Afrokeroplatus, Ševčík & Mantič & Blagoderov, 2015

Ševčík, Jan, Mantič, Michal & Blagoderov, Vladimir, 2015, Two new genera of Keroplatidae (Diptera), with an updated key to the World genera of Keroplatini, Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 55 (1), pp. 387-399 : 388

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5302583

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:040E5A36-D76F-4297-AB29-3AE82073A52BU

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5331148

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DD3187C6-316C-FFA5-FE4B-DAD152E9F9DF

treatment provided by

Marcus

scientific name

Afrokeroplatus
status

gen. nov.

Afrokeroplatus View in CoL View at ENA gen. nov.

Type species. Afrokeroplatus ashleyi View in CoL sp. nov., here designated.

Diagnosis. A medium-sized keroplatid fungus gnat with unmarked wings and remarkably pectinate antennae ( Figs 1, 2 View Figs 1–2 ). Mouthparts reduced, including the labellum, palpus with two short palpomeres. Thorax without distinct subscutellar membranous area. Wing ( Fig. 3 View Fig ) covered with microtrichia, without macrotrichia. Vein R 4 relatively long, oblique. Stem of M-fork shorter than r-m. Vein M 1 distally bent posteriorly. Both Cu 1 (= CuA of some authors) and A 1 (= CuP of some authors) strong, reaching wing margin. Tibia with setae forming distinct longitudinal rows and with several sparsely distributed short setae. Gonostylus with two strong apical teeth.

Differential diagnosis. The new genus is characterised by its pectinate antennae in combination with unmarked wings, reduced mouthparts, bare laterotergites, tibial trichia in regular rows, and by its wing venation. Within the group of genera of Keroplatini with pectinate antennae, bare laterotergites and tibial trichia in rows (see couplets 6 to 9 in the key below), it may be distinguished by the absence of the subscutellar membranous area, and by unmarked wings with the stem of M-fork shorter than r-m fusion, the long and oblique R 4, and M 1 bent posteriorly. Interestingly, most of the wing characters correspond to those of Macrocera Meigen, 1803 or Hesperodes Coquillett, 1900 (e.g. short stem of M-fork, long and oblique R 4, strong A 1 reaching wing margin, parallel and bent M 1 and M 2), but in Afrokeroplatus gen. nov. the veins M 4 and Cu 1 are not so close to each other basally and Sc is shorter, not reaching the level of r-m fusion. Also the structure of the antennae and head is different from those in Macrocerinae . Concerning the male terminalia, the gonostylus with two strong apical teeth is similar to the Afrotropical Orfeliini genera Asynaphleba Matile, 1974 and Schizocyttara Matile, 1974 , as well as in many taxa of Macrocerini .

Etymology. The generic name is derived from Africa, referring to its distribution, and Keroplatus Bosc, 1792 , a related genus. Gender is masculine.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Keroplatidae

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF