Cerozodus inesperatus, Montanuci & Vieira & Krolow, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1590/1678-4766e2023008 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11103012 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DF3F87C4-FFFC-FFAA-FC51-5E2DA4EDF9EA |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Cerozodus inesperatus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Cerozodus inesperatus sp. nov.
( Figs 2–23 View Figs 2–5 View Figs 6–11 View Figs 12–20 View Figs 21–23 )
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2759FA81-34CA-4C69-ABDA-DA55D4920D47
Diagnosis. Postpedicel rounded ( Fig. 6 View Figs 6–11 ); stylus about three times the postpedicel length ( Fig. 6 View Figs 6–11 ); sternite 8 with tongue-shaped projection on the posterior margin ( Figs 9, 11 View Figs 6–11 , 12, 14, 17 View Figs 12–20 ); hypandrium with straight margin, without projection ( Figs 9, 11 View Figs 6–11 , 12, 14, 15 View Figs 12–20 ); epandrium with an apical small pointed projection internally ( Figs 10, 11 View Figs 6–11 , 13, 14, 18, 19 View Figs 12–20 ); epandrium curving inward apically, forming a subtriangular apical cavity in ventral view ( Figs 11 View Figs 6–11 , 14, 19 View Figs 12–20 ); cercus cone-shaped ( Figs 13, 18–20 View Figs 12–20 ); gonocoxite with apical margin rounded ( Figs 9, 11 View Figs 6–11 , 12, 14 View Figs 12–20 ); gonostylus narrow and slender ( Figs 11 View Figs 6–11 , 12, 14 View Figs 12–20 ).
Holotype ♂. Body length: 13 mm; wing: 9 mm. Head ( Figs 4, 5 View Figs 2–5 ). Light brown; scape and pedicel light brown ( Fig. 6 View Figs 6–11 ), with yellow ventral and black dorsal setae; postpedicel dark brown and rounded; stylus black and about three times the postpedicel length ( Fig 6 View Figs 6–11 ); basal projection of the stylus gray tomentose in the middle; two black ocellar setae; three black orbital setae; frons and face black, golden tomentose; mystax with white and black macrosetae; palpus with black setae; proboscis black with yellow setae at apex; labial setae yellowish; occiput black, whitish tomentose; three black postocular macrosetae.
Thorax ( Figs 2, 3 View Figs 2–5 , 8 View Figs 6–11 ). Light brown; antepronotum and postpronotum dark brown, golden tomentose; scutum brown, golden tomentose; median stripe light brown; paramedian stripe brown; pleura dark brown, golden tomentose; two black notopleural macrosetae; one black supraalar macroseta; one black postalar macroseta; three pairs of thick, black postsutural dorsocentral macrosetae; scutellum gray, without marginal scutellar macrosetae ( Fig. 8 View Figs 6–11 ); discal scutellar setae whitish; katatergal macrosetae whitish; setae on posterior meron+metanepisternum whitish.
Wings ( Figs 2, 3 View Figs 2–5 , 7 View Figs 6–11 ). Translucent, slightly brown; dark brown veins; without costal dilatation; bifurcation of veins R 4 and R 5 placed beyond apex of discal cell; transverse vein r-m situated beyond middle of disc cell; microtrichia on posterior wing margin arranged in a single plane; halteres light yellow.
Legs ( Figs 2, 3 View Figs 2–5 ). Yellowish; femur reddish dorsally; fore tibiae yellow; mid and hind tibiae yellow with a reddish apex; fore tarsi yellow; mid and hind tarsi reddish-yellow; pulvilli yellowish; empodia reddish-yellow; claws shiny black. Chaetotaxy: hind trochanter with three white macrosetae ventrally, two long macrosetae posteroventrally and one short macroseta medioventrally; fore and hind coxae with a row of long white macrosetae posterodorsally; hind coxa with two macrosetae dorsomedially and three macrosetae ventroapically; mid and hind femora covered by white setae alternating with black; fore and mid femora with 7-9 whitish macrosetae ventrally; hind femur with four black macrosetae lateroventrally, one black macroseta dorsomedially, two black macrosetae anterodorsally and two black macrosetae dorsoapically; femora with white and black setae laterally; femora with whitish setae dorsally; tibiae with black macrosetae; fore and mid tibiae with short, scattered white setae; hind tibiae with a row of short white setae; tarsomeres with black setae and macrosetae; first and second tarsomeres with a row of golden setae.
