Limulopteryx hintelmanni, Grebennikov, Vasily V., 2008
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.181230 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6227723 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D967E12A-933B-FFAF-DAE5-FC9EFF3A3E99 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Limulopteryx hintelmanni |
status |
sp. nov. |
Limulopteryx hintelmanni View in CoL sp. n.
( Figs 1–14 View FIGURES 1 – 5 View FIGURES 6 – 11 View FIGURES 12 – 14 )
Description. Similar in all characters to L. loebli , except as noted below and in the diagnosis. Body length from clypeus to apex of tergite X 0.93–1.00mm (n=2; beetles slightly expanded in Euparal medium); head maximal width 0.25 mm (n=2); eye partly reduced in size, with some 20–28 facets; pronotal maximal width 0.45mm (n=2); abdominal glands not found; aedeagus elongate ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ) with fine internal sclerotisation; eyes, wings, wing-folding patches in tergites II–V and hindwing cleaning (=toiletry) device (see Hall, 2003) on posterior margin of tergite VII present and fully developed.
Diagnosis. Limulopteryx hintelmanni can be distinguished from L. loebli , its only congener, using the following key:
1. Prosternal process absent; spatulate ventral process protruding between mesocoxae 2.3X times longer than wide ( Figs 7 View FIGURES 6 – 11 , 14 View FIGURES 12 – 14 ); meso-metaventral suture almost straight and transverse; mesoscutellum 2.4X wider than long; metascutellum short ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 12 – 14 ); tergite X without apical projections, evenly rounded apically ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ); metacoxae almost contiguous ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ); basal stalk of metendosternite narrow ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 12 – 14 ); metacoxae posteriorly angulate, not serrate ( Figs 7, 11 View FIGURES 6 – 11 ) ..............................Limulopteyx hintelmanni View in CoL sp.n.
- Prosternal process present; spatulate ventral process protruding between mesocoxae 1.7X times longer than wide; meso-metaventral suture bent anteriorly; mesoscutellum 2.0X wider than long; metascutellum long ( Hall 2003, fig. 11); tergite X with apical tooth; metacoxae separated by about ¼ of metaventral width ( Hall, 2003, fig. 3); basal stalk of metendosternite about as wide as distance between metacoxae ( Hall, 2003, fig. 3); metacoxae posteriorly rounded and serrate ( Hall, 2003, fig. 14d) ................................ ..................................................................................................................... Limulopteryx loebli Hall, 2003 View in CoL
Material Examined. Holotype: male, “ Cameroon, S.-West Province, Bakingili, N04°03.35’ E009°03.823’, 24–26.V. 2006, 250m, under bark of dry dead standing tree together with termites, V. Grebennikov” (Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes, Ottawa, Canada). Paratype: male, same data as holotype (Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium).
Distribution and Bionomics. Limulopteryx hintelmanni is known from the single locality on the south slope of Mt. Cameroon at about sea level. The type locality of this species is about one kilometre North-East from the point where a 1999 lava flow crossed the Limbe-Bakingili highway. Both known specimens were collected under loose dry bark from a dead standing tree. Termites were the most abundant insects in the sample with well over a thousand specimens; they were identified as Nasutitermes incurvus (Sjöstedt) by Timothy G. Myles (personal communication). About one hundred beetle specimens that were collected included mainly rove beetles (subfamily Aleocharinae and Pselaphinae ) and featherwing beetles (presumably termitophilous Limulopteryx hintelmanni sp. n. and Bambara sp.). The latter species markedly outnumbered specimens of Limulopteryx hintelmanni sp. n. under bark of the termite-infested tree.
Etymology. Patronymic, to commemorate the memory of the late Robert J. H. Hintelmann (Munich, Germany).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |