Cladiscus terminalis Schenkling, 1912
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37520/aemnp.2020.031 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CC5352E8-213D-40E0-B340-AFB35A17665D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4551171 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E30F87CA-A74F-9258-FC6B-7C351DCC14F6 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Cladiscus terminalis Schenkling, 1912 |
status |
|
Cladiscus terminalis Schenkling, 1912
( Figs 4 View Figs 1–13 , 19, 20 View Figs 14–26 , 30, 37, 71–82, 126)
Cladiscus terminalis Schenkling, 1912: 322 [original description]. CORΡORΑΑL +| VΑΝ DΕR WΙΕL (1949): 195 [key to species]; CORΡORΑΑL (1950): 23 [listed].
Type locality. Taiwan, Taihorinsho (Y Talin, Chiayi County).
Type material. HOLOΤYΡΕ: 1 ♁, ‘Taihorinsho | Formosa | H Sauter’, ‘7. X’, ‘Holotypus’, ‘♂’, ‘DEI Coleoptera | L 200094’ ( SDEI). I examined the holotype based on the photos available in Integrated Insect Types Database of Taiwanese species at http://twinsecttype.nmns.edu.tw/species/ orig/?id Y 9CE4F73E4A51DA32414C50E82EFFDFAF
Additional specimens examined. TAIWAN: TΑIΡEI COUΝτ Y: Mt. Sangmingshan, 24.viii.1966, 1 ♁, H. Kamiya leg. ( EUMJ). PIΝGτUΝG COUΝτ Y: Chiupeng, Manchou Township, 16.x.2016, 1 ♁, K. Takahashi leg. ( KSCJ); Mt. Dahanshan, Chunri Township, 13.vi.2015, 1 ♁, Sinyan Shih leg. ( SSCT). NΑΝτOU COUΝτ Y: Musha, Renai Township, alt. 1,700 m, 24–28.viii.2016, 1 ♀, M. Tanaka leg. ( MTCJ).
Differential diagnosis. This species is similar to C. liaoi sp. nov., but distinguished by the following characters: EyD/ EyW 0.68 in male, 1.53 in female; PWA/PWB 1.12–1.24; female antennae ( Fig. 20 View Figs 14–26 ) relatively shorter than male ( Fig. 19 View Figs 14–26 ); apex of elytra round, partly black.
Supplementary description. Male ( Fig. 4 View Figs 1–13 ). Head, pronotum, elytra except for apex yellowish brown; antennae, elytra at apex., and legs brownish black.
Antennae ( Fig. 19 View Figs 14–26 ) longer than total length of head and pronotum combined, antennomeres III to X acutely serrate; XI fusiform, twice as long as X.
Pronotum smooth at apex; tubercles developed in middle; postcoxal projections ( Fig. 37 View Figs 27–39 ) short; prosternal process not extending contact point of postcoxal projections. Elytra with rows of deep, large, asetigerous punctures before apex; apical margins not indented. Mesoventrite evenly covered with setigerous punctures. Metaventral anterior process shorter and wider than mesoventral posterior process. Metendosternite ( Fig. 71 View Figs 71–82 ) without furcal laminae; process extending slightly anteriorly; furcal arms almost straight, extending anterolaterally.
Protibiae ( Fig. 30 View Figs 27–39 ) gently widening to apex., weakly curved. Tibial spur formula 0–0–0.
Apical margin of abdominal ventrite V broadly and slightly emarginated. Apical margin of pygidium ( Fig. 72 View Figs 71–82 ) almost straight; struts short. Apical margin of ventrite VI ( Fig. 73 View Figs 71–82 ) almost straight. Spicular fork ( Fig. 74 View Figs 71–82 ) with short intraspicular plate, which is 1/4 of spicular fork.
CM ( Figs 77–79 View Figs 71–82 ) with fine spines, about 1/2 as long as tegmen. Tegmen shorter than phallus; phallobase incised dorsally; phallobasic struts reaching phallobasic apodeme, which is 3/4 as long as tegmen. Phallus flattened, divaricated in apical 1/3, rounded at apex.
Female. Similar to male, but EyD/EyW 1.53; antennae ( Fig. 20 View Figs 14–26 ) weakly serrate; central portion of metaventrite with pair of bundles of elongate setae-like trichobothria; apical margin of ventrite V truncated broadly and deeply in middle.
Apical margin of pygidium ( Fig. 75 View Figs 71–82 ) almost straight; struts short. Apical margin of ventrite VI ( Fig. 76 View Figs 71–82 ) incised in middle; apodeme 2/3 as long as total length.
Spermatheca weakly sclerotized; Sc lacking. CPr ( Figs 80–82 View Figs 71–82 ) distally trifurcate; central process large; dorsolateral and ventrolateral processes relatively short.
Measurements and ratios. Male (n Y 2): BL: 8.67–9.06 mm; PL: 1.88–2.13 mm; PWA: 1.18–1.30 mm; PWM: 0.70–0.75 mm; PWB: 1.05 mm; EL: 6.55–7.18 mm; EW: 1.50–1.68 mm; EyD: 0.38–0.43 mm; EyW: 0.55–0.63 mm; EL/PL: 3.08–3.83; EW/PWA: 1.15–1.43; EW/PWM: 2.00–2.39; EW/PWB: 1.43–1.60; PWA/PWB: 1.12–1.24; PWA/PWM: 1.68–1.73; PWB/PWM: 1.40–1.50; EyD/ EyW: 0.68. Female (n Y 1): BL: 9.46 mm; PL: 2.10 mm; PWA: 1.23 mm; PWM: 0.70 mm; PWB: 1.00 mm; EL: 7.36 mm; EW: 1.48 mm; EyD: 0.65 mm; EyW: 0.43 mm; EL/PL: 3.51; EW/PWA: 1.20; EW/PWM: 2.11; EW/PWB: 1.48; PWA/PWB: 1.23; PWA/PWM: 1.75; PWB/PWM: 1.43; EyD/EyW: 1.53.
Distribution ( Fig. 126 View Fig 126 ). Taiwan.
EUMJ |
Ehime University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cladiscus terminalis Schenkling, 1912
Murakami, Hiroyuki 2020 |
Cladiscus terminalis
SCHENKLING S. 1912: 322 |