Roynortonia, Ermilov, 2011

Ermilov, S. G., 2011, A New Genus And Species Of Amerobelbidae (Acari: Oribatida) From Vietnam, Acarologia 51 (3), pp. 275-282 : 275-276

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1051/acarologia/20112012

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CF4A8782-EC03-1205-FC6B-F22B29D3F9DC

treatment provided by

Marcus

scientific name

Roynortonia
status

gen. nov.

Genus Roynortonia View in CoL n. gen.

Diagnosis

General characters of the family Amerobelbidae ( Grandjean 1965) . Rostrum rounded in dorsal view. Lamellar lines absent. Rostral (ro) and lamellar (le) setae setiform, short. Interlamellar (in) setae setiform, long. Lamellar setae inserted closer to interlamellar setae than to rostral setae. Sensilli (ss) with short cilia. Bothridia modified, with long, rigid projection posteriorly. Dorsosejugal scissure complete, slightly convex. Notogaster with one pair of short, thin spines anterolaterally. Epimeral setal formula 3-1-3-3. Aggenital neotrichy absent, one pair of aggenital setae present. Epimeral setae 3b modified, long, thorn-like. Epimeral setae 3b, 3c, 4b and 4c positioned adjacent to each other, so that epimeres III and IV without setae laterally.

Type species — Roynortonia vietnamica n. sp.

Etymology — The genus is named in honor of Prof. Dr. Roy A. Norton (State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, USA), the distinguished acarologist, for his extensive contributions to our knowledge of the oribatid mites.

Remarks — The family Amerobelbidae comprises five genera: Amerobelba Berlese, 1908 , Berndamerus Mahunka, 1977 , Hellenamerus Mahunka, 1974 , Mongaillardia Grandjean, 1961 , Rastellobata Grandjean, 1961 . Two other genera, Y ambaramerus and Grypoceramerus , have been included in Amerobelbidae , but I question this placement.

Aoki (1996) described Yambaramerus including it in Amerobelbidae . However both known representative of Yambaramerus , Y. arcuatus Aoki and Yamamoto, 2000 and Y. itoi Aoki, 1996 , differ from other Amerobelbidae by body proportions (prodorsum and notogaster approximately equal in length in Yambaramerus ; prodorsum obviously shorter than notogaster in other Amerobelbidae ), lamellar setae inserted on well-developed apophyses, close to each other (not inserted on well-developed apophyses, and not close each other in other Amerobelbidae ), lamellar lines well-developed (lamellar lines absent or slightly developed in other Amerobelbidae ), presence of ring-like structures adjacent to interlamellar setae (absent in other Amerobelbidae ), notogaster with two pairs of long and strongly developed thorn-like processes in humeral region (thorn-like structures absent or only one pair of small tubercles or spines present in other Amerobelbidae ).

Suzuki and Aoki (1970) described Grypoceramerus and included it in Amerobelbidae . However, the representative of Grypoceramerus , G. acutus Suzuki and Aoki, 1970 , strongly differs from other Amerobelbidae by body proportions (prodorsum and notogaster approximately equal in length in Grypoceramerus ; prodorsum obviously shorter than notogaster in other Amerobelbidae ), notogastral setae c and la adjacent to each other and separated from other setae (not adjacent to each other or removed from other setae in other Amerobelbidae ).

In my opinion, based on these character states Yambaramerus and Grypoceramerus are dissimilar to other genera of Amerobelbidae , and should not be considered members of this family. I do not discuss a place of Yambaramerus and Grypoceramerus in Ameroidea herein, their placement should be addressed in a separate publication.

Roynortonia View in CoL n. gen. clearly differs from all other genera of Amerobelbidae View in CoL by the following characters: 1) epimeral setae 3b modified, long, thorn-like, 2) epimeral setae 3b, 3c, 4b and 4c positioned adjacent to each other, 3) absence of aggenital neotrichy. Modified epimeral seta 3b is unique in Ameroidea and as far as I know it is unknown in Brachypylina. The presence of one pair of aggenital setae is unique in Amerobelbidae View in CoL , all other genera express aggenital neotrichy; the type species of the new genus has an unusual structure – a long, rigid projection posterior to the bothridium. This is the first record of a bothridia bearing projection in Brachypylina. However, there are a small number of oribatid species with short bothridial projections in a same position in the Ameroidea, for example, Staurobates schusteri Grandjean, 1966 View in CoL and Stauroma cephalotum Grandjean, 1966 View in CoL in Staurobatidae View in CoL .

The new genus is most similar to Amerobelba View in CoL in morphology of lamellar setae, absence of lamellar lines, absence of well-developed notogastral tubercles in humeral region (absent in Amerobelba View in CoL , only very short spines developed in Roynortonia View in CoL n. gen.), position of notogastral setae.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Sarcoptiformes

Family

Amerobelbidae

Loc

Roynortonia

Ermilov, S. G. 2011
2011
Loc

Roynortonia

Ermilov 2011
2011
Loc

Roynortonia

Ermilov 2011
2011
Loc

Staurobates schusteri

Grandjean 1966
1966
Loc

Stauroma cephalotum

Grandjean 1966
1966
Loc

Staurobatidae

Grandjean 1966
1966
Loc

Amerobelba

Berlese 1908
1908
Loc

Amerobelba

Berlese 1908
1908
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF