Zethus (Zethus) angulatus Nguyen & Carpenter, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5339.6.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9D2B1934-C174-403B-8F55-33F16BDDEAB0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8317106 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E155647A-0A31-FA1C-6687-FA7DFC5BFBAE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Zethus (Zethus) angulatus Nguyen & Carpenter, 2016 |
status |
|
Zethus (Zethus) angulatus Nguyen & Carpenter, 2016
Zethus angulatus Nguyen and Carpenter, 2016: 27–28 View Cited Treatment , 31(key), figs. 13-18, ♁, ♀ —“ Vietnam, Bac Vang ranger station, Na Hang natural reserve, Na Hang GoogleMaps , Tuyen Quang, 22°20’52.6”N, 105°25’49”E, ca. 120 m ” (holotype, ♁, IEBR).
Reports from Hong Kong: Barthélémy, 2012: 14–15, figs 60–63, (as Zethus sp. ); Li et al., 2019: 162, figs 127– 129, (as Z. dolosus View in CoL , misidentification).
Material examined. CHINA — Hong Kong • 2♁; Pak Sha O; 22°26'59"N, 114°19'04"E, alt. 70 m; C. Barthélémy leg.; reared; 16 Apr. 2016 ( CBC) GoogleMaps • 3♁; ditto; 17 Apr. 2016 ( CBC) GoogleMaps • 1♁; ditto; 23 Apr. 2016 ( CBC) GoogleMaps • 1♀; ditto; 24 Apr. 2016 ( CBC) GoogleMaps • 1♀; Hok Tau ; 22°29'25.31"N, 114°11'0.14" E; W.-C. Yeh leg.; hand net; 06 Jun. 2006; ( FACT) GoogleMaps .
Diagnostic description. Female ( Figs 3, 4 View FIGURES 1–6 , 7–11 View FIGURES 7–11 ). Body black with yellow spots on dorso-inner margin of antennal socket and apical margin of T1; tegula dark reddish brown. Body surface generally smooth and shining, dull on propodeum, sparsely punctate throughout, only densely and coarsely punctate on head ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 7–11 ), dorsal side of pronotum and T1, and transversely costate on lateral side of pronotum and posterior depression of propodeum; lateral side of propodeum foveate on upper half and coriaceous on lower half ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 7–11 ). Clypeus apically truncate with two small and obtuse teeth, space between the teeth depressed with a middle ridge either distinct or obscure. Mandible with three closely set teeth on inner margin, middle tooth adjoining basal tooth; inter-antennal area with a smooth and Y-shape ridge ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 7–11 ). Tegula oval, posterior lobe triangular and straight ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 7–11 ), apex obtuse and reaching well beyond parategula (as in Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Propodeum with lateral carina weak, submedian carina distinct on basal half of propodeum and bf triangular ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 7–11 ). Metasoma with Sg1 three times as long as wide ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–6 ), slightly shorter than Sg2; T2 weakly depressed before apical margin with short apical lamella obliquely erect, S2 weakly angulate in profile, apical lamella shorter than T2; T3 depressed medially, with apical lamella flat, smooth and long, occupying apical 1/3 of T3; S3 with short and narrow apical lamella only presenting medially on apical margin as an indistinct and smooth flange.
Male ( Figs 1, 2, 5, 6 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Differing from female mainly in the following: Clypeus rectangularly notched apically with two large and obtuse teeth ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–6 ); mandible with three well-separated teeth on inner margin, basal tooth merged with basal angle and forming a rectangular plate, middle tooth separated from basal tooth by a broad notch. F11 slightly curved ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1–6 ) and bullet-shaped in ventral view ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–6 ), apex rounded and reaching at the base of F 8 in appressed condition.
Genitalia ( Figs 32 View FIGURES 32–33 , 34, 36, 37 View FIGURES 34–39 ). Cuspis short and adorned with dense denticles on outer side; lbd deeply curved and saddle-shaped, adorned with many tiny sensory cones and few short hairs, ldd slender and blade-like, attenuate towards and pointed at apex ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 32–33 ). Volsellar ridges adorned with a pack of four thick setae at dorsal margin and a row of 12 setae at ventral margin ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 34–39 ). Aedeagus in lateral view with lvv erect and rectangular, basal 1/2 distinctly higher than apical 1/2 ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 34–39 ), ap robust and roundly curved at basal 1/3, pb strongly attenuate towards apex and, in ventral view, elongate and triangular, with pointed apex ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 34–39 ).
Remarks: Zethus angulatus was first recorded from China by Wang et al. (2019) in Guangxi and Guangdong; hence, its existence in Hong Kong is not exceptional. Li et al. (2019) misidentified this species as Z. dolosus and mentioned it was common in Hong Kong. The nesting habit has been described in detail by Barthélémy (2012). This species is easily distinguished from Z. dolosus by many distinct morphological features, including the shorter and more swollen petiole, more smoothly curved profile of S2 and unmarked clypeus in male. The configuration of male genitalia is similar to that of trimaculatus -group shown by Yeh & Lu (2017).
Distribution: Vietnam, China (Guangxi, Guangdong and Hong Kong).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Zethus (Zethus) angulatus Nguyen & Carpenter, 2016
Yeh, Wen-Chi & Barthélémy, Christophe 2023 |