Neoperla sambarua, Zwick & Zwick, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5316.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BC922E16-2614-4F3D-AD82-87A845DE7E2B |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E12C876C-4A18-FFF7-FF4F-FBFEFD8C0A98 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Neoperla sambarua |
status |
sp. nov. |
51. Neoperla sambarua n. sp.
( Figs. 285–288 View FIGURES 278–288 , 292–293 View FIGURES 289–293 )
Types and additional material taken with them: United Republic of Tanzania: Tanga region W. Usambara Mts., Mazumbai, ZMB’s Tanzania Exp, (after Andersen & Johansen 1992): Kaputu stream on Kwagoroto Hill, from 1770m down to 1400m (see Notes under N. usambara !): Site A: holotype ♁, 1♀, 4.– 9.11.1990; 1♀, 4.– 13.12.1990; 2♁ paratypes, 5♀, 9.– 13.1.1991; 2♁ paratypes, 2♀, 4.– 12.2.1991. 2♁, 3♀ paratypes, 1♀: Site below/beyond waterfall, 6.– 12.11.1990. Sites H, M, N, O: 1♀ paratype, 1♁, 7♀, November 1990. 1♀ paratype, Dar es Salaam [-6.8393, 39.3103; red ink] \ det. P. Zwick 1980 Neoperla spec . 37 [handwritten on photoprint]. In coll. Klapálek, NMCZ, under a N. sjostedti -label; pinned slide with genitalia & eggs. A slide with a single egg in SMNS.
Additional material studied: 1♀: Tanganyika Terr.: Bunduki [-7.0377, 37.6341], Uluguru Mts., [illegible] Mgeta, 1300m, 30.4.– 11.5.1957, Leleup & Basilewsky ( MRAC) GoogleMaps .
Holotype in ZMBN, paratypes and additional material in ZMBN, SMNS, and as indicated.
Habitus. Same as N. usambara n. sp. WL of males 11.7–12.8mm, of females 13.2–14.7mm.
Male ( Figs. 285–288 View FIGURES 278–288 ). T7 with a slender triangular process projecting far over T8 ( Figs. 285–286 View FIGURES 278–288 ). A weakly sclerotised Y-shaped sclerite on T8 is raised like a cushion, with some SB near midlength, caudally bare. T9 is unmodified, HT10 is straight, slender and longer than in A. usambara n. sp., the mediobasal callus is rounded, tongue-shaped.
The penis ( Figs. 287–288 View FIGURES 278–288 ) is a tube with slightly flattened and widened, sub-parallel distal portion. The wide section has spinose projections at base and tip. The sausage-like base of the endophallus is about half as wide as the penis tube, distally the endophallus is long and winding. The delicate needle-like spines were observed by transparency and are hardly as large as the external spines on the penis apex. The recurrent tube is thin, details were not recognised, its length is as in N. usambara n. sp..
Female ( Fig. 292 View FIGURES 289–293 ). S8 is slightly sclerotised, with an indistinct transverse pale zone near midlength. The caudal part of segment and a terminal lappet are most strongly pigmented. The caudal sternite edge is sometimes sinuous because the median lappet is flanked by shallow notches. The inner genitalia are same as in N. usambara n. sp..
Egg ( Fig. 293 View FIGURES 289–293 ). Size 381*276µm, balloon-shaped, the smooth surface is finely punctate, there are no striae. Unmodified micropyles stand in a loose ring at approximately 70% egg length. Operculum broadly rounded, the contracted collar projects, it has no cells. The anchor cavity is shallow, the anchor is mushroom-shaped.
DNA. No data.
Notes. The female from Daressalam was not mentioned in any of Klapálek’s papers but stood in his collection as the doubtful N. sjostedti . However, that species is very different from N. sambarua n. sp.. Neoperla sambarua n. sp. and N. usambara n. sp. are very similar in many respects and probably closely related, despite having different eggs.
Etymology. An anagram of Usambara, a noun in apposition, referring to the species’ range.
IV.4 The Neoperla orthonema -complex (= clade H)
The N. orthonema -complex is proposed for three West African species whose ovoid eggs at first glance seem to have a mushroom-shaped anchor. However, the delicate cap rests on several filaments which rise directly from the anchor cavity and form a curled bundle under the cap. When the anchor attaches to some substrate the filaments stretch out and turn into long threads, the cap is then no longer visible ( Fig. 302 View FIGURES 294–304 ).
Egg striae differ between the species, those of N. filamentosa n. sp. are levogyrous and resemble the N. sjostedti - and N. arambourgana complex with extremely narrow sulci with a row of micropunctures on each side ( Fig. 307 View FIGURES 305–308 ). In N. orthonema n. sp. and N. spironema n. sp. eggs have no typical sulci but two kinds of raised ridges, with the micropyles on top of the lower ridges ( Fig. 312 View FIGURES 309–312 ). Both of these characters are unique in Neoperla .
Female S8 have a large brown spot enclosing a pale anchor pattern (e.g., Fig. 301 View FIGURES 294–304 ). The slightly sclerotised caudal segment edge has a shallow bare notch ( Fig. 305 View FIGURES 305–308 ). The vagina has spines next to the attachment of the SSt which forms 2–3 rings with a dense coat of triangular scales, and the floor of the vagina is roughened by microscopic spinules. We cannot distinguish females without eggs, the eggs differ between species. The>20 to approximately 30 striae are straight in N. orthonema n. sp. but are levogyrous spirals in N. filamentosa n. sp. and N. spironema n. sp..
DNA ( Figs 491–492 View FIGURE 491 View FIGURE 492 , 496 View FIGURE 496 ). The N. orthonema -complex (= clade H) is maximally supported and genetically very distinct as indicated by the length of its branch. It is very strongly supported (92.3/100/100) as sister to N. benti n. sp., and together they are strongly supported (65.7/100/90) as sister to the extensive N. spio -complex (~ clade G). The morphology-based concept of the N. orthonema -complex (= clade H) renders the extensive N. burgeoni - complex (~ clade G) paraphyletic but including N. benti sp. n. in the N. orthonema -complex would result in two reciprocally monophyletic complexes.
Notes. The only known male in the N. orthonema -complex fits perfectly in the N. spio -group and is easily identified. In contrast, females had to be included in several keys and can only be identified by details of egg structure which are difficult to see.
SMNS |
Staatliches Museum fuer Naturkund Stuttgart |
MRAC |
Musée Royal de l’Afrique Centrale |
ZMBN |
Museum of Zoology at the University of Bergen, Invertebrate Collection |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |