Oodera longicollis (Cameron, 1903)

Werner, Jennifer & Peters, Ralph S., 2018, Taxonomic revision of the genus Oodera Westwood, 1874 (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Pteromalidae, Cleonyminae), with description of ten new species, Journal of Hymenoptera Research 63, pp. 73-123 : 99

publication ID	https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.63.12754
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2A715390-E97E-4107-A34B-B4A3A3355753
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DE8DE905-101C-72FF-E7CE-1C1C74ABC473
treatment provided by	Journal of Hymenoptera Research by Pensoft
scientific name	Oodera longicollis (Cameron, 1903)
status

Treatment

Oodera longicollis (Cameron, 1903) View in CoL Figs 3e View Figure 3 , 6e View Figure 6 , 9e View Figure 9 , 12e View Figure 12 , 15e View Figure 15

Epistenia longicollis Cameron, 1903: 98.

Oodera longicollis ; Hedqvist 1961: 97.

Oodera ornata Gahan, 1925: 97. Synonymy with Oodera longicollis and lectotype designation by Bouček et al. (1978: 448-449).

Diagnosis.

BOTH SEXES (N = 14). Head and mesosoma bright green to blue and blackish. Fore wing partly infumate. Body robust to slender (mesonotum 1.28-1.45 × as long as wide). Head oval to elongated (1.57-1.72 × as high as long). Eyes large (0.60-0.65 × as high as head) (Fig. 9e View Figure 9 ). Corona medium to slim (5.33-7.38 × as long as wide), structure square (Fig. 6e View Figure 6 ). Pronotum pentagonal with posterior part distinctly narrowing towards mesoscutum, with broadest part at midlength (Fig. 12e View Figure 12 ). Mesoscutellum normal to slender (0.68-0.80 × as long as wide), anterior margin usually convex (part anterior to imaginary transverse line connecting posterior margins of axillae more than 1/3 of mesoscutellum length; 0.29-0.45, with only 3 of 13 with anterior margin hardly convex), mesoscutellum completely lineate, with median lines converging (Fig. 15e View Figure 15 ). Profemur usually elongated (2.14-2.58 × as long as wide, with only 1 of 14 with profemur medium). Marginal vein medium to long (1.05-1.18 × as long as postmarginal vein).

FEMALE. Medium- to large-sized (8.80-12.60 mm). Propodeum medium to large (0.12-0.22 × as long as mesoscutum) (Fig. 15e View Figure 15 ). Metasoma short to long (0.44-0.54 × as long as body). Ovipositor long (0.26-035 × as long as metasoma) (Fig. 3e View Figure 3 ).

MALE. Small- to medium-sized (5.38-9.6 mm). Propodeum very large (0.26 to 0.34 × as long as mesoscutum).

Redescription.

BOTH SEXES. Colour (Figs 3e View Figure 3 , 6e View Figure 6 , 9e View Figure 9 , 12e View Figure 12 , 15e View Figure 15 ). Scape green, rest of antenna dark brown. Procoxa yellow, profemur yellow and green, all other parts of legs irregularly dark brown and yellow. Metasoma dark brown.

Head (Figs 6e View Figure 6 , 9e View Figure 9 ). Face transversely striate from parascrobal area at lower third of eye height to clypeus margin. Head 1.59-1.79 × as wide as long. Head width 4.00-5.19 × eye distance. Malar space 0.34-0.40 × head height. Corona 0.52-0.59 × as long as eye height. POL 1.0-1.67 × OOL. Scape 1.69-2.78 × as long as pedicel. Clava 0.10-0.25 × as long as funicle. Flagellum 1.31-1.85 × as long as head width.

Mesosoma (Figs 12e View Figure 12 , 15e View Figure 15 ). Pronotum 0.95-1.11 × as long as wide. Pronotum 0.52-0.69 × as long as mesonotum. Mesonotum 1.36-1.47 × as long as mesoscutum. Mesoscutum 0.92-1.05 × as long as wide. Mesoscutellum 0.36-0.48 × as long as mesoscutum. Profemur 1.25-1.50 × as long as protibia.

Wings (Fig. 3e View Figure 3 ). Fore wing 2.85-3.78 × as long as wide. Costal cell 0.33-0.38 × as long as fore wing. Marginal vein 0.19-0.21 × as long as fore wing. Marginal vein 2.98-4.19 × as long as stigmal vein. Postmarginal vein 2.60-3.70 × as long as stigmal vein.

Material examined.

ASIA. China: female, Matang Rd, 18.05.1920, det. C. R. Vardy (1962) (BMNH) (OLo10); Malaysia: female, Sandakan, det. Z. Bouček (1980) (BMNH) (OLo01); female, Quop, Sarawak, leg. G.E. Bryant, 06.03.1914, det. Z. Bouček (1976) (BMNH) (OLo04); female, Perak, leg. K. Staudinger, det. Z. Bouček (1976) (BMNH) (OLo05); female, Bettotan near Sandakan, 20.08.1927, det. Z. Bouček (1976) (BMNH) (OLo09); female, Perak, det. Z. Bouček (1960) as Oodera sp., later as O. ornata by anonymous (BMNH) (OLo13); male, Negeri, Sembilan Pasoh Forest , leg. E. Jendek & O. Sausa, 10- 21.06.2013 (CNC) (OLo02); Myanmar:? sex, Burma, Bilumyo Res., Mytikyina , leg. D.J. Atkinson, 31.05.1928, det. Z. Bouček (1976) (BMNH) (OLo06); male, Manymar, Yeni Res. Pyinmana, leg. D.H. Desai, 29.06.1934, det. Z. Bouček (1980) (BMNH) (OLo07); Philippines: female holotype O. ornata , Davao on Island Mindanao, leg. Baker (examined from images provided by the USNM, http://usnmhymtypes.com/default.asp?Action=Show_ Types & Single _Type=True&TypeID=7233, accessed 20/01/2017); female, Davao in Island Mindanao, leg. Baker, det. Ch. Ferriere as O. ornata (BMNH) (OLo03); female, Surigao, Mindanao, det. as O. ornata by anonymous (BMNH) (OLo11); male, Island of Basilan, det. as O. ornata by anonymous (BMNH) (OLo12); Vietnam: male, Tonkin, Hoabinh, leg. R.V.de Salvaza, 8.1918, det. Ch. Ferriere as Heydenia longicollis , second location label says "Indo China" (BMNH) (OLo08) .

Biology.

Associated with teak ( Tectona grandis ) ( Verbenaceae ), presumably as habitat for the parasitoids’ host (unverified record taken from Noyes (2017)).

Distribution.

China (Oriental part), Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Vietnam.

Taxonomic remarks.

Oodera ornata was synonymised with O. longicollis by Bouček et al. (1978); this was confirmed by us after examining the images of O. ornata available online (for exact reference see examined material).

Gahan (1925) compared O. ornata and O. gracilis and declared them similar, except for the different ovipositor lengths and some colour differences ( O. ornata "can be distinguished from that species [ Oodera gracilis ] at once by the much shorter ovipositor and the differently coloured legs"). After examining material of both species we found many more distinguishing characters (see diagnoses and key).

The species description of O. ornata by Gahan (1925: 97) points out that O. ornata (= O. longicollis ) is a species of "rather variable size". He characterised a specimen from Borneo as the smallest (body length: 7 mm) and a specimen from Mindanao (Phillipines) as the largest specimen (body length: 12 mm). We confirm the large size differences after examining the available material from various countries (smallest: 5.38 mm, largest: 12.6 mm). We see these large intraspecific size differences in both Oodera species for which we were able to examine a considerable number of specimens not originating from the same series and with both sexes available (i.e., O. formosa and O. longicollis ). Comparable differences might also be found for other species of Oodera if more specimens are examined. Because of this we use body length in the diagnoses and key but avoid using it as an exclusive character. This still holds a certain risk that users of the key will have difficulties to identify specimens of extreme body length. However, we think that body length is such an obvious character that it should be mentioned in identification keys. If the key might fail in rare cases, all specimens should be assignable to a certain species with the diagnoses provided.

Note that we located one additional specimen in the Australian National Insect Collection in Canberra (ANIC). It originated from the same series as specimens already included here (from Philippines, Davao/Mindanao). O. longicollis is a well-defined species and we did not borrow and include this additional specimen.