figs. 166 View FIGURES 164 – 175 , 178 View FIGURES 176 – 190 ). Face with clypeus with three brown bands, anterior band narrowest, middle widest, distal longest crossing lora and genae; clypellus apex brown, remainder of face yellow ( Figs. 167 View FIGURES 164 – 175 , 179 View FIGURES 176 – 190 ). Pronotum suffused with light brown (male) or ivory yellow (female) nubs and traversed by three bands, from base to apex black, ivory yellow, brown ( Figs. 166 View FIGURES 164 – 175 , 178 View FIGURES 176 – 190 ). Mesonotum yellow to brown, with black spots near middle ( Figs. 166 View FIGURES 164 – 175 , 178 View FIGURES 176 – 190 ). Forewing brown to dark, with transparent ivory spots, venation black with orange spots ( Figs. 164, 165 View FIGURES 164 – 175 , 176, 177 View FIGURES 176 – 190 ).
Head with anterior margin rounded, crown broad, wider than eye width, produced distally about 1/4 distance beyond anterior margin of eyes, coronal suture evident, about 2/3 of median length, disk depressed ( Figs. 166 View FIGURES 164 – 175 , 178 View FIGURES 176 – 190 ). Face with clypeus long, lateral margins slightly convex; clypellus short, base broad, inflated (male) or slightly inflated (female), wider than clypeus at juncture of clypeal suture in male or as wide as in female, distally constricted, apex arced ( Figs. 167 View FIGURES 164 – 175 , 179 View FIGURES 176 – 190 ). Crown, pronotum and mesonotum midline ratio about 1:1.2:1.7 ( Figs. 166 View FIGURES 164 – 175 , 178 View FIGURES 176 – 190 ). Forewing long, apex rounded, appendix narrowed ( Figs. 164, 165 View FIGURES 164 – 175 , 176, 177 View FIGURES 176 – 190 ).
Male genitalia. Pygofer in lateral view with caudodorsal margin with pair of processes, inner lateral margin serrated in dorsal view ( Figs. 168, 169 View FIGURES 164 – 175 ). Segment X processes not reaching the end of pygofer lobe in lateral view ( Fig. 168 View FIGURES 164 – 175 ). Subgenital plate long and narrow, segmented subbasally, marginal setae fine long ( Fig. 170 View FIGURES 164 – 175 ). Dorsal connective broadly U-shaped, stem absent, rami close to ventral processes of segment X in dorsal view ( Fig. 169 View FIGURES 164 – 175 ). Aedeagus symmetrical, broad basally, tapered distally, extended nearly to middle of paraphysis in dorsal and lateral views ( Figs. 171, 172 View FIGURES 164 – 175 ); paraphysis asymmetrical, broad throughout, only end narrower, with fingerlike spine projecting basally, opposite margin serrated, bifurcated apically, one branch shorter than other in dorsal view ( Figs. 171, 174 View FIGURES 164 – 175 ). Style short, just reaching base of aedeagus, apex with a setalike spine in dorsal and lateral views ( Figs. 171, 173 View FIGURES 164 – 175 ).
Female genitalia. Ovipositor ( Figs. 180–190 View FIGURES 176 – 190 ) as in T. decussata Fan & Dai , sp. nov., but sternite VII anterior margin and caudal margin sunken medially, basal half expanded, apical half narrowed ( Fig. 180 View FIGURES 176 – 190 ).
Type material. Holotype: ♂, CHINA: Guangxi, Longzhou, Nonggang, 8 May 2012, coll. Li Hu ( GUGC). Paratypes: 1 ♂, CHINA: Guangxi, Nanning, 31 May 1995, coll. Yang Maofa; 1 ♂ 1♀, same data as holotype, except coll. Li Hu; 1 ♂, same data as holotype, except coll. Yang Nannan ( GUGC).
Etymology. The species is named for the similarity in general habitus to T. multipars (Walker, 1858) .
Remarks. This species is close to T. multipars (Walker, 1858) , but can be distinguished by the following combination of features: paraphysis bifurcate apically ( Fig. 171 View FIGURES 164 – 175 ), but complete in T. multipars ( Figs. 147, 150 View FIGURES 140 – 152 ); paraphysis broad throughout, lateral margins serrated ( Figs. 171, 174 View FIGURES 164 – 175 ), but in T. multipars broad basally, tapered apically, without serration laterally ( Figs. 147, 150 View FIGURES 140 – 152 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |