Hyposoter ruficrus ( Thomson, 1887 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5290.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FD54D381-F123-4958-A03E-6CA71E02D06A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7959399 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E62587BF-FFDE-FFBD-FF7E-4571971966F8 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hyposoter ruficrus ( Thomson, 1887 ) |
status |
|
Hyposoter ruficrus ( Thomson, 1887) View in CoL
Anislasta ruficrus Thomson, 1887 : lectotype ♀ in MZLU, designated by Aubert (1966b), examined by Horstmann.
Most red-bodied specimens with dark tegulae and red hind femora will prove to be this species. Some specimens of H. dolosus with dark tegulae are similar, but can be distinguished easily by the key characters, particularly the colour of the second tergite. Other species with red on the abdomen, dark tegulae and red hind femora have only very limited red or brown marks at the sides of some of the metasomal tergites.
The species has been reared in the UK from Pyronia tithonus (Linnaeus) and Maniola jurtina (Linnaeus) ( Nymphalidae , Satyrinae ) ( Shaw et al. 2016). We have seen specimens from the UK and Germany. The lectotype was from Sweden. It has also been reported with uncertain reliability from Norway, Finland, France, Hungary, Latvia, and Romania. We have seen specimens taken from July to September, with an even distribution over the period.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hyposoter ruficrus ( Thomson, 1887 )
Galsworthy, Anthony, Shaw, Mark R. & Haraldseide, Håkon 2023 |
Anislasta ruficrus
Thomson 1887 |
H. dolosus
Gravenhorst 1829 |