Remartinia Navás, 1911
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4628.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E4C2F52F-9A1A-4C55-B03B-C87B2B4C4676 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5921471 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D076D419-B56A-FFAD-FF23-F1B627CEFDDF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Remartinia Navás, 1911 |
status |
|
Remartinia Navás, 1911 View in CoL
Only four species of Remartinia are known, two of which occur in Ecuador. These are large green aeshnids with small black markings ( Fig. 65 View FIGURE 65 ). See Calvert (1956) and Carvalho (1992) for species identification. Known mainly from small ponds with emergent vegetation along the edges.
Remartinia luteipennis ( Burmeister, 1839) . Publ. Recs. LJ: * Tennessen & Johnson (2008), (H14). Also ARG, BRA, CEN, COL, PRY, VEN: (H06), (P11).
Addl. Data. ES, San Lorenzo: 1 ♂, roadside pool 36.5 km NW of Lita, near Urbina, 3 ii 1997, leg. WFM, det. KJT [KJT]; 1 ♂, [San Antonio], nearby, 36.5 km WNW of Lita on [old] San Lorenzo Hwy. , pools/seeps/stream (0.95, -78.68, 200m), 3 ii 1997, leg. & det. WFM [FSCA]; 1 ♀, San Lorenzo, pools 5.6 km NW of Lita, Finca Con- suegros, 4 ii 1997, leg. & det. JJD [JJD]; 1 ♂, Lita along RR track 1–5 km W adjacent to Río Baboso GoogleMaps seeps, pools & streams (0.8792, -78.4589, 535m), 5 ii 1997, leg. & det. WFM [LSAM]; GY, Naranjal: “Finca de la Gringa,” 15 km E of Tres Cerritos GoogleMaps (-2.4456, -79.5556, 25m), 12 iv 2008, leg. & det. KJT [KJT]; IM, Cotacachi: 1 ♂, Apu- ela, Ruta Plaza Gutierrez, seepage into Rio Tuabunchi (0.3575, -78.4993, 1634m], 27 viii 2018, leg. & det. WFM [FSCA]; same data, 1 ♂, 1 ♀, leg. & det. KJT [KJT]; Ibarra: 1 ♂, Salinas, 0.5 km E, pools/small irrigation stream (0.55, -78.12, 1676m), 6 ii 1997, leg. & det. WFM [FSCA]; LJ, Loja: 1 ♂, seep trib. of Río Chamba, Vilcabamba GoogleMaps (-4.2636, -79.2172, 1555m), 31 iii 2008, leg. & det. JTJ [JTJ]; MS, Santiago: 2 ♂♂, pond 5 km N of Bella Union, Hwy. 45, 7 xi 1997, leg. & det. JJD [JJD]; NA, Archidona: stream/pool 43.5 km W of Loreto, Loreto road, 15 vii 1996, leg. & det. JJD [JJD]; 1 ♀, small stream, Baeza-Tena Road, 12 km N Loreto Road, 14 vii 1996, leg. & det. KJT [KJT]; Tena: 1 ♀, Río Napo slough, 3.2 km E of Puerto Napo, 23 vii 1996, leg. & det. JJD [JJD]; PC, San Miguel de los Bancos: 1 ♂, Mindo, Mindo Gardens Ecolodge, vegetated cement pond (-0.0720, -78.7560, 1330m], leg. & det. WFM [FSCA]; same data but 1 ♂, leg. & det. KJT [KJT]; SU, Shushufindi: 1 ♂, Limoncocha, Thorn Palm Swamp “on Río Napo ” (-0.4000, -76.6167, 269m), 26 xi 1980, leg. & det. MJW [FSCA].
Remartinia rufipennis (Kennedy, 1941) . Publ. Recs. ECU: Paulson (1983 —as Coryphaeschna rufipennis ), Tsuda (1986, 1991 —as C. rufipennis ), Steinmann (1997b—as C. rufipennis ), (H06), (P11), (H14); ES: Daigle et al. (1997) [Note: The ES specimens were later determined to be R. luteipennis ]; MS: Tennessen (1998); PA: Calvert (1956) commented that he could not find “Río Pupuyacu”; we suspect it was Río Papayacu which is in Pastaza); ZC: Tennessen (2000). Also PER: (H06), (P11).
Addl. Data. MS, Santiago: 1 ♀, pond along road between Tayuza GoogleMaps and Mendez (-2.7283, -78.2700, 600m), 6 iv 1997, leg. & det. TWD [SWD]; 1 ♀, same data but 7 xi 1997 [SWD]; 1 ♂, [Patuca], [about 1 ml N], 43.4 km S of Sucua, large pond [about 5 km N of Mendez road jct] (-2.75, -78.27, about 600m), 7 xi 1997, leg. & det. KJT [KJT]; 1 ♂, same data but leg. & det. WFM [FSCA]; 1 ♂, 3 ♀♀, same data but 8 xi 1997, leg. & det. WFM [FSCA, LSAM, QZAC, USNM]; 2 ♀♀, same data but leg. KJT [KJT]; SU, Shushufindi: 1 ♂, Limoncocha, Río GoogleMaps Napo (-0.4000, -76.6167, 269m), 31 viii 1974, leg. B. Drummond III, det. MJW [FSCA]; ZC, Zamora GoogleMaps : 1 ♂, grassy marsh, 5.5 km E of Zamora, 5 xi 1997, leg. & det. KJT [KJT]; 1 ♀, ditch/pool near small stream, Bombuscaro Road S of Zamora, about 1000m, 19 xiii 2006, leg. & det. KJT [KJT].
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.