Neoponera, Emery, 1901
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1590/1806-9665-RBENT-2021-0089 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D60787DD-2539-FFC2-8A5D-FE80FA96FB45 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Neoponera |
status |
|
Neoponera moesta (Mayr, 1870)
Figs. 17 View Figure 17 , 21E View Figure 21
Material examined. Ecuador. Esmeraldas: Reserva Ecológica Cotacachi Cayapas , 0.69611°N, 78.9108°W, 37m, 1♀, 2☿, 2001-04-01, Araujo, P. et al., fogging ( MEPN) GoogleMaps ; same information, except: 0.845264°N, 78.7447°W, 120m, 1♀, 2☿, ( MEPN) GoogleMaps ; Orellana: Parque Nacional Yasuní, 32 Km SSE Limoncocha , Km 39 Pompeya sur, 0.65713°S, 76.453°W, 216m, 3♀, 5☿, 1995-02-08, Erwin, T. et al., fogging ( MEPN) GoogleMaps ; same information, except: 4☿, 1995-02-11, ( MEPN) ; 3☿, 1995-02-10, ( MEPN) ; Pastaza: Parque Nacional Yasuní , 151 Km SE Limoncocha, 1.61°S, 75.9692°W, 172m, 1☿, 2014-01-13, Chasiliquín, N. & Villacrés, E., Winkler, ( MEPN) GoogleMaps .
Comments. According to Mackay and Mackay (2010) this species belongs to theN. crenata group. This is a hard-to-identify species due to its strong morphological resemblance to its closest lineages N. crenata Roger and N. globularia Mackay & Mackay. Even the types (images available on AntWeb) require further revision.The workers and queens of N. moesta mainly differ from those of N. crenata in the distance from the anterior margin of eye to the anterolateral head corner (at the mandibular articulation) which is greater than half eye maximum length (shorter in N. crenata). Neoponera moesta is distinguishable from N. globularia mainly by its petiolar node, which is sub-triangular dorsally, while that of N.globularia is mostly rounded dorsally.This arboreal species is fairly common in well preserved to semi-disturbed habitats of lowland and pre-mountainous wet habitats of Amazonia and the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, though it has been collected also in deciduous habitats of Central America. Despite being relatively common in field samples virtually nothing is known about its natural history, but see Mackay and Mackay (2010), andLongino (2002). This species is widely distributed throughout Central and South America ( Mackay & Mackay 2010).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.