Hoplocheylus sogdianicus Barilo and Sharipov, 1987
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3957.3.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FCD0E614-092D-4388-84E6-F3214F062158 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6110367 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E05E8790-EE03-E849-FF6A-4480FA468FC7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hoplocheylus sogdianicus Barilo and Sharipov, 1987 |
status |
|
Hoplocheylus sogdianicus Barilo and Sharipov, 1987
( Figs. 17–19 View FIGURE 17 View FIGURE 18 View FIGURE 19 , 20 View FIGURE 20 B–D)
Hoplocheylus sogdianicus Barilo and Sharipov, 1987: 1892 , fig. 1–4.
Redescription. FEMALE ( Figs. 17–19 View FIGURE 17 View FIGURE 18 View FIGURE 19 , 20 View FIGURE 20 B–D). Length of idiosoma 385, length of body including gnathosoma 440, width 140. Gnathosoma similar with that of H. magnificus sp. nov., but eupathidion ul” extremely small, difficult to discern. Lengths of gnathosomal setae: cha 15, chb 8, m 22, n 30, or 3. Length of palps 55. Idiosomal dorsum ( Fig. 17 View FIGURE 17 A) similar with that of H. magnificus sp. nov., but all hysterosomal setae smooth and pointed, posterior part of prodorsal shield with delicate striation ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20 C). Lengths of dorsal setae: v 1 38, v 2 16, sc 1 21, sc 2 46, c 1 28, c 2 50, d 27, e 27, f 41, h 1 48, h 2 44. Idiosomal venter ( Figs. 17 View FIGURE 17 B) similar with that of H. magnificus sp. nov., but midsternal plate between coxal fields II and III almost quadrangular. Lengths of ventral setae: 1 a 13, 1 b 12, 1 c 25, 1 d 12, 2 a 16, 2 b 25, 2 c 18, 3 a 17, 3 b 20, 3 c 21, 4 a 14, 4 b 10, 4 c 11, ag 1 14, ag 2 16, ag 3 18, g 1 11, g 2 10, g 3 10, g 4 11, ps 1 40, ps 2 36, ps 3 24. Legs ( Figs. 18 View FIGURE 18 , 19 View FIGURE 19 , 20 View FIGURE 20 B, D). Lengths of legs: I 120, II 83, III 92, IV 115. Leg setation as in H. magnificus sp. nov. Empodia on tarsi II–IV with unusual undulate anterior margin ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20 D). Setae p’ on tarsi II–IV not bifurcate. Leg I ( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 A) Setae v’ of trochanter, femur, genu and tibia blunt-ended. Setae v’ of femur and tibia distinctly barbed. Solenidion ω 2 baculiform, distinctly longer than other solenidia on leg I. Solenidion ω 1 thumb-like, reaching slightly beyond tip of tarsus. Solenidion φ 1 clavate, φ 2 finger-shaped. Lengths of solenidia: ω 1 9, ω 2 12, φ 1 8, φ 2 7. Leg II ( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 B). Setae v’ of trochanter and l’ of femur blunt-ended. Setae l’ of femur barbed. Solenidion φ well-developed, clavate ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20 B). Lengths of solenidia: ω 10, φ 4. Leg III ( Figs. 19 View FIGURE 19 A, 20D). All setae of leg III smooth and pointed, except blunt-ended p’. Solenidion φ 4 long. All setae of leg III smooth and pointed, except blunt-ended p’. Leg IV as in Fig. 19 View FIGURE 19 B.
MALE and IMMATURES unknown.
Material examined. Female holotype, slide 1540, UZBEKISTAN, dry loess in layer of 0–5 cm, East of Samarkand, 0 2 May 1982, coll. S.A. Sharipov.
Type deposition. Holotype currently deposited in the mite collection of the Tyumen State University Museum of Zoology, Tyumen, Russia.
Remarks. In the original description of H. sogdianicus authors mentioned absence of setae on trochanter I and solenidion on tibia II. Our study of the holotype revealed these structures present and well-developed ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20 B).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hoplocheylus sogdianicus Barilo and Sharipov, 1987
Khaustov, Alexander A. 2015 |
Hoplocheylus sogdianicus
Barilo 1987: 1892 |