Cleopus verbasci Dufour, 1843
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.281230 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6169020 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DD3F87C1-FFA0-FF9C-0BD4-EDDCFE15FC16 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cleopus verbasci Dufour, 1843 |
status |
|
Cleopus verbasci Dufour, 1843 View in CoL
Cleopus verbasci View in CoL was quoted by Dufour (1843) as being described by Fabricius, but the name had not been used in this combination by any previous author. Fabricius (1787) actually described Curculio verbasci View in CoL [currently Cionus View in CoL and synonymous with C. tuberculosus (Scopoli, 1763) View in CoL ], which Dufour reported on the same page as Cionus View in CoL . Certainly Dufour followed Dejean (1821) who cited a Cionus verbasci View in CoL (surely the above Fabrician species) from “Paris”, and immediately below a Cleopus verbasci View in CoL (attributed to “Meg.[erle] Rossi?” from “ Gal.[lia] mer.[idionalis]”). Since, however, Dejean did not write any description, Dufour is the author of this species (type locality: Vallée d'Ossau, French Pirenees), as correctly reported by Desbrochers des Loges (1893), Zumpt (1933) and Klima (1934). This taxon was described by Dufour very briefly after some species of Cionus View in CoL and quoted as being collected on Verbascum View in CoL . Desbrochers des Loges (1893) placed Cleopus verbasci View in CoL among the synonyms of R. vestita ( Germar, 1821) View in CoL without explanation, a decision followed by Zumpt (1933) and Klima (1934). Péricart (1973) reported that there are no syntypes of this taxon in Dufour's collection at MNHN, but stated that the synonymy with R. vestita View in CoL is very doubtful on the basis of the host plant ( R. vestita View in CoL lives on Antirrhinum majus View in CoL ) and the brief description. We agree with Péricart's opinion and consider Cleopus verbasci View in CoL as synonymous with R. tetra View in CoL . This position is corroborated by the arguments reported below with regard to Cleopus uncinatus . Therefore, following the provisions of the Article 75 of the ICZN (1999), with the express purpose of clarifying taxonomic status of this taxon, we designate a neotype for Cleopus verbasci Dufour View in CoL which agrees with R. tetra View in CoL . It is deposited at MNHN and has the following label data: “ France, Bilhères d'Ossau, 4.VIII.2011, sur Verbascum blattariae L., leg. P. Weill & J. Pelletier [printed on white card] / Neotype, Cleopus verbasci Dufour View in CoL , des. R. Caldara 2011 [printed on red card]”. This specimen is a male, 3.0 mm long (rostrum excluded), in good condition and glued on a white rectangular card. The type locality of this taxon becomes now France, Pyrénées-Atlantiques, Bilhères d'Ossau.
It should be noted that the name verbasci Dufour View in CoL in the genus Rhinusa View in CoL is a secondary homonym with R. verbasci ( Rosenschoeld, 1838) View in CoL .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cleopus verbasci Dufour, 1843
Caldara, Roberto, Casalini, Roberto & Baviera, Cosimo 2012 |
R. verbasci (
Rosenschoeld 1838 |
R. vestita (
Germar 1821 |
C. tuberculosus
Scopoli 1763 |