Calliotropis eucheloides Marshall, 1979
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.923.2445 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AD68CEDD-2F2D-4010-BE7A-1B1AE9E4A0F3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10818329 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E54587AB-3849-0B04-FDB7-F8895538F83B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Calliotropis eucheloides Marshall, 1979 |
status |
|
Calliotropis eucheloides Marshall, 1979 View in CoL
Fig. 13A–C, G View Fig
Calliotropis eucheloides Marshall, 1979: 527 View in CoL , fig. 3a–c.
Type loc.: east of Chanter Islets, Raoul Island , Kermadec Islands , 366–402 m.
Calliotropis eucheloides View in CoL – Vilvens 2006: 62, figs 24–27; 2007: 46, figs 138–155, 160, 161; 2020: 39, figs 17a–o, 18a–o; 2021: 108, fig. 7j–n. — Herbert 2015: 29.
Material examined
WALTERS SHOAL – slopes • 7 empty shells; stn DW4881; 33°16′ S, 43°50′ E; depth 377–382 m; 2 May 2017; MNHN GoogleMaps • 1 living specimen; stn DW4885; 33°17′ S, 43°55′ E; depth 272–380 m; 3 May 2017; DNA tissue sample; MNHN-IM-2013-67238 GoogleMaps • 10 + empty shells; stn DW4886; 33°17′ S, 43°56′ E; depth 573–582 m; 3 May 2017; MNHN GoogleMaps • 10 + empty shells; stn DW4887; 33°17′ S, 43°57′ E; depth 599–640 m; 3 May 2017; MNHN GoogleMaps • 1 living specimen; stn DW4887; 33°17′ S, 43°57′ E; depth 599– 640 m; 3 May 2017; DNA tissue sample; MNHN-IM-2013-67239 GoogleMaps • 1 living specimen; stn DW4887; 33°17′ S, 43°57′ E; depth 599–640 m; 3 May 2017; DNA tissue sample, photographed alive; MNHN- IM-2013-67240 GoogleMaps • 1 empty shell, juvenile; stn DW4889; 33°09′ S, 43°58′ E; depth 353–465 m; 3 May 2017; MNHN GoogleMaps • 10 + specimens, some living; stn DW4890; 33°09′, 43°59′ E; depth 492–588 m; 4 May 2017; MNHN GoogleMaps • 1 empty shell; stn DW4891; 33°12′ S, 44°01′ E; depth 650–653 m; 4 May 2017; MNHN GoogleMaps • 12 specimens, some living; stn DW4892; 33°12′ S, 44°01′ E; depth 624–646 m; 4 May 2017; MNHN GoogleMaps • empty shell, juvenile; stn DW4893; 33°16′ S, 43°58′ E; depth 623–629 m; 4 May 2017; MNHN GoogleMaps • 1 empty shell; stn DW4896; 33°07′ S, 43°51′ E; depth 325–357 m; 5 May 2017; MNHN GoogleMaps • 1 empty shell, juvenile; stn DW4898; 33°09′ S, 44°01′ E; depth 652–668 m; 6 May 2017; MNHN GoogleMaps • 1 empty shell; stn CP4901; 33°09′ S, 44°01′ E; depth 647–672 m; 6 May 2017; MNHN GoogleMaps • 2 empty shells; stn CP4903; 33°11′ S, 44°01′ E; depth 620–642 m; 7 May 2017; MNHN GoogleMaps • 1 living specimen; stn DW4904; 33°11′ S, 44°01′ E; depth 652 m; 7 May 2017; DNA tissue sample; MNHN-IM-2013-67241 GoogleMaps • 1 empty shell; stn DW4904; 33°11′ S, 44°01′ E; depth 652 m; 7 May 2017; MNHN GoogleMaps .
Distribution
Widespread in the Indo-West Pacific ( Vilvens 2007, 2021). In the south-western Indian Ocean, it has been recorded from north-western and southern Madagascar ( Vilvens 2006, 2021) and the east coast of South Africa ( Herbert 2015). On Walters Shoal it is known only from the slopes at depths of 357–652 m (live-collected material 380–652 m); dredged on substrata of coarse sand.
Remarks
As currently interpreted, this species is widespread and variable ( Vilvens 2006, 2007, 2021). With records from off eastern South Africa and off western Madagascar, its occurrence on Walters Shoal is unsurprising. Vilvens (2006) noted that Madagascan shells were somewhat larger than south-western Pacific specimens and differed slightly in sculptural detail, but observed that South African specimens were more typical in size. Material from Walters Shoal appears to be intermediate (diameter up to 12.0 mm). I should also point out that whereas the columella denticle in south-western Pacific specimens is a single rounded entity (see figures in Marshall 1979; Vilvens 2007), in specimens from the south-western Indian Ocean this denticle is apically notched in mature specimens ( Fig. 13A View Fig herein; Vilvens 2006: fig. 26; Herbert 2015: fig. 5d), sometimes appearing as two separate, but basally fused denticles. Molecular sequence data will be required in order to establish whether one or more species is involved.
The external anatomy of a living specimen photographed on board ship ( Fig. 13G View Fig ) was similar to that described for Calliotropis by Hickman & McLean (1990). The head-foot is mostly whitish, but the oral area and foot sole are pale apricot. The tip of the snout is greatly expanded laterally, forming trigonal, palp-like extensions. The cephalic lappets are small, the cephalic tentacles well developed and micropapillate, and the eyes large and black on stout stalks. The neck lobes are digitate, although the right one is smooth posteriorly. There are 4–5 well-developed micropapillate epipodial tentacles on each side, with smaller intermediaries, all of which have apricot-tinged epipodial sense organs at the base. A rehydrated specimen had what appeared to be a large post-ocular peduncle behind the right eyestalk (obscured in the living specimen).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Calliotropis eucheloides Marshall, 1979
Herbert, David G. 2024 |
Calliotropis eucheloides
Herbert D. G. 2015: 29 |
Vilvens C. 2006: 62 |
Calliotropis eucheloides
Marshall B. A. 1979: 527 |