Milnesium Doyère, 1840

Rocha, Alejandra M., González-Reyes, Andrea X., Ostertag, Belén & Lisi, Oscar, 2022, The genus Milnesium (Eutardigrada, Apochela, Milnesiidae) in Argentina: description of three new species and key to the species of South America, European Journal of Taxonomy 822 (1), pp. 1-54 : 47-48

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.822.1807

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:522FD009-B4C9-4A80-871E-883E2EBE09C8

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6620673

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E27887D6-CA4D-FFD1-FF25-FC2AFB48FE03

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Milnesium Doyère, 1840
status

 

Dichotomous key of the species of Milnesium Doyère, 1840 View in CoL from South America

1. Dorsal cuticle smooth ....................................................................................................................... 2

– Dorsal cuticle ornamented (pseudopores-reticulum-dimples) .......................................................... 5

2. Claw configuration [2-2]-[2-2] .......................................................... M. kogui Londoño et al., 2015 View in CoL

– Claw configuration [3-3]-[3-3] ......................................................................................................... 3

3. BT funnel-shaped in adults (posterior/anterior width ratio lower than 65%) ..................................... .............................................. M. eurystomum Maucci, 1991 View in CoL (amended by Michalczyk et al. 2012b; amended by Morek et al. 2020a)

– BT about cylindrical in adults (posterior/anterior width ratio higher than 75%) ............................. 4

4. Pt of BT standard width lower than 52 in adults .................. M. brachyungue Binda & Pilato, 1990 View in CoL

– Pt of BT standard width higher than 52 in adults .............................................. M. quiranae View in CoL sp. nov.

5. Claw configuration [3-3]-[3-3] ......................................................................................................... 6

– Claw configuration different ............................................................................................................. 7

6. Nine rows of pseudoplates, pt of SS [63.8–66.7]; pt of BT standard width [58.1–65.6] ................... ..................................................................................................... M. beatae Roszkowska et al., 2015 View in CoL

– Without pseudoplates, pt of SS [70.0–73.7], pt of BT standard width [24.2–32.3] ........................... ............................................................................................ M. argentinum Roszkowska et al., 2015 View in CoL

7. Claw configuration [2-2]-[2-2] .............................................. M. katarzynae Kaczmarek et al., 2004 View in CoL

– Claw configuration different ............................................................................................................. 8

8. Claw configuration [2-3]-[2-2], pt of BT standard width [46.1–56.9], with 9 rows of pseudoplates ... ................................................................................................................................... M. irenae View in CoL sp. nov.

– Claw configuration [2-3]-[3-2] .............................................................................................................9

9. Cuticular dimples arranged in 10 bands, small tubercles around all claw bases, pt of BT standard width [55.2–64.0], young specimens with claw configuration [2-2]-[2-2] .... M. pelufforum View in CoL sp. nov.

– Cuticular dimples present not forming bands, pt of BT standard width [33.0–38.0], no tubercles around claw bases ..................................................... M. krzysztofi Kaczmarek & Michalczyk, 2007

Abbreviations: BT = buccal tube; SS = stylet support insertion point on the buccal tube.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF