Parangitia MICAPENNIS Kaye , 1922
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.275866 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6211603 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D03C6C36-FFC7-2D7E-9C90-D6F4FC7CFC99 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Parangitia MICAPENNIS Kaye , 1922 |
status |
|
Parangitia MICAPENNIS Kaye, 1922 View in CoL
Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 67, 991–998[994], pl. I: fig. 2. Combination still valid (see Poole 1989).
Holotype, male, pinned:
Specimen data: No locality data. “Lamont | collection | 1950-16” [Printed] with label with “ TYPE ” [Handwritten in red ink] glued to it. “ Parangitia micapennis Kaye ” [Handwritten Lamont cabinet label]. Label bearing justification of holotype status by M.J.W.Cock, 1996.
Remarks: This specimen collected in Trinidad by Sir N. Lamont was considered by Lamont to be unambiguously the holotype. It is illustrated in colour in Pl. I: fig. 2 ( Kaye 1922, Kaye & Lamont 1927). Kaye & Lamont (1927) give the type locality as “Palmiste”. Poole (1989) erroneously suggests that the holotype is in BM(NH).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.