Tmeticus ornatus (Emerton, 1914)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.59.508 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DEBB7ED6-8B15-BF02-CB95-BE7855538D0A |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Tmeticus ornatus (Emerton, 1914) |
status |
|
Tmeticus ornatus (Emerton, 1914) View in CoL Figs 1721 –2245– 485154
Gongylidium ornatus Emerton 1914: 263, pl. 8, f. 3 (♂).
Tmeticus ornatus : Bishop and Crosby 1935: 227, pl. 18, f. 22-26 (♂♀).
Tmeticus ornatus : Paquin and Dupérré 2003: 122, f. 1284-1286 (♂♀).
Material examined.
CANADA: 4♂ 4♀ (ZMMU), Saskatchewan, Lady Lake, sedge tops - flooded marsh, 13-15.04.1971 (D.J. Buckle); 3♂ 3♀ (ZMUT), same locality, marsh, late April, 1978 (J.V. Buckle).
Diagnosis.
Differs from Tmeticus affinis , which also occurs in the Nearctic Region, by the carapace colour (black cephalic region and red-orange thoracic area in Tmeticus ornatus , carapace uniformly brown in Tmeticus affinis ). The males are easily separated by their tibial apophyses (one apophysis with a claw-like processes in Tmeticus affinis and two separate apophyses in Tmeticus ornatus ); the females have distinctly different epigynes.
Description.
♂ 2.5-3.3, ♀ 2.8-35. TmI 0.73-0.78. Carapace orange with darker cephalic region. Abdomen dark. Palp as in Figs 45-46, 51, 54. Epigyne as in Figs 17, 47-48.
Distribution.
This species has a trans-Nearctic distribution, recorded from British Columbia to Quebec and south to New York ( Buckle et al. 2001). It does not occur north of 55°N and has a more southern distribution in comparison to the Palaearctic Tmeticus affinis , Tmeticus tolli and Tmeticus nigriceps .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |