Cleopus verbasci Dufour, 1843

Caldara, Roberto, Casalini, Roberto & Baviera, Cosimo, 2012, Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the Rhinusa tetra (Fabricius) species complex (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), Zootaxa 3329, pp. 31-40 : 34

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.281230

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6169020

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DD3F87C1-FFA0-FF9C-0BD4-EDDCFE15FC16

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Cleopus verbasci Dufour, 1843
status

 

Cleopus verbasci Dufour, 1843 View in CoL

Cleopus verbasci View in CoL was quoted by Dufour (1843) as being described by Fabricius, but the name had not been used in this combination by any previous author. Fabricius (1787) actually described Curculio verbasci View in CoL [currently Cionus View in CoL and synonymous with C. tuberculosus (Scopoli, 1763) View in CoL ], which Dufour reported on the same page as Cionus View in CoL . Certainly Dufour followed Dejean (1821) who cited a Cionus verbasci View in CoL (surely the above Fabrician species) from “Paris”, and immediately below a Cleopus verbasci View in CoL (attributed to “Meg.[erle] Rossi?” from “ Gal.[lia] mer.[idionalis]”). Since, however, Dejean did not write any description, Dufour is the author of this species (type locality: Vallée d'Ossau, French Pirenees), as correctly reported by Desbrochers des Loges (1893), Zumpt (1933) and Klima (1934). This taxon was described by Dufour very briefly after some species of Cionus View in CoL and quoted as being collected on Verbascum View in CoL . Desbrochers des Loges (1893) placed Cleopus verbasci View in CoL among the synonyms of R. vestita ( Germar, 1821) View in CoL without explanation, a decision followed by Zumpt (1933) and Klima (1934). Péricart (1973) reported that there are no syntypes of this taxon in Dufour's collection at MNHN, but stated that the synonymy with R. vestita View in CoL is very doubtful on the basis of the host plant ( R. vestita View in CoL lives on Antirrhinum majus View in CoL ) and the brief description. We agree with Péricart's opinion and consider Cleopus verbasci View in CoL as synonymous with R. tetra View in CoL . This position is corroborated by the arguments reported below with regard to Cleopus uncinatus . Therefore, following the provisions of the Article 75 of the ICZN (1999), with the express purpose of clarifying taxonomic status of this taxon, we designate a neotype for Cleopus verbasci Dufour View in CoL which agrees with R. tetra View in CoL . It is deposited at MNHN and has the following label data: “ France, Bilhères d'Ossau, 4.VIII.2011, sur Verbascum blattariae L., leg. P. Weill & J. Pelletier [printed on white card] / Neotype, Cleopus verbasci Dufour View in CoL , des. R. Caldara 2011 [printed on red card]”. This specimen is a male, 3.0 mm long (rostrum excluded), in good condition and glued on a white rectangular card. The type locality of this taxon becomes now France, Pyrénées-Atlantiques, Bilhères d'Ossau.

It should be noted that the name verbasci Dufour View in CoL in the genus Rhinusa View in CoL is a secondary homonym with R. verbasci ( Rosenschoeld, 1838) View in CoL .

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Curculionidae

Genus

Cleopus

Loc

Cleopus verbasci Dufour, 1843

Caldara, Roberto, Casalini, Roberto & Baviera, Cosimo 2012
2012
Loc

R. verbasci (

Rosenschoeld 1838
1838
Loc

R. vestita (

Germar 1821
1821
Loc

C. tuberculosus

Scopoli 1763
1763
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF