Mursia africana Galil, 1993
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222930701770786 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DB1A87A0-FFB6-FFBE-FE03-FCB7FEB516EA |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Mursia africana Galil, 1993 |
status |
|
Mursia africana Galil, 1993 View in CoL
( Figures 2A, B View Figure 2 , 3A, B View Figure 3 )
Mursia armata: Barnard 1950, p 356 View in CoL , Figure 67g [not Mursia armata de Haan, 1837 View in CoL ]. Mursia africana Galil 1993, p 352 View in CoL , Figures 1a View Figure 1 , 2a, b View Figure 2 , 3a, b View Figure 3 .
? Mursia africana: Ng et al. 2002, p 356 View in CoL –357.
Material examined South-western Indian Ocean: off Kenya, 01 ° 189–01 ° 209N, 41 ° 569–41 ° 539E, 177–243 m
depth, trawl, 14–15 January 1965, RV Meteor, Cruise 1, St. 158: one male, one juvenile ( SMF 29497); off Mozambique, 15 ° 05.09S, 35 ° 15.39E, depth 210–230 m, shrimp trawl, RV Vitiaz, Cruise 17, St. 2635: one male ( IORAS uncat.); off Kenya, 03 ° 089S, 40 ° 20.59E – 03 ° 079S, 40 ° 219E, depth 250–255 m, 5 September 1974, A. J. Bruce coll.: one male (holotype, RMNH D 30986) GoogleMaps .
Type locality
Off Kenya, Western Indian Ocean.
Type material
See under ‘‘Material examined’’.
Size ( CL × MCW)
Holotype: 30.7× 56.6 mm, LS 59.1 mm; specimen from off Mozambique: 30.4× 53.7 mm, LS 57.3 mm.
Habitat
Trawled at depth range 177–290 m.
Distribution
Along East African coast from Kenya to Mozambique. A record from Thailand by Ng et al. (2002) is questionable, since especially the relative length of the lateral spine is a difficult character to distinguish between M. africana and similar species, such as M. flamma , and use of the key provided by Galil (1993) might lead to misidentifications (see ‘‘Remarks’’).
Remarks
The present specimens agree well with the description of Galil (1993) and the holotype deposited in the RMNH, which has been examined for comparison. Even though M. africana is similar to M. flamma Galil, 1993 , in particular regarding the shape of the Go/2 [compare Figures 3a, b View Figure 3 and 10c, d View Figure 10 in Galil (1993) and our Figure 3A, B View Figure 3 ], the two species are distinguished by the following characters: carapace relatively wider and less convex in M. africana , lacking the additional tubercle between median and mesial branchial row of tubercles which is present in M. flamma ; posterior margin of carapace with flattened, nearly effaced lobes in M. africana and three sharp teeth in M. flamma ; the merus of the cheliped bispinose (but with a minute granular tubercle in addition to the two spines) in M. africana and trispinose in M. flamma . Contrary to the description provided by Galil, the median frontal lobe is more or less triangular in M. africana , while it is more rounded and bulbous in M. flamma .
The relative length of the lateral spines, a character often used for distinction of the species within the genus, however, is subject to considerable size-related variation. In M. africana the LS / CW ratio ranges from 0.35 in small specimens to 0.20 in larger size specimens, while in M. flamma it varies from 0.20 to 0.07. Thus, if this character is used for distinction of the two species the size of the actual specimen needs to be taken into account. Otherwise the use of this character might result in misidentifications.
SMF |
Forschungsinstitut und Natur-Museum Senckenberg |
LS |
Linnean Society of London |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Mursia africana Galil, 1993
Spiridonov, Vassily A. & Apel, Michael 2007 |
Mursia africana:
Ng PKL & Lai JCY & Aungtonya C 2002: 356 |
Mursia armata:
Galil BS 1993: 352 |
Barnard KH 1950: 356 |