Amblyseius herbicolus (Chant)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.24349/acarologia/20214429 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CE5087ED-A819-0924-FE10-F88BFA2FC93E |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Amblyseius herbicolus (Chant) |
status |
|
Amblyseius herbicolus (Chant) View in CoL
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) herbicolus Chant 1959: 84 .
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) herbicolus, Muma 1961: 287 View in CoL .
Typhlodromus herbicolus, Hirschmann 1962: 23 .
Amblyseius herbicolus, Moraes et al. 1986: 14, 1989a: 79 View in CoL , 2004b: 27, Chant & McMurtry
2004: 208, 2007: 78.
Amblyseius impactus Chaudhri 1968: 553 View in CoL (synonymy according to Daneshvar & Denmark
1982).
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) amitae Bhattacharyya 1968: 677 (synonymy according to Denmark
& Muma 1989).
Amblyseius deleoni Muma & Denmark 1970: 68 View in CoL (synonymy according to Daneshvar & Denmark 1982).
Amblyseius giganticus Gupta 1981: 33 View in CoL (synonymy according to Gupta 1986).
Amblyseius (Amblyseialus) thermophilus Karg 1991: 12 View in CoL (synonymy according to ElBanhawy
& Knapp 2011).
Like the two previous species, A. herbicolus belongs also to the largoensis species group and to the largoensis species subgroup ( Chant and McMurtry 2004).
Amblyseius herbicolus View in CoL is widespread in all tropical and subtropical regions of the world. It is the second most abundant phytoseiid mites on Coffea arabica View in CoL L. in Brazil, associated with Brevipalpus phoenicis (Geijskes) View in CoL , vector of the coffee ring spot virus and it was found to be an efficient predator ( Reis et al. 2007). Amblyseius herbicolus View in CoL is also found associated with the broad mite, P. latus , in crops such as chili pepper ( Capsicum annuum View in CoL L.) in Brazil and has also a good potential for controlling the pest. RodriguezCruz et al. (2013) had studied biological, reproductive and life table parameters of A. herbicolus View in CoL on three different diets: broad mites, castor bean pollen ( Ricinus communis View in CoL L.) and sun hemp pollen ( Crotalaria juncea View in CoL L.). The predator was able to develop and reproduce on all these three diets. However, its intrinsic growth rate was higher on broad mites and castor bean pollen. Feeding on alternative food such as pollen can facilitate the predator’s mass rearing and maintain its population on crops when prey is absent or scarce. Many polyphagous generalist phytoseiid mites are important natural enemies because they can feed on plant provided pollen and various prey species, and thus persist in crops even in the absence of target pests ( McMurtry et al. 2013). Hence, populations of these predators can be established in a crop by providing alternative food, thus increasing biological control. Alternative food affects P. latus control on chilli pepper plants by predatory mites ( Duarte et al. 2015). Amblyseius herbicolus View in CoL had high oviposition and population growth rates when fed with cattail pollen Typha View in CoL (latifolia L.), chilli pepper pollen and beecollected pollen, and a low rate on the alternative prey ( Tetranychus urticae Koch View in CoL ). Supplementing pepper plants with pollen resulted in better control of broad mite populations ( Duarte et al.
2015). Release of A. herbicolus View in CoL on young plants with a weekly addition of honeybee pollen or cattail pollen until plants produce flowers seems a viable strategy to sustain populations of this predator ( Duarte et al. 2015).
World distribution: Anjouan Island, Argentina, Australia, Azores, Benin, Brazil, Burundi, Canary Islands, China, Colombia, Grande Comore Island, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic,
Dr Congo, El Salvador, Ghana, Guadeloupe Island, Guatemala, Hawaii, Honduras, India, Iran, Kenya, Les Saintes, La Réunion and Madagascar Islands, Malawi, Malaysia, Martinique Island, Mauritius Island, Mohéli Island, New Caledonia Island, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Rodrigues Island, Rwanda, Senegal, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, USA, Venezuela, West Indies.
Specimens examined: two specimens (2 ♀♀) collected during this study. Ivembeni,
Banda Samlini (791 m aasl, lat. 11°29 ′ 22 ″ S, long. 43°19 ′ 36 ″ E), 2 ♀♀ on Rubus rosifolius Smith (Rosaceae) , 7/XII/2018.
Remarks: morphological and morphometric characters and all measurements fit well with measurements provided in Kreiter et al. (2018b, 2020c, d, 2021a, b) and Kreiter and AboShnaf (2020a, b). Amblyseius herbicolus was previously recorded in many countries of the world and especially in French West Indies ( Moraes et al. 2000, Kreiter et al. 2006). It was first reported by Kreiter et al. (2018b) in the Comoros Archipelago in Grande Comore Island with two females collected. Amblyseius herbicolus was reported in the past from La Réunion Island with only few specimens ( Quilici et al. 1997, 2000) and more recently many specimens ( Kreiter et al. 2020d). It is also reported recently from Vietnam ( Kreiter et al. 2020c), Rodrigues and Maurice Islands (Kreiter and AboShnaf 2020a, b) but only from females. Males were however found among several females in Mohéli and will be redescribed in a following paper.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Amblyseius herbicolus (Chant)
Kreiter, Serge, Payet, Rose-My, Mouigni, Hadji, Douin, Martial, Tixier, Marie-Stéphane & Azali, Hamza Abdou 2021 |
Amblyseius (Amblyseialus) thermophilus
Karg W. 1991: 12 |
Amblyseius herbicolus
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & Denmark H. A. & Campos C. B. 2004: 27 |
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & van den Berg H. & Yaninek J. S. 1989: 79 |
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & Denmark H. A. 1986: 14 |
Amblyseius giganticus
Gupta S. K. 1981: 33 |
Amblyseius deleoni
Muma M. H. & Denmark H. A. 1970: 68 |
Amblyseius impactus
Chaudhri W. M. 1968: 553 |
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) amitae
Bhattacharyya S. K. 1968: 677 |
Typhlodromus herbicolus
Hirschmann W. 1962: 23 |
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) herbicolus
Muma M. H. 1961: 287 |
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) herbicolus
Chant D. A. 1959: 84 |