Phostria
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.275866 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6211526 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D03C6C36-FFD1-2D68-9C90-D2CEF9A8F862 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Phostria |
status |
|
Phostria View in CoL DUPLICATA Kaye, 1922
Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 67, 991–998 [997], pl. I: fig. 21.
Current accepted combination: Omiodes duplicata ( Kaye, 1922) (see Munroe 1995).
Holotype, male, pinned: also paratype Ƥ, pinned.
Specimen data: Holotype: “Palmiste | 25/4/21 ” [Handwritten (by Lamont)]. “Lamont | Collection | 1950- 16.”[Printed]. “ Type ” [Typewritten in red, large font], on verso “ Sylepta | duplicata | ( Kaye 1922)” [Handwritten]. “ Sylepta duplicata Kaye ” [Handwritten Lamont cabinet label]. “ Omiodes duplicata | Kaye male | Det. M.J.W. Cock 2002” [Printed].
Remarks: The holotype is from Palmiste, Trinidad, and was collected by Sir N. Lamont on 25 April 1921. The species is illustrated in colour in Pl. I: fig. 21 ( Kaye 1922, Kaye & Lamont 1927). Kaye & Lamont (1927) quote the type locality and date as “Palmiste, 28 [sic] April, 1921” and also erroneously state that “ Type in National Collection [i.e., BM(NH)]”. The quoted date appears to be a simple transcription error.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.