Ophiomyia kireshiensis Guglya, 2020

Guglya, Yu., 2020, Mining Flies Of The Subfamily Agromyzinae (Diptera, Agromyzidae) Of Ukrainian Transcarpathia, With The Description Of Three New Species, Zoodiversity 54 (6), pp. 453-478 : 461-463

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.15407/zoo2020.06.453

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0E0F9DCA-BA5D-4C39-82C2-43DA35108D32

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6462183

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/52E95228-479C-42B3-9548-2B2FBFE0958D

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:52E95228-479C-42B3-9548-2B2FBFE0958D

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Ophiomyia kireshiensis Guglya
status

sp. nov.

Ophiomyia kireshiensis Guglya View in CoL , sp. n. ( figs 10–20 View Figs 10–17 View Figs 18–22 , 40 View Figs 40, 41 )

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:52E95228-479C-42B3-9548-2B2FBFE0958D

M a t e r i a l e x a m i n e d. Type. Holotype ♂, “ Ukraine, Transcarpathia, / near Khust, Kireshi / 48°11' N 23°21' E / 25.07.2017 / Guglya J. leg.”,“12.30, “Valley of / Narcissi” / low motley grass on the meadow ”. GoogleMaps

Paratypes: 1 ♂, 1 ♀, “ Ukraine, Transcarpathia, / near Khust, Kireshi / 48°11' N 23°21' E / 25.07.2017 / Guglya J. leg.”,“12.30, “ Valley of / Narcissi ” / low motley grass on the meadow”; GoogleMaps 2 ♂, “ Transcarpathia, near Luh / 800 m a. s. l., 14.00 / 10.05.2018, clearing / 47°56' N 24°07' E, / Guglya Yu. leg.”; GoogleMaps 1 ♂, “ Ukraine, Transcarpathia / 1 km SE Rakhiv Centre / 48°02' N 24°13' E / 22.07.2017 / Guglya Yu. leg.”, 11.30, 650 m a. s. l. / ruderal motley grass / along the road near / Silskyi Potik”, grey label “VOUCHER / Sequenced / specimen / N J0095” GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, “ Ukraine, Transcarpathia / 2 km SW Rakhiv Centre / Shoimul Mt., 580 m a. s. l. / 15.06.2018, meadow on / a slope Guglya Yu.”, grey label “VOUCHER / Sequenced / specimen / N J0271”; 1 ♂, “ Ukraine, Vinnytsa / Region , 12.30, near / Chechelnyk , Vyshenka , / 48°10'45" N 29°20'00" E / 01.07.2019 Guglya Yu.” GoogleMaps .

Description. Head ( figs 10, 11 View Figs 10–17 , 18, 19 View Figs 18–22 ). Orbit not projected above eye in profile, narrow, matt, without clear contour (anterior view); 2 orb s, 2 fr s; frorb sta sparse, reclinate; frons, orbits and ocellar triangle uniformly matt; frons with distinct dorsocentral suture; lunule rounded, with wide furrow from ptilinal fissure to facial carina; facial carina strongly projected above level of lunule, oval, in female 1.5× as wide as in male; ocellar triangle reaching to the level of upper fr s; maximum height of eye 7.5× maximum height of gena; vibrissal fasciculus long, gradually curved dorsally in male, long vibrissa presents in female.

W i n g ( fig.17 View Figs 10–17 ). Costa reaching M 1;last section of CuA 1 slightly shorter than penultimate; calypter grey, fringe and margin black. Length of wing 2.1 mm.

Mesonotum black, shining, with golden undertone; scutulum the same, but undertone stronger (dorsal view); 2 dc; acr in 8–9 rows at level of 2 nd dc; halter and legs black.

M a l e g e n i t a l i a ( figs12–16 View Figs 10–17 ).Phallus typical for the genus, 0.35mm length.Distiphallus massive orbed anteriorly and more narrow triangular posteriorly (ventral view), distiphallus posteriorly distinctly longer than mesophallus (lateral view). Mesophallus slightly curved basally and rather long, 0.7× as long as distiphallus. Basiphallus with narrow sclerites (arms), 1.4× as long as distiphallus (ventral view) ( figs 12, 13 View Figs 10–17 ). Ejaculatory apodeme moderately narrow ( fig. 16 View Figs 10–17 ). Hypandrium elongated with narrow broadened arms and hypandrial apodeme abducted and slightly curved laterally as in figs 14, 15. View Figs 10–17

F e m a l e t e r m i n a l i a ( fig. 20 View Figs 18–22 ). Both spermatheca identical, dark brown, wider than high, its width 1.5× as maximum height; internal duct invagination scarcely visible, reaching the top of spermathecae; blade of hypogynium and proctiger with cerci of the same length; blade of hypogynium rounded apically, denticles of outer margin small, scarcely visible, directed apically, inner margin and membrane without scales.

Diagnosis. External morphology of the new species is similar to that of other Ophiomyia species with fasciculus that cannot be reliably identificated without male dissection. The male terminalia are distinct in that the shape of phallus resenbles that of O. moravica Černý, 1994 , but in O. moravica there is a distinct gap between the mesophallus and the posterior half of the distiphallus (in lateral view), and the anterior part of the distiphallus 1.5× as long as the posterior.

The new species can be integrated to the Key of Ophiomyia of Ukraine ( Guglya, 2014) as follows:

30a. Ocellar triangle large, reaching to the level of upper fr s; facial carina oval, without any invaginations or furrows ( figs 10 View Figs 10–17 , 18 View Figs 18–22 ). Distiphallus with massive orbed distal part and more narrow triangular proximal part (ventral view), that posteriorly distinctly longer that endophallus (lateral view) ( figs 12, 13 View Figs 10–17 )............ ................................................................................................................................................ O. kireshiensis sp. n.

― Ocellar triangle of medium size, reaching to the level of lower orb s; facial carina with invagination or furrow. Distiphallus of another shape .................................................................................................. 31

D i s t r i b u t i o n. Transcarpathia and Vinnytsa Region of Ukraine ( fig. 40 View Figs 40, 41 ).

E t y m o l o g y. The species is named after its type locality.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Agromyzidae

SubFamily

Agromyzinae

Genus

Ophiomyia

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF