Atopolinus tangi, Bordoni, 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.10273196 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E6F2622A-86E4-44BE-90E2-B9C542B9DE14 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E01A7624-E838-FFB6-6E9D-5F9BBA27FD46 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Atopolinus tangi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Atopolinus tangi View in CoL nov.sp.
M a t e r i a l s t u d i e d: Holotype: Xizang A. R. (Tibet), Pailong, Bomi coun., 2200 m, L. Tang 4.VIII.2005 ( SNUC); paratype: same data, 4.VIII.2005, 1; Xizang A. R., Nielamu coun., Zhangmu town , 2200 m, Jian-Qing Zhu 17.VII.2010, 1 (without head and damaged) (cB).
D e s c r i p t i o n: Length of body about 5,8 mm; from anterior margin of head to posterior margin of elytra: 3,3 mm. Winged. Very similar to A. xizang nov.sp. from which is hardly distinguishable on the basis of external characters. Body smaller, yellowish colouration less evident, smaller head, less oblique anterior angles of pronotum, legs less diaphanous.
Posterior margin of 6° visible abdominal tergite protruding, with two lateral, short lobules ( Fig. 112 View Figs 108-115 ); posterior margin of 6° visible abdominal sternite largely rounded ( Fig. 113 View Figs 108-115 ). Tergite and sternite of the male genital segment as in Figs 114-115 View Figs 108-115 . Aedeagus ( Fig. View Figs 116-120
116) 1,48 mm long, with long, asymmertical pseudoparameres; inner sac with a long distal spine and some median spines and big scales.
E t y m o l o g y: Patronymic. Dedicated to Liang Tang, friend and colleague, which gave me in study the material object of this contribution.
G e o g r a p h i c a l d i s t r i b u t i o n: The species is known only from the type localities, in Tibet.
N o t e: I propose the figure of the aedeaagus of the holotype and paratype ( Figs 116- 117 View Figs 116-120 ). They might seem belonging to two different species. In fact, the conformation and arrangement of the spines of the inner sac can vary from one specimen to another, being a mobile structure, stiffened in that position at the time of death. The identification must also take account of the other sexual characters: 6° visible abdominal tergite and sternite, male genital segment, size of the aedeagus, shape of the pseudoparameres.
For some characters of the aedeagus, this species is closely related to A. subnigroaeneus COIFFAIT 1982 from Nepal and W Bengala ( BORDONI 2002).
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.