Listroderini LeConte, 1876, 1849
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.273.4116 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D58E2AB4-A60B-5CDC-80CB-2DC33A132BFA |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Listroderini LeConte, 1876 |
status |
|
Tribe Listroderini LeConte, 1876 Figs 18 View Figures 18–26 -35 View Figures 27–35
Listroderi LeConte, 1876: 124.
Listroderitos Germain, 1895: 287.
Listroderina Champion, 1902: 120.
Listroderini Hustache, 1926: 175.
Listroderinae Thompson, 1992: 876.
Type genus.
Listroderes Schönherr, 1826.
Diagnosis.
Very small to very large (1.0-22.8 mm); integument reddish brown (black in Acrostomus ); vestiture consisting mostly of dense scales and setae (rarely only scales or setae), setae on rostrum and pronotum directed anteriad or mesad, on elytra posteriad; rostrum stout and very short to slender, as long as or longer than pronotum; scrobes usually lateral; epistome poorly demarcated, rarely raised ( Acrostomus ); eyes usually large, flat, transverse or subcircular; mandibles with two apical cusps and paucisetose (1-4 setae); antennae with funicle 7-segmented, segments 1 and usually 2 elongate, clubs fusiform or inflated; prothorax with or without postocular lobes; prosternum long, non-excavate; elytra oblong-oval, elongate-oval or subrectangular; tibiae mucronate, generally with spurs (when present pro- and mesotibiae with 1 spur and metatibiae with 1-2 spurs); claws divaricate, simple or with slight basal swelling; aedeagus with tegmen lacking parameres (reduced in Methypora ); distal gonocoxites membranous, generally simple, with large, apical or subapical stylus carrying a tuft of setae, but occasionally without stylus and apex of gonocoxite flattened and bent outwards.
Comparative notes.
Listroderini were formerly considered as related to Rhythirrinini ( Kuschel 1971; Anderson and Morrone 1996; Morrone 1997a, b, 2002a; Anderson 2002). Oberprieler (2010, in press) considered Notiomimetini to be close relatives of Listroderini , although he suggested that more detailed studies would be required to decide whether they should be merged into a single tribe or not. Based on the results of this analysis, Listroderini and Notiomimetini (Aphela) are hypothesized to be sister tribes.
Biology.
Larvae of Listroderini are generally oligophagous ectophytic root-feeders ( Oberprieler in press). Adults feed on the leaves of a variety of angiosperms ( Morrone 2011).
Key to the subtribes of Listroderini
1 | Rostrum slender, as long as or longer than pronotum (except shorter than pronotum in some species of Listronotus ); scrobes long, sharply bordered, reaching eyes; funicular segment 1 usually subequal to or shorter than 2; commonly associated with aquatic or semiaquatic plants | Palaechthina |
- | Rostrum stout or relatively stout, shorter than pronotum; scrobes usually short, ill-defined, broad; funicular segment 1 longer than 2; associated to terrestrial plants | 2 |
2 | Rostral dorsal carinae usually absent; pterygia auriculate, exposed ( Fig. 5 View Figures 1–12 ) | Falklandiina |
- | Rostral dorsal carinae present; pterygia simple, not exposed ( Fig. 6 View Figures 1–12 ) | 3 |
3 | Scrobes short, ill-defined, broad, lacking suprascrobal keel; elytra with intervals convex, with anteapical tubercle (except for Rupanius ) | Listroderina |
- | Scrobes long, deep, sharply bordered, reaching eyes, with suprascrobal keel; elytra with intervals usually flat, lacking anteapical tubercle | Macrostyphlina |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Listroderini LeConte, 1876
Morrone, Juan J. 2013 |
Listroderina
LeConte 1876 |
Listroderini
LeConte 1876 |