Moiradiomus lachesis, Vandenberg & Hanson, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4554.1.9 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A804E949-109A-468D-B58B-CF7C8BCB3059 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5921886 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DF18F971-FFD0-0B3E-FF4B-FD886E60BEA0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Moiradiomus lachesis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Moiradiomus lachesis sp. nov.
( Figs. 15, 16 View FIGURES 13–16 , 26 View FIGURES 25–28 , 30 View FIGURES 29–32 , 40 View FIGURES 40–42 )
Diagnosis. This species is readily distinguished from its congeners by the male genitalia ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 29–32 ) which are most similar to those of M. atropos except the basal lobe is nearly flat in lateral view with apex weakly sinuous and parameres apically rounded. In addition, the adult head is smaller relative to the pronotum ( Fig. 15, 16 View FIGURES 13–16 ) than in the other known species. The prosternal carinae ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 25–28 ) are more strongly convergent, framing a subtriangular depression with attenuate, narrowly rounded apex. It is also distinguished by its larval host plant: P. lanosibracteum Trelease, 1929 .
Description of holotype (male) ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 13–16 ). Length 1.9 mm, width 1.1 mm. Form elongate, oval, weakly convex. Metathoracic wing present. Dorsal surfaces feebly shining, distinctly punctate, pubescent with fimbriate borders. Head, pronotum, appendages including mouthparts, straw yellow, with meso- metacoxae slightly darkened; pronotum with indistinct darker dapples in median area near base; elytron medium brown with apex narrowly yellow; scutellar shield paler yellow brown with margins narrowly darkened; elytral epipleuron yellow brown; pubescence shiny, off white. Venter predominantly brown, darkest on meso-, metaventrite; prosternum pale yellow; mesepimeron, mesepisternum paler than surrounding sclerites with margins narrowly darkened; abdominal ventrite 3 pale yellow brown, ventrites 4–6 yellow; tarsal claw, mandibular apex dark reddish amber. Dorsal punctation moderately coarse; punctures separated by approximately 1× diameter, on elytron equal in width to eye facet, finer on head, pronotum. Dorsal pubescence semi erect, moderately dense, evenly distributed, lacking distinct setal pattern; individual setae equal to about 2/3 to 1× length of scutellar shield, arcuate; elytral setae mostly directed posteriorly except directed outwardly at sides of body, posterolaterally near suture. Head moderate sized, 0.62× width of pronotum; eye large, finely facetted, with interfacetal setae, weakly notched near antennal insertion by small rounded ocular canthus; inner orbits arcuate, strongly diverging toward vertex, weakly diverging toward clypeus, with minimum separation at slightly below midlength; interocular distance 1.6× width of eye in frontal view. Antenna composed of 10 antennomeres; antennomere 3 elongate, about 2.0× length of antennomere 4; last 4 antennomeres forming gradual club expanding apically from antennomere 7–9; antennomere 10 subrhomboidal, slightly narrower, slightly longer than 9. Maxillary palp with terminal palpomere short, strongly expanded distally; with oblique apex. Pronotum transverse, width 2.4× length, weakly, evenly convex. Elytron in dorsal view with lateral margin weakly arcuate; elytral apices dehiscent. Ventral surfaces pubescent, distinctly punctate, except glabrous, impunctate in posterior 4/5ths of metacoxal plate; punctation coarser, denser on abdomen. Prosternum ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 25–28 ) with carinae of intercoxal process extending nearly to apex, strongly convergent, framing subtriangular depression with attenuate, narrowly rounded apex. Suture between abdominal ventrites 1 and 2 distinct, linear; 5 th, 6 th ventrite with apex shallowly, roundly emarginate in median ½. Tarsal claw with broad scythe-like inner tooth extending from base to apical 1/3 rd or beyond
Male genitalia ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 29–32 ). Basal lobe ( Fig. 30b View FIGURES 29–32 ) in ventral view weakly, evenly tapered toward oblique apex, with small thorn-like process at distal most point, distinctly shorter than paramere; in lateral view ( Fig. 30a View FIGURES 29–32 ) weakly sinuous, with apex curving upwards; paramere elongate, gradually expanded, apically rounded, about 3.0× as long as wide, distinctly longer than longest setae. Penis ( Fig. 30c View FIGURES 29–32 ) lacking apical flagellum, slender with wedge-shaped capsule.
Female ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 13–16 ). Similar to male except less elongate, slightly smaller on average, moderately convex; brown areas darker brown, more extensive than in male; scutellar shield same color as elytron; elytral epipleuron dark brown, pronotum dark brown with anterior, anterolateral margins diffusely lighter, yellowish; prosternum, mesepimeron, mesepisternum medium brown. 5 th abdominal ventrite with posterior margin truncate; 6 th ventrite with posterior margin arcuate. Tarsal claw with short triangular tooth near base, not extending beyond apical ½.
Variation. Length 1.5–2.0 mm. Individuals vary slightly in the extent and degree of dark pigmentation on dorsal and ventral surfaces. Scutellar shield may be same color as elytron or distinctly paler.
Trophic relations. Larvae develop on food bodies of P. lanosibracteum ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 40–42 ).
Etymology. Lachesis, proper noun in apposition. Classical Latin from Ancient Greek Λάχεσις (Lakhesis), literally, lot; from lanchanein, to obtain by lot or fate, happen. In Greek mythology, one of the three Fates, or Moirae, who determines the length of the thread of life and a person’s allotment of misery and suffering.
Type material. Holotype (male) with labels: “ COSTA RICA: San José : Zurqui de Moravia, 1600m 28.III.2014, P. Hanson / ex. Piper lanosibracteum ” ( USNM) and 5 paratypes (2 males, 3 females) with same labels as holotype (2, USNM; 3, MZUCR).
USNM |
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |