Pteronarcys dorsata, MS, 2000
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4758579 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4759087 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DE1AD619-FFDB-F567-CAD9-7845FE7B0A6E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pteronarcys dorsata |
status |
|
Pteronarcys dorsata View in CoL .
Fifty-one and six signals were obtained from one, 2–3-day old male and female, respectively, at 24°C and 65 FTC. The male and female of this species produced 2-way sequenced signals with either the female answer following the call (N=13), or with the answer beats interspersed within the call, beginning during the male’s 4 th (N=3), 5 th (N= 13) and 6 th (N=6) interval. The male called with signals of 6 mode beats; with intervals of 251.9 ± 9.6 ms ( Fig. 13 View Figs , Table 3). His average individual intervals gradually decreased from 258.3 ms (i1) to 241.6 ms (i6), the last interval increased to 245.6 ms (N=2) ( Table 4). Mode and mean beats per female signal were 5 and 4.9 ± 0.8; with intervals of 359.7 ± 45.9 ms. The ♂ - ♀ exchange interval was 141.1 ± 85.5 ms for sequenced and overlapped duets.
The results here coincide well with those of Stewart et al. (1982), with slight differences probably attributed to variation in environmental inputs rather than a new dialect. We add the interspersed female answer signal to the description of this species signaling.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |