Sirthenea (Monogmus) laevicollis Horváth, 1909

Chłond, Dominik, 2018, A taxonomic revision of the genus Sirthenea (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae) of the Old World, Zootaxa 4520 (1), pp. 1-85 : 64-69

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4520.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E464CD8A-2738-40C3-B681-9FE4E618C29C

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5950700

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E64E4551-410A-FFE5-FF67-FBB1FC82FE79

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Sirthenea (Monogmus) laevicollis Horváth, 1909
status

 

Sirthenea (Monogmus) laevicollis Horváth, 1909 View in CoL

( Figs. 131–143 View FIGURE 131 View FIGURE 132 View FIGURES 133–143 , 158–163 View FIGURES 156–158 View FIGURES 159–163 , 181 View FIGURES 169–182 , 186 View FIGURES 183–187 , 209, 210 View FIGURES 209–210 , Map 13)

Sirthenea (Monogmus) laevicollis Horváth, 1909: 366 View in CoL . Syntype (s) (2 ♂♂): N.S. Wales: Australia; HNHM.

Type material examined: Syntype, Ƌ: Australia / N.S. Wales [printed]; Sirthenea / laevicollis Horv [handwritten]; typus [printed on label with red frame] (HNHM). Syntype, Ƌ: label with glued tarsus; Australia / N.S. Wales [printed]; typus [printed on label with red frame]; vial with dissected genitalia; Type Ƌ / Sirthenea / laevicollis Horváth / dissected & drawn [handwritten] / det. M.B.Malipatil 1984 [printed, date partially handwritten] (HNHM).

Other material examined: Ƌ: N.S. Wales [printed] (NHRS). ♀: Mt.Tam-M / bourine [printed]; Queensl. / Mjöberg [printed]; Swedish Museum / of Natural History / Stockholm / NHRS [printed] (NHRS). Brachypterous ♀: Mapletón / 8/II/12 (handwritten); L6 [handwritten]; Queensland. / H. Hacker. / B.M. 1924-455 [printed] (NHMUK). Brachypterous ♀: Dr. Müller / N. Holl. / 1861 [handwritten]; Coll. Nat.-Mus. Wien [printed on yellow label]; Sirthenea / spp. [handwritten]; Sirthenea / laevicollis Horváth [handwritten] / Det. L. Willemse 1982 [printed, date partially handwritten] (NHMW). Brachypterous ♀: Dr. Müller / N. Holl. / 1861 [handwritten]; Coll. Nat.-Mus. Wien [printed on yellow label]; Sirthenea / laevicollis Horváth [handwritten] / Det. L. Willemse 1982 [printed, date partially handwritten] (NHMW).

Diagnosis. This species can be very easily recognized among other congeners by presence of fossula spongiosa on middle tibia and bulbous structure on valvula II of females terminalia. This species is similar to S. obscura but it can be easily distinguished from it by smaller body size, eyes narrower than synthlipsis, S-shaped posterior margin of an eye, deep apodeme deression of the head, reduced sulci, sculptured posterior pronotal lobe, spiracles III–IV placed near of ventral connexival suture ( Fig. 186 View FIGURES 183–187 ) and brown body with yellowish legs.

Redescription: Color: Body pale brown with yellow antenna, labium, legs and connexiva ( Figs. 131 View FIGURE 131 , 132 View FIGURE 132 , 209, 210 View FIGURES 209–210 ). Apical half of anteocular part of head brighter.

MAP 13. Distribution of Sirthenea laevicollis Horváth, 1909 (red circles) and Sirthenea obscura ( Stål, 1866) (red squares).

Structure: Body medium sized and slender (males) ( Fig. 131 View FIGURE 131 ) or large and robust (brachypterous females) ( Fig. 132 View FIGURE 132 ). Postocular part of head and pronotum shiny. Head with dense, various sized (mostly medium sized) setae and 3–4 pairs of trichobothrial setae. Anteocular part of head long, 3.63–3.66 times as long as postocular part. Dorsal surface of antennifers corrugated. Eyes and ocelli medium-sized. Eyes narrower than synthlipsis with Sshaped posterior margin. Ocelli placed on small tubercles. Scape long, distinctly reaching over apex of head, with various sized (short in males, short and long in females ( Figs. 131 View FIGURE 131 , 132 View FIGURE 132 , 209, 210 View FIGURES 209–210 )), semierect setae. Pedicel with dense, semierect, relatively short setae and 5, very long trichobothrial setae ( Fig. 181 View FIGURES 169–182 ). Basiflagellum thin, with various sized, erect setae. Distiflagellum thin, covered by short adherent and relatively long erect setae. First visible labial segment covered by medium sized and long setae. Second visible labial segment, enlarged basally, gradually narrowing into apex, with short setae, reaching posterior margin of head. Third visible labial segment thin and long, covered by relatively long, erect setae. Apodeme depression and transversal suture of head deep. Anterior pronotal lobe with distinct collar and barely visible sulci covered by scarce, relatively short setae and a few trichobothrial setae. Ridges of proepisternum and proepimeron not connected in entire length. Transversal suture of pronotum with irregular in shape connected with short and wide apodeme depression. Posterior pronotal lobe delicately depressed longitudinally in middle of anterior part (depression is an extension of apodeme depression on anterior pronotal lobe). Anterior part of posterior pronotal lobe, connected with transversal sulcus wrinkled longitudinally. Lateral parts of posterior pronotal lobe with delicate, transversal sculpturation. Metapleura with two complete ridges. Posterior margin of posterior pronotal lobe very delicately curved and covered by medium-sized setae. Margins of scutellum enlarged and shinning with dense, relatively long setae. Central part of scutellum granulated, apex medium sized and rounded. Femur covered by short and long erect setae. Mid tibia with thin and long fossula spongiosa occupying their apical thirds ( Figs. 160–164 View FIGURES 159–163 View FIGURES 164–168 ). Hind tibia covered by relatively long setae. Total length of first and second tarsomere of hind tarsus larger than third tarsomere. Tarsus covered by various sized setae (mostly on inner side). On all legs visible long trichobothrial setae, occure on outer side of femur and tibia. Hemelytron of females strongly reduced, not reaching to posterior margin of metathorax ( Fig. 158 View FIGURES 156–158 ). Corium and membrane shiny (in both sexes). Costal margin covered by very dense, short and curved setae. Abdomen (dictinctly enlarged in females) beneath delicately wrinkled transversally on each sterna and covered with medium sized and dense setae. Spiracles III–IV placed near of ventral connexival suture ( Fig. 186 View FIGURES 183–187 ). Distinct granulated depressions visible near connexival suture, between spiracles.

Genitalia: Male—Median process of pygophore strongly elongated, gradually narrower into aharp apex ( Fig. 136 View FIGURES 133–143 ). Both parameres large with relatively long and dense setae on outer and inner side, and several very long setae on outer side ( Figs. 137–140 View FIGURES 133–143 ). Left paramere subtringular, right paramere with enlarged and rounded apical part. Aedeagus visibly curved in dorsal view ( Fig. 143 View FIGURES 133–143 ). Pedicel relatively stout and medium sized, distinctly curved in middle ( Figs. 141, 142 View FIGURES 133–143 ). Pedicel placed assymetrically and bent laterally ( Fig. 143 View FIGURES 133–143 ). Basal plates relatively short and distinctly stout ( Figs. 141–143 View FIGURES 133–143 ). Dorsal phallothecal sclerite relatively stout and tongue-like, distinctly enlarged vertically into characteristic keel ( Fig. 143 View FIGURES 133–143 ).

Female—Valvifer I subrectangular, slightly elongated horizontally ( Fig. 135 View FIGURES 133–143 ), with few relatively long setae on outer side. Styloids distinctly convolute, with inner margins covered by robust setae ( Fig. 133 View FIGURES 133–143 ). Apices of styloids sharp. Valvula II with characteristic bulbous structure and with sharp process near apex. Apex rounded ( Fig. 134 View FIGURES 133–143 ).

Measurements (in mm, male in parentheses): Body length: 21.3–21.9 (18.6–19.1); maximum width of abdomen: 4.9–5.3 (4.6–5.0); head length: 4.1–4.5 (3.4–3.5); head width: 2.1–2.2 (2.2–2.4); length of anteocular part: 2.1–2.6 (1.8–2.0); length of postocular part: 1.1–1.3 (0.5–0.6); length of synthlipsis: 1.2 (0.8–0.9); interocellar distance: 0.4–0.5 (0.3); length of antennal segments I:II:III:IV: 1.6–1.8 (1.5): 3.3–3.4 (3.3): 2.4–2.7 (2.5): 2.1 (missing); length of visible labial segments I:II:III: 1.0–1.3 (0.9): 3.1–3.4 (2.4): 1.4–1.7 (1.4); maximum length of anterior pronotal lobe: 3.3–3.6 (2.6); maximum length of posterior pronotal lobe: 1.3–1.7 (2.0–2.1); maximum width of anterior pronotal lobe: 3.5 (2.4–2.5); maximum width of posterior pronotal lobe: 3.6–3.7 (3.8–3.9); length of scutellum: 1.6 (1.6–1.7); length of hemelytron: 1.5–1.8 (12.0–12.5).

Distribution: Australia (N.S. Wales, Queensland) (Map 13: red circles).

Comments: Females of this species are brachypterous ( Figs. 132 View FIGURE 132 , 158 View FIGURES 156–158 ), and they are distinctly larger than males ( Fig. 131 View FIGURE 131 ). The fossula spongiosa present on the middle tibia ( Figs. 159–163 View FIGURES 159–163 ) in both sexes is a unique character among all representatives of the genus Sirthenea .

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Reduviidae

Genus

Sirthenea

Loc

Sirthenea (Monogmus) laevicollis Horváth, 1909

Chłond, Dominik 2018
2018
Loc

Sirthenea (Monogmus) laevicollis Horváth, 1909 : 366

Horvath, G. 1909: 366
1909
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF