Psechrus libelti Kulczy
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3379.1.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D0272654-FF94-5854-FF20-28FAFAAF47FD |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Psechrus libelti Kulczy |
status |
|
Psechrus libelti Kulczy View in CoL ń ski, 1908, stat. nov.
Figs 5a–e View FIGURES 5 , 6a–e View FIGURES 6 , 82a View FIGURES 82 , 84b–c View FIGURES 84 , 87b View FIGURES 87 , 90b View FIGURES 90
Psechrus libeltii Kulczy ṅski 1908: 561, pl. 23, fig. 31 (Description and illustration of ♀). [Syntypes: 2 ♀♀ (light one SB 337, dark one SB 338), 2 s.a. ♂ (the one just before final moult SB 339, other one SB 340), all from INDONESIA: Sumatra, Sumatera Selatan Province: Palembang; Dr. S. Libelt leg. before 1908; 46/51U; MIZ, all type material examined]. Berland and Berland 1914: 133. Hogg 1914: 56; 1915: 436. Fage 1929: 360. Reimoser 1929: 132. Lehtinen 1967: 261. Levi 1982: 125 (Syn. with P. singaporensis View in CoL , rejected).
Psechrus argentatus View in CoL — Simon 1901: 47, misidentified.
Psechrus libelti View in CoL — Bonnet 1958: 3804 (Emendation). Platnick 1989: 428.
Psechrus singaporensis View in CoL — Levi 1982: 125, figs 40–53, ad part, figs 42–43, 48–53 misidentified (figs 48–51: illustration of ♀♀). Jocque and Dippenaar-Schoeman 2006: 219, figs 86a–f (Illustration of ♂ and ♀, misidentified).
Additional material examined (2 ♂♂, 8 ♀♀). THAILAND: Phuket Province: Phuket, Ton Sai waterfall, N 8°01', E 98°25', forest GoogleMaps ; M. Andersen, O. Martin & N. Scharff leg. 12.X.1991; 1 ♀ ( SB 611 ), ZMUC 4537 . Songkhla Province: Hat Yai, Khao Khor Hong, small mountainous area behind Prince of Song Khla University campus, ca. N 7°00'30'', E 100°30'40'', ca. 140 m GoogleMaps ; B. Phongsee leg. 15.IX.2005; 1 ♂ ( SB203 , deformed, presumably died immediately after final moult), SMF . MALAYSIA: Pahang Province: No further details ; Coll. Sherriffs; Tilg. 27-9-1962; 1 ♀ ( SB 1004 ), ZMUC 5726. Selangor Province: Templer’s Park, secondary forest, under roof of hut; C.L. Deeleman leg. 03.XII.1990; 1 ♀ ( SB130 ) , Deeleman Coll. in RMNH. Borneo : Sabah Province: Danum Valley (ca. 70 km W of Lahad Datu), ca. N 5°02', S 117°45', primary lowland rainforest; [observation no. 905] ; P. Koomen leg. 13. IV.2003; 1 ♀ ( SB 1141 , checked via photos of dorsal and ventral habitus and epigyne kindly provided by Peter Koomen ), [Photos were made in the field, specimen was released afterwards] . INDONESIA: Sumatra: ‘ Kouan Dam’ ; Burbon leg. 1913–1916; 1 ♀ ( SB 330 ), MNHN AR20193 . Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam Province: Gunung Leuser National Park , in tunnel next to cacao plantation ; P.R. & C.L. Deeleman leg. 03.I.1984; 1 ♀ ( SB 109 ), Deeleman Coll. in RMNH . Sumatera Barat Province: Mentawei Islands, Sipora ; Coll. Roewer; C.F. Roewer det.; 1 ♀ ( SB 87 ), SMF 2565 . BRUNEI DARUSSALAM: Tutong District: Tasek Merimbum Heritage Park, area C1, 45 km W of Bandar Seri Bagawan , N 4°35'39'', E 114°40'25'', 30 m, secondary peat forest GoogleMaps ; C. Griswold & J.K.H. Koh leg. 13.–14.X.2009, at night; TM 002 ; 1 ♀ ( SB 969 ), CAS 9036347.
Doubtful locality: INDIA? [sic; Remark: If really India, then Nicobar Islands; Up to now representatives of argentatus -group have never been recorded in (continental-) India or on Sri Lanka]; Hassan leg.; 1 ♂ ( SB 612 ), ZMUC 5720 .
Doubtful material examined. MALAYSIA: Borneo: Sarawak Province: Gunung Pueh ( Mt. Poi ); E. Mjöberg leg. 1920–1925; 1 juv. ( SB 1160 ), AMNH . PHILIPPINES: Palawan Province: Balabac Island; Dalawan Bay; ‘ Noona Dan Expedition 61–62’, leg. 09.X.1961; 1 ♂ ( SB 1006 ), ZMUC 5723 .
Revised diagnosis. Males and females similar to P. argentatus ( Doleschall, 1857) (see diagnostic character states described for argentatus -group above). Males with conductor (C) more than half as long as embolus (E) ( Figs 6b–d View FIGURES 6 ). Females with median septum (MS) almost as long as broad and with continuous lateral margins ( Figs 5a–b View FIGURES 5 ). Epigynal field (EF) less than three times longer than MS.
Description. Male:
Body and eye measurements. Carapace length 4.8–6.9, carapace width 3.5–5.2, anterior width of carapace 2.2–3.5, opisthosoma length 5.7–10.2, opisthosoma width 1.7–3.3. Eyes: AME 0.31–0.47, ALE 0.33–0.45, PME 0.33–0.45, PLE 0.32–0.45, AME–AME 0.17–0.24, AME–ALE 0.06–0.14, PME–PME 0.19–0.27, PME–PLE 0.27–0.31, AME–PME 0.44–0.46, ALE–PLE 0.41–0.43, clypeus height at AME 0.84–0.86, clypeus height at ALE 0.68–0.77.
Cheliceral furrow with three promarginal and four retromarginal teeth.
Measurements of palp and legs. Leg formula: 1423 or 1243. Palp 8.2–9.0 [2.7–3.0, 1.1–1.3, 1.1–1.2, 3.3–3.5], I 68.0–81.0 [17.8–20.9, 2.7–3.3, 18.0–21.3, 20.7–25.4, 8.8–10.1], II 46.9–56.7 [11.9–15.6, 2.4–2.9, 12.1–14.3, 13.8–16.9, 6.7–7.0], III 29.9–36.1 [8.5–10.4, 1.7–2.1, 7.3–8.8, 8.5–10.3, 3.9–4.5], IV 47.5–55.5 [12.0–13.7, 2.0–2.6, 12.0–13.9, 14.4–17.2, 7.1–8.1].
Spination. Palp: 131 (141), 110, 1101; legs: femur I 667 (878), II 767 (766) III 545 (656), IV 655 (665); patella I–IV 000; tibia I–II 3036 (3038), III 3134 (3136), IV 3036 (3136); metatarsus I 3037 (3035), II–III 3035, IV 3034. Palpal femur modified with ventral extension. The latter rather pointed ( Fig. 6e View FIGURES 6 ).
Copulatory organ. As in diagnosis and general description for argentatus -group.
Female:
Body and eye measurements. Carapace length 6.3–9.2, carapace width 4.1–6.5, anterior width of carapace 2.3–3.9, opisthosoma length 8.1–15.9, opisthosoma width 3.5–7.7. Eyes: AME 0.41–0.46, ALE 0.41–0.50, PME 0.43–0.50, PLE 0.42–0.50, AME–AME 0.27–0.37, AME–ALE 0.07–0.14, PME–PME 0.32–0.37, PME–PLE 0.30–0.52, AME–PME 0.46–0.71, ALE–PLE 0.47–0.71, clypeus height at AME 0.94–1.78, clypeus height at ALE 0.78–1.49.
Cheliceral furrow with three promarginal and four retromarginal teeth.
Measurements of palp and legs. Leg formula: 1423. Palp: 8.1–11.0 [2.8–3.9, 1.1–1.5, 1.5–2.0, 2.7–3.6]; Legs: I 54.5–69.6 [14.5–18.9, 2.9–4.1, 15.2–19.6, 15.2–19.5, 6.7–7.5], II 38.2–49.5 [10.8–14.4, 2.6–3.5, 10.3–12.8, 10.4–13.4, 4.1–5.4], III 25.8–34.2 [7.4–10.3, 1.8–2.7, 6.4–8.5, 7.0–8.8, 3.2–3.9], IV 39.1–52.2 [11.2–15.0, 2.3–3.2, 10.3–13.6, 10.8–14.2, 4.5–6.2].
Palpal claw with 12–14 teeth.
Spination. Palp: 141 (rarely 131), 110, 1101, 1014; legs (—except for patella— variable, only most common states noted): femur I 768 (667), II 767 (777) III 656 (756), IV 765 (856); patella I–IV 000; tibia I–II 3036, III 3134 (3136,3035), IV 3034 (3134); metatarsus I 3035, II 3035 (3037), III 3035, IV 3034 (3035).
Copulatory organ (see also diagnosis and general description of argentatus -group). Lateral margins of MS converging anteriorly ( Figs 5a–b View FIGURES 5 , 87b View FIGURES 87 ). Slit sense organs (SO) may be within or outside EF, epigynal muscle sigilla generally associated with EF.
Colouration of male and female. See description for argentatus -group and Psechrus .
Variation of copulatory organs. Males: No statement possible, because only two individuals have been examined. One of which with deformed tegulum (T). In females the shape of MS varies. In some specimens the lateral margins are slightly more curved ( Fig. 5b View FIGURES 5 ). Further, in some specimens the spermathecae and the lateral parts of CD are shifted somewhat in dorsal direction ( Fig. 5e View FIGURES 5 ). Directions of SH may differ slightly ( Figs 5c,e View FIGURES 5 , 90b View FIGURES 90 ).
Remarks: The two adult males (SB 203, SB 612) examined herein were assigned to P. libelti because their palps show the same diagnostic character states as the subadult male syntype SB 339. This latter specimen must have been collected just a few hours before adult moult. The bulb structures, including the long C, are visible through the cuticle ( Fig. 84b View FIGURES 84 ).
This species is removed from synonymy with P. singaporensis Thorell, 1894 because it shows clear differences in copulatory organs, which indicate that it does not even belong to the same species-group (singaporensis-), but to the argentatus -group. Levi (1982) synonymised this species with P. singaporensis , possibly based his decision on cursory similarities of MS of both species. He in fact illustrated the clear differences in vulvae (figs 44, 46 cf. figs 48, 50), but misinterpreted them. He probably had overseen the bulb structures of the s.a. male syntype (SB 339) visible through the cuticle, which additionally indicate that this species is more closely related to P. argentatus than to P. singaporensis . In the paragraph of his note concerning the synonymy he states that his decision “may be wrong” and that the females in his figs 48–51 “possibly belong to P. argentatus ” ( Levi 1982) .
The male from Balabac, Philippines (SB 1006, details see above) has a distinctly shorter cymbium (in relation to T) than the other males (and the males of argentatus examined herein). Its C is only slightly more than half as long as E. As long as there are no females available from that island, the identification of this specimen remains doubtful.
Distribution. Thailand [Southern part], Malaysia, Indonesia [Sumatra], Brunei Darussalam ( Figs 99–100 View FIGURE 99 View FIGURE 100 ).
SMF |
Forschungsinstitut und Natur-Museum Senckenberg |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Psechrus libelti Kulczy
Bayer, Steffen 2012 |
Psechrus libelti
Platnick, N. I. 1989: 428 |
Bonnet, P. 1958: 3804 |
Psechrus libeltii
Levi, H. W. 1982: 125 |
Lehtinen, P. T. 1967: 261 |
Fage, L. 1929: 360 |
Reimoser, E. 1929: 132 |
Hogg, H. R. 1915: 436 |
Berland, J. & Berland, L. 1914: 133 |
Hogg, H. R. 1914: 56 |
Psechrus argentatus
Simon, E. 1901: 47 |