Pancheria sebertii Guillaumin
publication ID |
1639-4798 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:295C9B6D-61EC-4000-A704-7823D342771A |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E41087E4-FFF1-FFA2-CDF2-FB31FBA3DD0D |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Pancheria sebertii Guillaumin |
status |
|
37. Pancheria sebertii Guillaumin View in CoL
Bulletin du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle 27: 122 (1921), as “ Seberti ”. — Replaced name: Pancheria ternata auctt., sensu Pancher & Sebert, Notice sur les bois de la Nouvelle Calédonie: 206 (1874a) [and Revue maritime et coloniale 40: 592 (1874b [February]), n.v.], non Brongn. & Gris (1862), fide Guillaumin (1921). Specimens cited (1874a: 274, in table): Fournier & Sebert (sic) 6, Petit 6. — Lectotype (here designated): s.loc., nom. vern. “Hiramia” or “Iramia”, s.dat., old fr., Sebert & Fournier 6 ( P! P00143081 ). — Lectoparatype: Petit 6 ( P! P00602441 , st.) is conspecific.
REMARKS
Sebert was the principal author of “ Notice sur les bois de la Nouvelle Calédonie ” with the descriptive part written “en commun avec M. Pancher”. Authorship for names published in this book are usually, though not always, ascribed to Pancher & Sebert (http:// www.ipni.org, author search, 2 February 2007). These authors identified Fournier & Sebert (sic) 6 and Petit 6 as P. ternata Brongn. & Gris and gave a brief description of the plant, its wood and its uses .
Guillaumin (1921) considered that Pancher & Sebert’s plant was not identical to Pancheria ternata and so he named it as a new species, P. sebertii . He provided no description himself but his name is validated by reference to Pancher & Sebert’s publication. Although Pancher & Sebert did not intend to describe a new plant, their publication complies with Art. 32-45 of the Code and the specimens they cited are the syntypes of Guillaumin’s name. Sheets of these collections at P each have a label in Guillaumin’s hand indicating “ Pancheria seberti = Pancheria ternata Panch. et Seb. non Brongn. & Gris” and “type”. The specimen labelled “ Seb. et Fourn. 6 ” is chosen as the lectotype because it is fertile while Petit 6 is sterile. A sterile specimen at BM labelled “No. 6, Pancheria ternata ” could be an isolectotype, a lectoparatype, or neither.
Guillaumin (1921) mentioned two other collections as belonging to Pancheria sebertii , though they are not syntypes, Franc 1843 from Prony and Franc 226. He stated that the latter had been identified by Schlechter as P. ternata , but this appears to be an error as it is Franc 227 at P that was determined by Schlechter as P. ternata and redetermined by Guillaumin as P. sebertii .
Although the types of Pancheria sebertii and P.ternata are rather different from one another,both appear to belong to a complex species for which the oldest available name is P.ternata Brongn. &Gris. Variation in this complex will be discussed elsewhere.
P |
Museum National d' Histoire Naturelle, Paris (MNHN) - Vascular Plants |
M |
Botanische Staatssammlung München |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.