Foersterella reptans (Nees)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4137.4.8 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9935AF06-E546-4E3A-829D-DCC930B3EC2F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6057913 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E56F87C4-3E2C-FF80-FF55-0389FE1F49AD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Foersterella reptans (Nees) |
status |
|
Foersterella reptans (Nees) View in CoL
Figs 3 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 – 4 , 8, 11, 12 View FIGURES 7 – 13 , 14 View FIGURE 14
Pteromalus reptans Nees, 1834: 114 . Type material not located.
Tetracampe flavipes Förster, 1841: 34 View in CoL . Type material in NHMW, not examined. Synonymized by Bouček (1992: 32). Tetracampe galerucae Thomson, 1878: 183 . Synonymized by Bouček (1958: 69). Hyperbius flavipes (Förster) , Förster (1878: 58).
Foersterella flavipes (Förster) View in CoL , Dalla Torre (1898: 87).
Tetracampe reptans (Nees) View in CoL , Bouček & Rasplus (1991:134).
Foersterella reptans (Nees) View in CoL , Bouček (1992: 32).
Material (25♂). Czech Republic (5♂ BMNH, MZLU); England (5♂ BMNH); France (4♂ BMNH); Sweden (11♂ BMNH, MZLU).
Diagnosis. Male. Antenna ( Figs 3 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 – 4 , 8 View FIGURES 7 – 13 ): F1 and 2 each 1.4×, F3 1.2×, and F6 0.7× as long as wide; antennal clava (in widest part) 2.0× as wide as greatest width of pedicel; F1–3 and clava dark brown, F4–6 yellowish-white; face with rather dense setation, as in F. erdoesi ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 – 4 ).
Hosts. Endoparasitoid in eggs of Cassida deflorata Suffrian ( Labeyrie 1961) , C. murraea L. ( Bouček & Askew 1968), C. rubiginosa ( Bouček 1958) , and C. viridis L. ( Bouček 1958) ( Coleoptera : Chrysomelidae ). I have not seen any reared specimens of this species, and in view of the confusion with species identification, host records in literature must be regarded with caution.
Distribution. Austria, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Sweden, Yugoslavia (all seven records in Bouček 1958), France ( Labeyrie 1961), Italy ( Herting 1973), Romania ( Herting 1973), United Kingdom ( Graham, 1963). In view of the confusion with species identification, distribution records in literature must be regarded with caution.
MZLU |
Lund University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Foersterella reptans (Nees)
Hansson, Christer 2016 |
Foersterella reptans
Boucek 1992: 32 |
Foersterella flavipes (Förster)
Dalla 1898: 87 |
Tetracampe flavipes Förster, 1841 : 34
Boucek 1992: 32 |
Boucek 1958: 69 |
Thomson 1878: 183 |
Forster 1841: 34 |