Anisodactylus agricola (Say, 1823)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:68FE3835-2401-43A7-96E2-CF26532F7A60 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D6057090-317F-C682-9108-BD07C0C6FFCF |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Anisodactylus agricola (Say, 1823) |
status |
|
Anisodactylus agricola (Say, 1823)
Harpalus agricolus Say, 1823a: 33. Type locality: "Allegheny, P[ennsylvani]a" (neotype label). Neotype (♀), designated by Lindroth and Freitag (1969: 354), in MCZ [# 32985].
Harpalus paradoxus Haldeman, 1843b: 302. Type locality: southeastern Pennsylvania (Haldeman 1843a: 297). Syntype(s) presumably lost. Synonymy established by Melsheimer (1853: 23).
Anisodactylus striatus LeConte, 1847: 380. Type locality: "Evansville, I[ow]a alterumque ad Rocky Mountains" (original citation), restricted to "Evansville, Iowa" by Noonan (1996: 44). Lectotype (♀), designated by Noonan (1996: 44), in MCZ [# 5956]. Synonymy established by Melsheimer (1853: 23), confirmed by Noonan (1996: 44).
Distribution.
This species ranges from Maine and southern Quebec to southeastern Minnesota, south to northern Arkansas (Kraim 1983: 176), central Alabama, and northwestern South Carolina (Ciegler 2000: 89) [see Noonan 1996: Fig. 235]. The record from “Colorado” (Leng 1920: 72) is probably in error.
Records.
CAN: ON, QC USA: AL, AR, CT, DC, DE, GA, IA, IL, IN, KS, KY, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, NC, NE, NH, NJ, NY, OH, PA, RI, SC, TN, VA, WI, WV
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Anisodactylus agricola (Say, 1823)
Bousquet, Yves 2012 |
Harpalus paradoxus
Haldeman 1843 |