Nomia (Gnathonomia) aurata Bingham, 1897
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4768.1.5 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B5409282-6539-4486-8C7A-CF38FE15C955 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3795456 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E61F577E-8808-C24A-95EE-FF65C990FBFD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Nomia (Gnathonomia) aurata Bingham, 1897 |
status |
|
Nomia (Gnathonomia) aurata Bingham, 1897
( Figs 3–4 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 )
Nomia aurata Bingham, 1897: 458 , ♂. Lectotype: ♂, Myanmar: Tenasserim, Haundraw Valley , 2.95, leg. Bingham, NHMUK,
designated by Pauly (2009: 155). Nomia nasicana Cockerell, 1911: 221 View in CoL , ♀. Holotype: ♀, India, NHMUK. Synonymy by Pauly (2009: 155). Nomia crassiuscula Friese, 1913: 87 View in CoL , ♀, ♂. Lectotype: ♀, Sri Lanka: N. Ceylon, M. Illuppala, AMNH, Synonymy by Pauly
(2009: 155). Nomia perconcinna Cockerell, 1920: 210 , ♀. Holotype: ♀, India, USNM. Synonymy by Pauly (2009: 155).
Diagnosis. Male of this species can be distinguished from other species of subgenus Gnathonomia by the following: hind femur strongly developed, swollen; hind tibia with a weakly C-shaped projection apically ( Fig. 3e View FIGURE 3 ); scutellum shiny, with sparse large punctures ( Fig. 3c View FIGURE 3 ); apical margin of T1–5 with yellowish bands, and band on T1 narrower than that on T2–5 (band on T1 absent sometimes) ( Fig. 3f View FIGURE 3 ).
Redescription. Male. BL= 9–12 mm, body blackish-brown. Head. HL: HW=0.49, head broader than long ( Fig. 3a View FIGURE 3 ); GW: EW=0.87, eye obviously broader than gena; interocellar distance nearly twice as long as ocellocular distance ( Fig. 3a View FIGURE 3 ); mandible blackish-brown, with one tooth on upper margin medially; frons with smooth frontal line medially ( Fig. 3a View FIGURE 3 ); vertex with rounded posterior margin ( Fig. 3b, 3d View FIGURE 3 ); antenna reaching apical margin of tegula; scape nearly equal F1–3 together in length; F1 slightly enlarged, nearly as long as broad, nearly 0.5 times as long as F2 ( Fig. 3a View FIGURE 3 ); F2–10 nearly equal in length, almost twice as long as broad; F11 rounded apically, nearly 2.2–2.3 times as long as broad ( Fig. 3d View FIGURE 3 ); ocelli normal, not enlarged; vertex behind lateral ocellus with shiny line. Mesosoma. Mesoscutum dull, densely and deeply punctuate ( Fig. 3d View FIGURE 3 ); scutellum shiny, broader than long, with sparse large punctures ( Fig. 3c View FIGURE 3 ); metapostnotum with broad longitudinal wrinkles; inclined part of metapostnotum widely triangular and dull ( Fig. 3c View FIGURE 3 ); fore wing with three submarginal cells, 1 st submarginal cell almost equal to 3 rd submarginal cell in length, about twice as long as 2 nd submarginal cell ( Fig. 3d View FIGURE 3 ); tegula normal, not enlarged ( Fig. 3d View FIGURE 3 ); legs reddish-brown; hind femur strongly developed, swollen ( Fig. 3e View FIGURE 3 ); hind tibia with weakly C-shaped projection apically ( Fig. 3e View FIGURE 3 ). Metasoma. Metasomal terga dull, with dense shallow minute punctures; apical margin of T1–5 with yellowish bands; band on T1 narrower than that on T2–5, sometimes disappeared ( Fig. 3f View FIGURE 3 ); upper marginal of gonostylus rounded, upper penis valve extended, as showing in Fig. 4a View FIGURE 4 (in ventral view) and Fig. 4b View FIGURE 4 (in lateral view). S5 rounded apically, with two hair brushes medially ( Fig. 4a View FIGURE 4 ); S6 deeply thickened apically ( Fig. 4b View FIGURE 4 ); S7 as showing in Fig. 4e; S View FIGURE 4 8 View FIGURE 8 as showing in Fig. 4f View FIGURE 4 . Pubescence. Clypeus, supraclypeal area and frons with fine dense yellowish hairs ( Fig. 5a View FIGURE 5 ); mesoscutum, scutellum and metanotum with sparse short hairs ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 c–d); upper lateral surface of propodeum with sparse long yellowish hairs ( Fig. 3c View FIGURE 3 ); legs with sparse hairs ( Fig. 3b, 3d, 3f View FIGURE 3 ); metasomal terga with sparse yellowish hairs ( Fig. 3c, 3d, 3f View FIGURE 3 ).
Female. Not examined in this study.
Material examined. China: Yunnan: 1 ♂, Damenglong (21°55′38″N, 101°15′29″E), 553m, 6.X.1958, leg. Zi-Zhi Chen. Cambodia: Phnom Penh: 1 ♂, Garden MT (11°31′32″N, 104°31′00″E), 11m, VIII.25.2013, leg. M. Petrtýl, MSAA. Malaysia: Penang: 1 ♂, Botanical Garden (5°26′11″N, 100°17′22″E), 62m, 26.IV.2014, MSAA. Laos: Khammouane: 1 ♂, Centr. Khannouan, Nakai (17°35′02″N, 105°10′18″E), 166m, VI.2001, leg. E. Jendek, MSAA; 1 ♂, Centr. Khannouan, Ban Khoun Ngeun (18°07’17″N, 104°29’42″E), XI.2001, leg. E. Jendek, MSAA. Thailand: Nan: 1 ♂ ,, ausserhalb dMaeCharim NP Einganges (19°10′14″N, 100°45′04″E), 51m, V.23.2012, leg. E.U. J. Hüttinger, MSAA.
Distribution. China (Yunnan); Myanmar ( Pauly 2009); Cambodia (Phnom Penh); India (Karnataka, Puducherry, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand; Pauly 2009); Laos (Khammouane); Malaysia (including Penang); Thailand (Nan, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Phetchaburi).
Floral association. Unknown.
Remarks. N. aurata is recorded from China for the first time here.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Nomia (Gnathonomia) aurata Bingham, 1897
Zhang, Dan, Niu, Ze-Qing, Orr, Michael C., Ascher, John S. & Zhu, Chao-Dong 2020 |
Nomia aurata
Bingham, C. T. 1897: 458 |