Palaeorionis, Belokobylskij & Hovorka, 2022
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90545 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:20468409-9032-48A8-948F-3EFD0EF2C5C9 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3DBBCBF8-D9A1-455C-857A-F76B18E09778 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:3DBBCBF8-D9A1-455C-857A-F76B18E09778 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Palaeorionis |
status |
gen. nov. |
Genus Palaeorionis gen. nov.
Figs 1 View Figure 1 , 2 View Figure 2
Type species.
Palaeorionis longicaudis gen. et sp. nov., by present designation and monotypy.
Etymology.
Named after “palaeo” (Greek for “ancient”) and the generic name of its similar extant genus, Orionis , which belongs to the subfamily Euphorinae . Gender: masculine.
Description.
Head (Fig. 1B, C View Figure 1 ) weakly transverse. Ocelli rather large and distinctly convex. Frons weakly convex. Eyes large, elongate-oval, glabrous. Face distinctly convex. Malar space very short; malar suture perhaps absent. Clypeus complete, distinctly convex (lateral view); hypoclypeal depression absent. Occipital carina distinct laterally, perhaps widely interrupted dorsally (Fig. 1B View Figure 1 ). Mandibles relatively small. Maxillary palpus very long (Fig. 1C View Figure 1 ), perhaps 6-segmented (medial segments hidden by mesosoma), its apical segment very long and slender, almost 25.0 times longer than its maximum width. Labial palpus short, with 4 segments, third segment very small, tiny, subglobular; apical (fourth) segment longest, knife-shaped, narrowed towards apex.
Antenna (Fig. 1A, C View Figure 1 ) long, slender, filiform, about 33-segmented. Scapus rather short and wide. Pedicel relatively small. First flagellar segment subcylindrical, without any transformations, much longer than its apical width, about as long as second segment. Apical segment pointed apically, but without spine.
Mesosoma (Fig. 1C, D, E View Figure 1 ). Sides of pronotum rugose upper and areolate below. Mesoscutum perhaps smooth, narrowly reticulate laterally. Notauli present, perhaps almost complete and shallow especially posteriorly. Scutellum distinctly convex. Prepectal carina present, sharp and distinct. Mesopleuron mainly smooth. Precoxal sulcus present, long, not deep, curved, distinctly crenulate-reticulate. Metascutum without dorsal tooth (lateral view). Propodeum dorsally almost straight in basal two-thirds, distinctly oblique sloped, starting from basal third, without lateral tubercles (in lateral view).
Wings (Fig. 1G View Figure 1 ). Fore wing rather narrow, pterostigma long and rather narrow. Radial (marginal) cell weakly shortened, narrow, about 4.5 times longer than its maximum width. Metacarpus (1-R1) 1.2 times longer than pterostigma. First medial abscissa (1-SR+M) present and curved. Present both radiomedial veins (2-SR and r-m). Second radiomedial (submarginal) cell short, pentagonal. Discoidal (first discal) cell not petiolate anteriorly, sessile. Recurrent vein (m-cu) postfurcal, subparallel to basal vein (1-M). First mediocubital vein (M+CU1) well sclerotised and distinctly sinuate. Nervulus (cu-a) postfurcal. Brachial (first subdiscal) cell open posteriorly; brachial vein (CU1b) absent. Transverse anal veins (1a and 2a) absent. Hind wing. Submedial (subbasal) cell short. First abscissa of mediocubital vein (M+CU) distinctly shorter than second abscissa (1-M).
Legs (Fig. 1A, F View Figure 1 ) slender and very long. Hind coxa elongate, without ventro-basal tubercle, as long as propodeum. Hind femur long and slender, 0.8 times as long as hind tibia. Hind tibia narrow basally, distinctly widened in apical 0.8. Hind tibial spurs relatively short, 0.3 times as long as hind basitarsus. Hind basitarsus about 0.8 times as long as second-fifth segments combined. Tarsal claw small and simple.
Metasoma (Figs 1A View Figure 1 , 2 View Figure 2 ) elongate, compressed behind petiole, entirely smooth, segments behind third one distinctly exposed posteriorly. First metasomal tergite very narrow entirely, fused ventrally almost entirely, tubular, smooth dorsally, with spiracles situated behind middle of petiole, without dorsope and laterope; 0.6 times as long as mesosoma and metasoma behind petiole. Suture between second and third tergites absent. Laterotergites (epipleura) of all segments not separated. Ovipositor long, weakly curved, compressed basally. Ovipositor sheath 1.2 times longer than the body length, almost twice longer than mesosoma, 1.1 times longer than fore wing (Fig. 1A View Figure 1 ).
Comparative diagnosis.
Palaeorionis gen nov. is characterised by a long and tube-like petiole resembling a similar structure in some extant Euphorinae genera, especially Aridelus Marshall, 1887, Chrysopophthorus Goidanich, 1948, Orionis Shaw, 1987, Stenothremma Shaw, 1984, and Wesmaelia Foerster, 1863.
Palaeorionis gen. nov. differs from Orionis Shaw by having the last segment of the maxillary palpus very long and narrow (shorter and thicker in Orionis ), discoidal (discal) cell of infuscate fore wing sessile (petiolate in hyaline fore wing in Orionis ), second radiomedial vein (r-m) present (absent in Orionis ), mediocubital vein (M+CU1) sinuate (straight in Orionis ), brachial (subdiscal) cell long and rather narrow (short and wide in Orionis ), petiole of metasoma smooth and without any carinae (at least partly sculptured and with lateral carinae in Orionis ), and ovipositor sheath longer than metasoma (distinctly shorter in Orionis ).
Palaeorionis gen nov. differs from Aridelus Marshall by having the last segment of maxillary palpus very long and narrow (shorter and thicker in Aridelus ), mesosoma relatively long (short in Aridelus ), hind coxa distinctly elongate-oval (shortly oval in Aridelus ), mesosoma without areolate sculpture (entirely areolate in Aridelus ), mediocubital vein (M+CU1) of fore wing sinuate (straight in Aridelus ), hind femur relatively wide (narrow in Aridelus ), metasoma rather compressed and with distinctly exposed apical segments (not compressed and retracted apical segments as in Aridelus ), and ovipositor sheath longer than metasoma (very short and usually concealed inside of the metasoma in Aridelus ).
The newly described genus also differs from Stenothremma Shaw by the last segment of the maxillary palpus very long and narrow (shorter and thicker in Stenothremma ), mesosoma relatively long (short in Stenothremma ), hind coxa distinctly elongate-oval (subglobal in Stenothremma ), body without granulate sculpture (head, mesosoma and petiole densely granulate in Stenothremma ), discoidal (discal) cell of infuscate fore wing sessile (petiolate in hyaline fore wing in Stenothremma ), second radiomedial vein (r-m) present (often absent in Stenothremma ), mediocubital vein (M+CU1) sinuate (straight in Stenothremma ), brachial (subdiscal) cell long and rather narrow (short and wide in Stenothremma ), petiole of metasoma smooth (petiole mainly granulate in Stenothremma ), and ovipositor sheath longer than metasoma (distinctly shorter in Stenothremma ).
The differences from the extant genera Wesmaelia and Orionis are summarized in Table 1 View Table 1 .
Between the known fossil Euphorinae genera, Palaeorionis gen nov. is similar to Onychoura Brues, 1933 (with type species O. petiolata Brues, 1933) and Meteorites Brues, 1939 (with type species M. inopinata Brues, 1939), both from Baltic amber. This new genus differs from Onychoura by having malar area short (very long in Onychoura ), mesosoma relatively elongated (very short in Onychoura ), notauli present (perhaps absent in Onychoura ), propodeum long (very short in Onychoura ), radial (marginal) cell of fore wing weakly shortened (strongly shortened in Onychoura ), recurrent vein (m-cu) distinctly postfurcal (interstitial in Onychoura ), petiole of metasoma not swollen (swollen in Onychoura ), and ovipositor longer than metasoma and without apical hook (distinctly shorter and with very slender apical hook in Onychoura ). Palaeorionis gen nov. distinctly differs from Meteorites Brues by the last segment of maxillary palpus very long and narrow (much shorter and thicker in Meteorites ), antenna long, about 33-segmented (short, 13-14-segmented in Meteorites ), mesosoma relatively long, about twice longer than height (short, about as long as height in Meteorites ), second radiomedial vein (r-m) of fore wing present (absent in Meteorites ), nervulus (cu-a) and recurrent (m-cu) veins distinctly postfurcal (almost interstitial in Meteorites ), petiole of metasoma not widened distally and almost straight (widened distally and distinct evenly curved in Meteorites ), and ovipositor longer than metasoma and almost straight (distinctly shorter and strongly arcuate in Meteorites ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Euphorinae |