Abdomen ( Figs 2, 3 View Figs 2–5 ). Tergite 1 with anterior half dark brown and posterior half light brown, gray tomentose; tergite 1 with a row of whitish marginal setae and macrosetae laterally and with whitish setae dorsally on the posterior margin; tergites 2-3 dark brown, gray tomentose; tergites 2 and 4 with whitish macrosetae laterally and black setae dorsally; tergites 4-8 reddish-brown with whitish marginal setae; sternites reddish-brown with short, sparse, whitish macrosetae; tergite 8 dorsally with black macrosetae apically; sternite 8 with whitish-yellow setae; sternite 8 with tongue-shaped projection on the posterior margin ( Figs 9, 11–14 View Figs 6–11 View Figs 12–20 ).
Terminalia ( Figs 9–20 View Figs 6–11 View Figs 12–20 ). Light brown, except epandrium and gonocoxite dark brown dorsobasally; hypandrium with eight or nine black macrosetae apically and laterally; hypandrium with straight posterior margin, without projection ( Figs 9, 11 View Figs 6–11 , 12, 14, 15 View Figs 12–20 ); epandrium with black and yellow setae dorsally, and black macrosetae ventrally at apex; epandrium with a dorsal curvature in lateral view ( Figs 9 View Figs 6–11 , 12, 20 View Figs 12–20 ); epandrium with an apical small pointed projection internally ( Figs 10, 11 View Figs 6–11 , 13, 14, 18, 19 View Figs 12–20 ); epandrium curving inward apically, forming a subtriangular apical cavity in ventral view ( Figs 11 View Figs 6–11 , 14, 19 View Figs 12–20 ); cercus cone-shaped ( Figs 13, 18 View Figs 12–20 ); gonocoxite with apical margin rounded ( Figs 9, 11 View Figs 6–11 , 12, 14 View Figs 12–20 ); gonostylus narrow and slender ( Figs 11 View Figs 6–11 , 12, 14 View Figs 12–20 ); ejaculatory apodeme long and wide apically ( Figs 12, 13 View Figs 12–20 ).
Holotype condition. Left antenna missing, without the postpedicel and the stylus. Few mystacal macrosetae broken. Part of the abdomen and terminalia in microtube with glycerin. Microtube pinned under the specimen.
♀. Similar to ♂, except by: body length: 14 mm; antenna with second article of stylus without broad basal projection ( Fig. 21 View Figs 21–23 ); wing length: 10 mm; Color of legs lighter; tibiae with a darker apex; darker tarsi; abdomen reddish-brown; tergite 2 gray with a dark spot on the posterior half; terminalia shiny black ( Figs 22, 23 View Figs 21–23 ); tergite 8 with a yellow lateral spot at the base; sternite 8 with a yellow lateral spot at the base and a rounded one in the middle; cercus dark brown with yellow setae.
Variations. Male paratype with two yellow occipital macrosetae; body length 12. 5 mm and wing length 8 mm.
Etymology. inesperatus from Latin, refers to something unexpected.
Distribution. State of Tocantins, Brazil.
Biology/phenology. The specimens were collected in the district of Taquaruçu, a tourist region of Palmas, capital of Tocantins. It is a mountainous region, with valleys, plains and cliffs with elevations ranging from 34 to 960 m ( SEPLAN, 2003). This area has a rich vegetation, with typical cerrado, gallery forest and riparian forest. The climate is semi-humid tropical, with seasonally well-defined rainfall periods, with a hot and dry winter (May to September) and a rainy season (October to April) ( MARCUZZO & GOULARTE, 2013). The specimens were found in riparian forests of an Environmental Protection Area called Serra do Lajeado, being captured with a Malaise trap both in the dry and rainy seasons. The data obtained here corroborate the information presented by CAMARGO et al. (2022), in relation to the distribution patterns of the other species of the genus.
Type material. Holotype ♂, BRASIL, TO[CANTINS], Palmas , Taquaruçu , Faz [enda] Encantada , 10°14’41.79”S; 48°7’22.79”W, 15-22.IV.2012, Malaise, Krolow, T. K. & GoogleMaps Lima, I. L. H. ( INPA) / Holotype Cerozodus inesperatus det. Montanuci, P. S.B, 2021 . Paratypes. Same data as holotype except: 26.X-02.XI.2012 (♂ CEUFT / 004816 ) ; 03-10. VIII.2012 (♀ INPA) ; 07-14.IX.2012 (♀ CEUFT / 004819 ) .
Discussion. Cerozodus was recently reviewed by CAMARGO et al. (2022) and currently has four valid species. Cerozodus inesperatus sp. nov. runs to step 2 of the key by CAMARGO et al. (2022), from this point it can be easily distinguished from the other species by presenting the hypandrium with a straight margin, without projection ( Fig. 15 View Figs 12–20 ), and its conspicuous tongue-shaped projection in this species is found on the sternite 8 ( Figs 12, 17 View Figs 12–20 ) and not on the hypandrium as in other species of the genus.
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
INPA |
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.