Sphecodes tibeticus Astafurova & Niu, 2020
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.79.57276 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:613B1ED3-4100-401B-B632-E9B4AFE71AC0 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D66E158F-D87C-40BE-8F9C-CA73487DA5CC |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:D66E158F-D87C-40BE-8F9C-CA73487DA5CC |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Sphecodes tibeticus Astafurova & Niu |
status |
sp. nov. |
Sphecodes tibeticus Astafurova & Niu sp. nov.
Figures 4 View Figure 4 , 5 View Figure 5
Material examined.
Holotype: ♂, China: Xizang, Chayu Country, Zhowagoin Town, Zala Village [28.60795N, 97.28781E], 1973 m, 27.VIII.2014, leg. Q.T. Wu [IZCAS]. GoogleMaps
Diagnosis.
This species resembles the East-Palaearctic Sphecodes laticaudatus Tsuneki, 1983, sharing a similar structure and sculpture of the body, including the shape of antennal tyloids and gonostylus, a densely punctate head, mesoscutum and scarcely punctate metasomal terga. The new species differs from S. laticaudatus by sparser, weakly-plumose facial pubescence below the antennal sockets that does not obscure the integument (versus denser, well-plumose pubescence, obscuring integument), and a more elevated vertex with the distance from top of head to upper margin of a lateral ocellus ca. a lateral ocellar diameter as seen in frontal view, Fig. 5A View Figure 5 (versus a half diameter in typical form, Fig. 5B View Figure 5 ).
Description.
Male. Total body length 8 mm (Fig. 4A View Figure 4 ). Head black (Fig. 5A View Figure 5 ), weakly transverse, about 1.1 times as wide as long; vertex elevated, with distance from top of head to upper margin of lateral ocelli ca. a lateral ocellar diameters as seen in frontal view ca. two lateral ocellar diameters as seen in dorsal view; antenna short (Fig. 5C View Figure 5 ), reaching posterior margin of mesoscutum, F1 0.6 times as long as wide, F2 1.9 times as long as wide, remaining flagellomeres ca. 1.4 times as long as wide; tyloids weakly developed, semicircular across basal 1/8-1/5 of flagellar surfaces; supraclypeal area flat; preoccipital carina absent; face and ocello-ocular area with confluent (finely areolate) punctures (ca. 20 μm); vertex behind ocelli roughly rugose; gena finely rugose; face below antennal sockets with relatively sparse weakly plumose setae, gena with sparse thin setae.
Mesosoma (Fig. 5D View Figure 5 ) black, tarsi brownish. Wings hyaline with brown stigma and veins; hind wing with the angle between basal (M) and cubital (Cu) veins 80°, costal margin with six hamuli. Pronotum, between dorsal and lateral surfaces, with sharp angle. Mesoscutum mostly with confluent punctures ca. 20-30 μm. Mesoscutellum, hypoepimeral area, mesepisternum, propodeal triangle and lateral part of propodeum roughly reticulate-rugose.
Metasoma dark black (Fig. 5E View Figure 5 ); terga scarcely punctate, T1 almost impunctate with a few microscopic punctures, remaining terga with a few shallow punctures on anterior half, marginal zones impunctate, smooth (except finely tessellate on T4); sterna delicately tessellate with numerous microscopical setae pores; gonocoxite dorsally with impression; gonostylus with semi-oval membranous part (Fig. 4C, D View Figure 4 ).
Female unknown.
Etymology.
The new species is named after its locality Tibet (Xizang).
Distribution.
Only known from the type locality in Xizang (China).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |