Psechrus kinabalu Levi, 1982
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3379.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5255910 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D0272654-FF9D-585D-FF20-28FAFDA14495 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Psechrus kinabalu Levi, 1982 |
status |
|
Psechrus kinabalu Levi, 1982 View in CoL
Figs 11a–d View FIGURES 11 , 83e View FIGURES 83 , 84d View FIGURES 84
Psechrus kinabalu Levi 1982: 126 View in CoL , figs 54–55 (Description and illustration of ♂). [Holotype ♂ ( SB 237 ) from MALAYSIA: Borneo, Sabah Province: Mt. Kinabalu , 5500 ft. (1680 m); Field-Coll. - No. 5238; E.W. Classey leg. 20.–24.I.1976; NHM 1981˙4˙10˙11, examined].
Revised diagnosis (see also diagnosis for mulu -group above). Male with tegulum (T) converging strongly at (centro-)apical section and merging into embolus base (EB) ( Fig. 11b View FIGURES 11 ). Embolus (E) curved and very slightly serrated ventrally ( Figs 11a,c View FIGURES 11 ). With peculiar bulge proximal to EB ( Figs 11a–b View FIGURES 11 ).
Description. Male:
Body and eye measurements. Carapace length 4.9, carapace width 3.6, anterior width of carapace 1.9, opisthosoma length 5.3, opisthosoma width 2.1. Eyes: AME 0.28, ALE 0.36, PME 0.37, PLE 0.38, AME–AME 0.13, AME–ALE 0.04, PME–PME 0.23, PME–PLE 0.25, AME–PME 0.39, ALE–PLE 0.35, clypeus height at AME 0.54, clypeus height at ALE 0.42.
Cheliceral furrow with three promarginal and four retromarginal teeth.
Measurements of palp and legs. Leg formula: 1423. Palp: 5.7 [2.2, 0.9, 0.9, 1.7]; Legs: I 52.2 [14.0, 2.1, 14.3, 15.6, 7.6], II 39.0 [10.6, 1.7, 10.0, 11.1, 5.6], III 26.7 [7.7, 1.4, 6.4, 7.3, 3.9], IV 43.5 [11.7, 1.7, 10.3, 12.8, 7.0].
Spination. Palp: 131, 110{010}, 0100 (very small); legs: femur I 556, II 556, III 545, IV 545; patella I–IV 000; tibia I 3038, II 3036, III–IV 3136(dorsal one small); metatarsus I–IV 3035.
Palpal femur slim and modified with a ventral, pointed extension ( Fig. 11d View FIGURES 11 ). Palpal tibia relatively short, distally broader than proximally ( Figs 11a–c View FIGURES 11 ). MC-I–II and MT-I absent.
Copulatory organ (see also diagnosis and general description for mulu -group). T shorter than in P. mulu . If viewed from retrolateral ( Fig. 11c View FIGURES 11 ) it seems divided into a narrow distal part, which merges into to EB apically, and a broad and large basal part. Cymbium dorsally with very dense scopula, covering ca. 2/3 of cymbium ( Fig. 83e View FIGURES 83 ).
Female: unknown.
Colouration (see also description for mulu -group and Psechrus ). Median bands on carapace just slightly serrated.
Distribution. Malaysia [Borneo, Sabah Province] ( Fig. 100 View FIGURE 100 ).
Remarks: For the following reason it is unlikely that the male holotype represents the conspecific male of P. borneo: The females of P. mulu and P. borneo are similar. Consequently, for P. borneo I would anticipate a male that is similar to P. mulu . However, this does not apply to P. kinabalu , as its bulb as well as palpal tibia, -patella and -femur differ clearly from those of P. mulu .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Psechrus kinabalu Levi, 1982
Bayer, Steffen 2012 |
Psechrus kinabalu
Levi, H. W. 1982: 126 |