Ruidocollaris Liu, 1993
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.276329 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6197802 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E74587CC-2801-FFD0-FF50-FC256BE2FDE0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ruidocollaris Liu, 1993 |
status |
|
Type species: Sympaestria truncatolobata Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1878. Ruidocollaris Liu, 1993 , in Huang, Animals of Longqi Mountain.: 54.
Diagnosis. Each femoral genicular lobe round, without any spines; tegmen without distinct Costa vein; male tympanal area with two very much swollen diagonal veins, the posterior one about one-half as long as the anterior one; male stridulatory vein cambered, simple, with dense fine teeth ( Figs. 21–30 View FIGURES 21 – 24 View FIGURES 25 – 28 View FIGURES 29 – 30 ); male tenth abdominal tergum not produced ( Figs. 31–47 View FIGURES 31 – 39 View FIGURES 40 – 47 ); male subgenital plate with short styli ( Figs. 58–66 View FIGURES 58 – 66 ); female ovipositor with an abrupt sharp tip, rugose on the sides and both apical margins ( Figs. 67–74 View FIGURES 67 – 72 View FIGURES 73 – 74 ).
Ruidocollaris distinctly differs from Tapiena Bolívar, 1906 by absence of the punctures in the head, pronotum and wings, although it most closely resembles Tapiena in the hind genicular lobes without spine and the shape of male stridulatory area ( Liu & Kang 2010). The genus also distinctly differs from Holochlora Stȁl ( Liu et al. 2008) and Sinochlora Tinkham ( Liu & Kang 2007b) by the absence of spines at each genicular lobe, structure of male tenth abdominal tergum and female apex, although it resembles them in the male subgenital plate possessing the short styli. Ruidocollaris is distinctly dissimilar to the genus Sympaestria in absence of the feebly convex pronotal disk, perpendicularly inserted paranota, the stiff, shell-like tegmen, the proximal fork of tegminal Rs running directly into the M vein, and the special middle sharp spine on genicular lobe of femur. It distinctly differs from Liotrachela by the unarmed geniculations of each femur.
Description. Head ovoid, occiput convex and smooth. Fastigium verticis well-produced, dorsally sulcate, distinctly narrower than first segment of antenna, with apex approximately rounded. Fastigium frontis inversely ovoid; dorsal apex slightly narrower than fastigium verticis, separated by a distinct gap. Compound eyes semi-spherical, ventral margin extending over ventral margin of antennal scrobe. Antenna thread-like, long and breakable. Pronotal disc smooth, with distinct longitudinal median line; median groove distinct, “U”- shaped, lying before middle; anterior margin approximately straight, posterior margin rounded and various, lateral margin outspreading backwards; paranota generally deeper than long, rarely as high as long; humeral sinus distinct. Anterior coxae armed. Each femur with distinct ventro-anterior spinules. Anterior tibiae dorsally sulcate, widened at and abruptly constricted below tympana. Outer tympanum open, oval, membranous; inner tympanum conchate. Each tibia usually with dorsal spinules on both margins. Tegmen well developed, stridulatory file on underside of left tegmen not elevated above wing plane ( Figs. 1–9 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ); mirror of right tegmen irregular quadrangular ( Figs. 10–18 View FIGURES 10 – 18, 20 , 20).
Male terminalia ( Figs. 31–47 View FIGURES 31 – 39 View FIGURES 40 – 47 ). Tenth abdominal tergum normal, slightly concave in middle. Epiproct triangular, with apex obtuse. Cerci simple, apex pointed or not ( Figs. 49–57 View FIGURES 49 – 57 ). Subgenital plate robust, with emargination at the apex; with styli ( Figs. 58–66 View FIGURES 58 – 66 ). Male phallic organ membranous.
Female terminalia ( Figs. 67–74 View FIGURES 67 – 72 View FIGURES 73 – 74 ). Tenth abdominal tergum not produced, with dorso-medial groove; posterior margin obtusely emarginated. Epiproct usually wider than long, about semicircular. Cerci short, slightly curved, uneven; gradually tapering into pointed apex. Subgenital plate generally triangular (Figs. 75– 82). Ovipositor robust, wide; lateral surface with very conspicuous transverse convex fold at base; with some sharp dark serrate lines in distal region; both margins serrate ( Figs. 67–74 View FIGURES 67 – 72 View FIGURES 73 – 74 ).
Distribution ( Figs. 96–99 View FIGURE 96 View FIGURE 97 View FIGURE 98 View FIGURE 99 ). Type species R. truncatolobata is widespread in southeastern Asia, southern China, and Japan ( Fig. 96 View FIGURE 96 ). Most species of Ruidocollaris are distributed in Oriental region, and eight species are endemic in the south of China. R. convexipennis (Caudell) widely spread in the south of China except Tibet and Hainan Island ( Fig. 97 View FIGURE 97 ). R. rubescens sp. nov. is widespread in the south of China including the low altitude of Tibet ( Fig. 98 View FIGURE 98 ). R. obscura Liu is distributed in the south of China except Tibet, Hainan and Taiwan Island ( Fig. 98 View FIGURE 98 ). Three species, R. longicaudalis sp. nov., R. apennis sp. nov., R. parapennis sp. nov., are endemic to low altitude of Tibet ( Fig. 99 View FIGURE 99 ). R. latilobalis sp. nov. is endemic to Guangdong Province. R. ferruginescens sp. nov. is endemic to Guangxi Province ( Fig. 99 View FIGURE 99 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Ruidocollaris Liu, 1993
Liu, Chun-Xiang & Kang, Le 2010 |
Holochlora Stȁl ( Liu et al. 2008 )
Stal (Liu et al. 2008 |
Tapiena Bolívar, 1906
Bolivar 1906 |