Zaischnopsis tubatius (Walker)

Peng, Lingfei, Xiang, Jiawei & Liu, Qifei, 2018, Three new species of Zaischnopsis Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Eupelmidae) from Southern China, with redescription of Zaischnopsis tubatius (Walker), Zootaxa 4524 (2), pp. 200-212 : 207-211

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4524.2.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E0AFC4C6-D889-4E37-A86E-3303609D832D

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5979455

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DB6A87FD-FF86-B22A-73FD-D8EDFB235F55

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Zaischnopsis tubatius (Walker)
status

 

Zaischnopsis tubatius (Walker)

( Figs 30–39 View FIGURES 30‒39 , 43 View FIGURES 40‒43 , 47 View FIGURES 44‒47 , 59–63 View FIGURES 59‒63 )

Eupelmus Tubatius Walker, 1852: 41 View in CoL .

Zaischnopsis tubatia, Gibson, 2005: 111 . Incorrect emendation.

Material examined. Holotype ♀ ( BMNH): [ Hong Kong, China] ( NHMUK010835113 View Materials ); 4♀, all BMNH: Tien Fong Mts, Hainan Prov., 15.V.1983, Bouček ( NHMUK010353625 View Materials ); Haikou , Hainan Prov., 25.V.1983, Bouček ( NHMUK010353626 View Materials ); Tien Fong Mts , Hainan Prov., 12.V.1983, Bouček ( NHMUK010353635 View Materials ); Guangzhou , Guangdong Prov., VI. 1983, Bouček ( NHMUK010353636 View Materials ).

Description. FEMALE. Length about 4.2–4.5 mm. Head with coppery-green metallic luster, vertex dark green ( Figs 30, 32 View FIGURES 30‒39 ); setae of face, gena and occiput white, parascrobal region with one row of white setae ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 30‒39 ), setae of vertex black ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 30‒39 ). Maxillary and labial palpi black ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 30‒39 ). Antennal scape with yellowish-green metallic luster, pedicel and flagellum very dark brown to black ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 30‒39 ). Pronotum with coppery, purple and green metallic luster, setae dark brown ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 30‒39 ); mesoscutum with coppery-blue metallic luster, and with white hair-like setae ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 30‒39 ); prepectus and tegula brown; tegula with dark brown setae ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 30‒39 ); mesopectus dark bluish green, with long white setae arranged linearly along acropleural sulcus, extending to level of about middle of tegula; acropleuron black with dark blue and purple metallic lusters; scutellar-axillar complex black with dark green metallic luster, setae black ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 30‒39 ). Fore wing infuscate beyond level of parastigma and gradually lightened distally, but with hyaline cross-band behind apex of marginal vein with white setae ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 30‒39 ). Legs with femora and tibiae dark brown, protarsus brown, mesotarsus pale yellowish brown with rows of pegs and spur black, metatarsus pale yellowish brown ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 30‒39 ); metatibia dark brown, with white hair-like setae and additionally densely setose with white setae along dorsal surface. Metanotum and propodeum black with dark green metallic luster; propodeum with a patch of white hair-like setae mesad to spiracle and callar region setose lateral to spiracle ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 30‒39 ). Gaster elongate-lanceolate, dark purple with metallic luster; apex of syntergum and ovipositor sheath pale yellowish brown ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 30‒39 ).

Head in frontal view ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 30‒39 ) 1.34× wider than high; in dorsal view ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 30‒39 ) width 1.87× length, with interocular distance 0.20× head width and less than width of eye; in lateral view ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 30‒39 ) with face almost straight, 1.51× higher than long. Eye height 1.51× eye width in lateral view ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 30‒39 ); distance between eyes below 3.74× distance between eyes above ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 30‒39 ); malar space 0.49× eye height ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 30‒39 ); distance between toruli greater than distance between torulus and clypeal margin, and greater than distance between torulus and orbit. OOL: POL: LOL: MPOD = 1: 6: 9: 11. Vertex coriaceous around ocelli, and transversely imbricate posteriorly ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 30‒39 ); lower face reticulate-rugose; gena longitudinally reticulate ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 30‒39 ); parascrobal region very narrow; scrobal depression reticulate and transversely imbricate; interantennal region transversely reticulate-imbricate ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 30‒39 ). Scrobal depression deep, separated from anterior ocellus by distance equal to 0.63× diameter of anterior ocellus. Lower orbit above ventral margin of torulus. Antenna with scape foliaceously dilated ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 30‒39 ); relative length (width) of scape = 40(16); pedicel 9(5); 1 st to 8 th funiculars: 5.5(5.5), 18(5), 18(6), 21(9), 15(10), 12(11), 10(11), 9(11); clava 25(12).

Pronotum in dorsal view divided medially, pentagonal, transversely imbricate ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 30‒39 ). Mesoscutum almost flat but slightly convex anteriorly, lateral lobe carinate posteriorly ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 30‒39 ). Scutellar-axillar complex flat, longitudinally, coarsely reticulate, with black setae; scutellum 1.24× longer than broad ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 30‒39 ). Mesopectus meshlike reticulate, acropleuron with very fine longitudinally aligned coriaceous sculpture. Fore wing extended near apex of gaster, with SMV: MV: PMV: STV = 25: 31: 22: 8. Mesotibial spur shorter than basitarsus; mesotarsus with row of pegs on either side of basal four segments. Hind leg with basitarsus as long as following two tarsomeres combined ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 30‒39 ). Propodeum with anterior margin broadly convex ( Figs 39 View FIGURES 30‒39 , 47 View FIGURES 44‒47 , indicated by arrows); plical region sublinear; callar region smooth and shiny ( Figs 36, 39 View FIGURES 30‒39 , 47 View FIGURES 44‒47 ).

Gaster longer than mesosoma, elongate-lanceolate ( Figs 38 View FIGURES 30‒39 , 43 View FIGURES 40‒43 ); Gt 1 and Gt 2 deeply V-like emarginate, Gt 3 broadly U-like emarginate, Gt 4 –Gt 6 shallowly emarginate, syntergum tapered to rounded apex ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 40‒43 ); ovipositor sheath exserted for very short distance, as long as 1/2 of basal metatarsomere ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 30‒39 ).

Distribution. CHINA: Guangdong, Hainan, Hong Kong.

Remarks. The dorsal margin of the metatibia of Z. tubatius females appears white ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 30‒39 ), but it is actually black ( Figs 37 View FIGURES 30‒39 , 60 View FIGURES 59‒63 ) except dorsally it is densely setose with white setae. The holotype is in very poor condition, with only the mesosoma, four legs and part of one fore wing remaining ( Figs 59–63 View FIGURES 59‒63 ). Actually, the head was missing already when Walker (1852) described the species. The middle of the propodeum of the holotype has a very narrow plical region ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 59‒63 ), and the metatibia is densely setose dorsally as described above.

Gibson (2005), when transferring the species from Eupelmus to Zaischnopsis , changed the specific epithet to tubatia . However, tubatius is a noun in apposition as indicated by the use of a capital letter for the species epithet in the original description. According to ICZN Art. 31.2.1 the species name should remain unchanged.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Eupelmidae

Genus

Zaischnopsis

Loc

Zaischnopsis tubatius (Walker)

Peng, Lingfei, Xiang, Jiawei & Liu, Qifei 2018
2018
Loc

Zaischnopsis tubatia, Gibson, 2005 : 111

Gibson, G. A. P. 2005: 111
2005
Loc

Eupelmus Tubatius Walker, 1852 : 41

Walker, F. 1852: 41
1852
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF