Chthamalus barnesi Achituv & Safriel, 1980
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1026.60733 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A27C7BA5-F206-46A2-B307-167C99BBFDDD |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D6B38229-4C1A-5E19-A025-6C3021BD42FC |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Chthamalus barnesi Achituv & Safriel, 1980 |
status |
|
Chthamalus barnesi Achituv & Safriel, 1980 Figures 3F-H View Figure 3 , 11 View Figure 11
Examined material.
Five specimens (BD: 3.03-5.57 mm), LFSc.ZRC-160, Shivrajpur, Jamnagar District (22°20'03"N, 68°57'17"E), 17 February 2019, Gujarat, India, rocky shore, leg. M. Doshi. GoogleMaps
Diagnosis
(modified from Shahdadi and Sari 2011). Shell orifices almost kite-shaped (Fig. 3F, G View Figure 3 ). Tergum narrow with upper part broader than lower part and suture between tergum and scutum zigzag-shaped (Fig. 3H View Figure 3 ). Scutum elongated and triangular and lateral depressor muscle pit distinct without crest (Fig. 3H View Figure 3 ). Maxilla bilobed (Fig. 11A View Figure 11 ). Maxillule not notched or possess very shallow notch (Fig. 11B View Figure 11 ). Lower part of maxillule is setose. Mandible with four teeth (Fig. 11C View Figure 11 ). Basal comb with rows of 16-23 short spines and 2-4 stout large spines at lower angle (Fig. 11D View Figure 11 ). Mandibulatory palp with dense setae on all margins (Fig. 11E View Figure 11 ). Labrum with numerous fine teeth present (Fig. 11F View Figure 11 ). Cirrus I: anterior ramus (with seven or eight segments) longer than posterior (usually with 5-7 segments) (Fig. 11G View Figure 11 ). Cirrus II: anterior ramus (with six-seven segments) longer than posterior (usually with 5-7 segments) (Fig. 11H View Figure 11 ). Cirri III-VI: rami almost equal in size.
Remarks.
The examined specimen in the present study agree with the description given by Achituv and Safriel (1980) and Shahdadi and Sari (2011). Chthamalus barnesi forms part of the Chthamalus challengeri group and closely resembles C. moro Pilsbry, 1916, C. neglectus Yan & Chan, 2004, and C. challengeri Hoek, 1883, but can be differentiated based on the following characters: a depression towards the tergo-occludent corner of the scutum ( C. moro , lacks this depression, Southward and Newman 2003), the tergal margin is not straight (tergal margin straight in C. moro , Southward & Newman, 2003), the scutal margin of the tergum shows a deep articular furrow (scutal margin of tergum almost straight in C. neglectus , Yan & Chan, 2004), and the maxillule possess a very shallow notch (maxillule possesses a distinct notch in C. challengeri , Shahdadi & Sari, 2011).
Worldwide distribution.
The species has been reported from the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden, and Gulf of Oman including Yemen, Oman, Iran, Saudi Arabia ( Shahdadi and Sari 2011), and northwest India (present study).
Distribution in India.
This species is reported for the first time in India from the coastal regions of Gujarat.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |