Microgaster procera Ruthe, 1860
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1188.112516 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CBA8C741-95AB-4DB5-9E80-AAAA500D3572 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D8CF51D2-1623-5256-9ACA-76353D83956B |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Microgaster procera Ruthe, 1860 |
status |
|
Microgaster procera Ruthe, 1860 View in CoL
Material examined.
Canada: Prince Edward Island: Near Georgetown; Georgetown , 46.417, -62.667, 8 m, 31.vii.2005, leg. M. Sharkey, WMIC 0244; WMIC 0245 GoogleMaps ; Germany: Bavaria: Berchtesgaden National Park, Königssee, Rinnkendlsteig , 47.553, 12.964, 775 m, Malaise trap, 30.vii.2017, leg. D. Doczkal, J. Voith, ZSM-HYM-33160-F06; Berchtesgaden National Park , Wald west of St. Bartholomae , 47.547, 12.965, 620 m, Malaise trap, 28.vi.2017, leg. D. Doczkal, J. Voith, ZSM-HYM-33156-E05; ZSM-HYM-33156-E06; ZSM-HYM-33156-E07; Schmelzenholzham, Waldrand, 48.488, 13.124, 468 m, Malaise trap, 12.vii.2019, leg. J. Müller, ZSM-HYM-42325-B01; Siegenburg, Bombodrom, 48.755, 11.791, 411 m, Malaise trap, 13.vii.2017, leg. D. Doczkal, J. Voith, ZSM-HYM-42324-D03 GoogleMaps .
Geographical distribution.
NEA, PAL.
NEA*- Canada* (PE); PAL- Austria, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Mongolia, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia (SPE), Spain, Ukraine.
Molecular data.
BIN: BOLD:AAA9548.
Host information.
Host of type unknown. Shaw (2012a) gives tentative hosts of some British specimens (see below).
Notes.
This is not a new record for Germany, but morphological examination of German material and assignment of the species name to a barcoding cluster allow us to record the species in the Nearctic for the first time. The Canadian specimens were compared to the European material and all sequences in this barcoding cluster have a maximum pairwise-distance of just 0.15%. The host information for this species must be considered as mostly unreliable; based on a recent discussion ( Shaw 2012a: 194) it seems as though the crambid Anania hortulata could be the most trustable record, but even that needs verification. This species is illustrated in Figs 50 View Figure 50 , 51 View Figure 51 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |