Idriella multiformispora Zhi.Y. Zhang, Y.F. Han & Z.Q. Liang, 2023
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.98.102816 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E667E26F-FDD5-5A71-8B8B-0C5497690C17 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Idriella multiformispora Zhi.Y. Zhang, Y.F. Han & Z.Q. Liang |
status |
sp. nov. |
Idriella multiformispora Zhi.Y. Zhang, Y.F. Han & Z.Q. Liang sp. nov.
Fig. 29 View Figure 29
Etymology.
Referring to the multiform conidia.
Type.
China: Jiangxi Province, Nanchang City, Nanchang People's Park 28°68'12"N, 115°91'35"E, soil, 13 Aug 2019, Z.Y. Zhang (HMAS 351880 holotype designated here, ex-type living culture CGMCC 3.20779 = GZUIFR 21.923) .
Description.
Culture characteristics (14 d at 25 °C): Colony on PDA 51 mm diam., grey (30F1) to dark green (30F4), felty, compact, margin entire to undulated; reverse dark green (30F4). Colony on MEA 27-30 mm diam., greenish-grey (30E2), flat, stellate striate with grey, margin entire to undulated; reverse dark green (30F4). Colony on OA 33-38 mm diam., greenish-grey (30E2), aerial mycelia dense, plicated, sectorisation, nearly round; reverse greenish-grey (30E2).
Hyphae branched, septate, hyaline, smooth, 1.0-4.0 μm diam. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells numerous, borne on hyphae or hyphal coil, erect, straight or flexuous, lageniform, 9.5-25.5 µm long, 1.0-3.0 µm wide at the base, apex inflated or globose and 1.0-2.5 µm diam. Conidia lunate, sometimes acerose, pointed at each end, non-septate, smooth-walled, colourless, 8.5-13.5 × 1.0-2.0 µm (av. 11.6 × 1.7 μm, n = 50). Chlamydospores are borne on hyphae, moniliform or branched, 1-2-septate, brown, 12.5-22.5 × 6.5-11.5 µm (av. 21.4 × 10.5 μm, n = 50). Sexual morph unknown.
Additional specimens examined.
China: Jiangxi Province, Nanchang City, Qianhu Campus of Nanchang University 28°65'68"N, 115°80'12"E, soil, 13 Aug 2019, Z.Y. Zhang, GZUIFR 21.924, ibid., GZUIFR 21.925 .
Notes.
According to Castañeda-Ruiz and Kendrick (1991), Idriella multiformispora and I. acerosa share similarities in terms of their lunate conidia and moniliform or branched chlamydospores. While introducing I. acerosa , Castañeda-Ruiz and Kendrick (1991) also noted that it bears a resemblance to I. desertorum . However, molecular data on I. acerosa are not available. Later, Hernández-Restrepo et al. (2016) established the genus Neoidriella , based on the molecular analysis of I. desertorum and removed it from the genus Idriella as the type species. In this study, I. multiformispora was phylogenetically categorised within the genus Idriella (Fig. 27 View Figure 27 ). Morphologically, I. multiformispora can be differentiated from I. acerosa by its fewer septate chlamydospores ( Castañeda-Ruiz and Kendrick in 1991).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |