Asprothrips atermaculosus, Wang, Zhaohong & Tong, Xiaoli, 2017

Wang, Zhaohong & Tong, Xiaoli, 2017, Variation in colour markings of an unusual new Asprothrips species from China (Thysanoptera, Thripidae), ZooKeys 716, pp. 19-28 : 21-23

Asprothrips atermaculosus sp. n. Figs 2-5, 6-12, 13-16

Material examined.

Holotype female (in SCAU): CHINA, Hunan province, Chaling County, Yunyangshan National Forest Park (26°47'58"N, 113°30'18"E, alt. 300m), collected from leaves of Lophatherum gracile ( Poaceae ), 8.viii.2017, leg. Zhaohong Wang.

Paratypes (in SCAU): 20 females, 25 males, taken with holotype. Fujian province, Sanming City, Sanyuan National Forest Park (26°10'N, 117°28'E, alt. 200m), 21 females and 31 males from leaves of Lophatherum gracile ( Poaceae ), 24.viii.2017, leg. Zhaohong Wang. Hunan province, Hengyang City, Mt. Hengshan (26°16'22"N, 112°42'22"E, alt. 530m), 2 females, collected from L. gracile ( Poaceae ), 6.viii.2017, leg. Zhaohong Wang.

Diagnosis.

Female body bicoloured, head, pronotum and antennal segments I–II brown; abdomen white except for the intra-population variation in the number and size of brown markings on the abdominal tergites I–VIII; fore wing white with two dark brown bands and the surface uniformly covered with microtrichia. Male body is similar to female in structure and colour pattern, but antennae white or yellowish white and the paired brown markings exist only in abdominal tergites I–II and VI; abdominal sternites III–VIII each with a small and oval pore plates.

Description.

Female (macropterous) (Fig. 2). Body bicoloured, dark brown and white; head and pronotum dark brown; antennal segment I pale brown, II dark brown, III–VIII white (Fig. 7); pterothorax and all legs white; fore wing white with two dark brown bands submedially and apically (Fig. 9); abdomen white except for tergites I–II and VI stably with the paired dark brown markings laterally, but those on tergites III–V and VII–VIII are variable individually in numbers and size within the same population as showed as figures 3-4, tergite IX white with a pale brown tint and X white.

Head (Fig. 6) approximately 2.0 times as wide as long; two pairs of minute ocellar setae present, pair II situated at middle between anterior ocellus and compound eye, pair III arising near anterior margin of posterior ocelli within ocellar triangle; four pairs of minute postocular setae present, first pair below the hind ocelli, second and third one near the compound eyes and fourth pair near the cheeks; vertex between eyes including ocellar triangle irregularly reticulate, occipital region of vertex reticulate with transverse dotted lines and internal granules within the reticules; cheeks serrated. Mouth cone short and rounded; maxillary palps three-segmented. Antennae 8-segmented (Fig. 7), antennal segment II large and globular with ridges on striae, III with a pedicel, III and IV each with a forked sense cone, V with a short simple outer sense cone, VI with three sense cones, inner one longest arising medially, reaching apex of segment VIII; microtrichia rows present on segments III–VI, III–V with three rows, VI with sparse microtrichia.

Pronotum (Fig. 6) approximately 2.0 times as wide as long, irregularly reticulate with numerous internal granules within the reticules; dorsal surface covered with approximately 26-32 short discal setae and four pairs of posteromarginal setae; ferna complete and narrower at middle. Mesonotum (Fig. 11) with transverse anastomosing striae without internal wrinkles or granules within the reticules, a pair of campaniform sensilla on anterior fourth, median setal pair situated submedially. Metanotum (Fig. 11) reticulate medially without granules within the reticules, median setae far back from anterior margin, campaniform sensilla present or absent. Metafurca bearing two lyre-shaped anterior arms extending into the mesothorax (Fig. 12). Fore wing uniformly covered with microtrichia (Fig. 9); fore wing apex with two long terminal setae, costa with 14-15 setae, first vein with 5-6 proximal and two distal setae, second vein with 4-5 setae; main posterior fringe hairs weakly wavy. Legs reticulate weakly; fore and mid tarsi 2-segmented, hind tarsus one-segmented; Hind tibiae with two apical stout setae.

Abdominal tergites I–VII smooth medially between setal pair S2, with transverse sculpture lines bearing microtrichia laterally; S1 setae (median pair) on abdominal tergites II to VII small, the distance between their basal pores much greater than their length; paired campaniform sensilla between setae S1 and S2, much closer to S2 on tergites II–VII (Fig. 13); VIII–IX entirely covered with transverse sculpture bearing microtrichia except for groove medially; VIII with posterior marginal comb of small microtrichia only at middle; posterior margin of IX medially with a pair of fine and pointed setae directed medially (Fig. 14); tergite X without longitudinal dorsal split. Abdominal sternites II–VII weakly reticulate; II with one pair of setae and III–VII each with three pairs on posterior margin.

Measurements (holotype female in microns). Total distended body length 960. Head length (width) 63 (122); eye length (width) 47 (32). Pronotum length (width) 79 (147). Length of antenna 182; length (width) of antennal segments I 15 (20), II 22 (24), III 30 (14), IV 30 (13), V 26 (13), VI 36 (12), VII 10 (4) and VIII 13 (3). Fore wing length 1250.

Male (macropterous) (Fig. 3). Similar to female in structure and colour except for following characters: antennal segments I–II yellowish white (Fig. 8); fore wing with two brown bands submedially and apically, but the apical one much shorter than that of the female (Fig. 10); the paired brown markings exist only in abdominal tergites I–II and VI and without any markings on other tergites (Figs 3, 15); abdominal sternites III–VIII each with a small and oval pore plates (Fig. 16).

Measurements (paratype male in microns). Total distended body length 840. Head length (width) 60 (110); eye length (width) 50 (32). Pronotum length (width) 76 (130). Length of antenna 173; length (width) of antennal segments I 15 (19), II 22 (22), III 30 (12), IV 30 (11), V 26 (12), VI 31 (11), VII 9 (4) and VIII 10 (3). Fore wing length 1090.

Etymology.

The species name is an arbitrary combination of two Latin adjective, “ater” meaning black, and “maculosus” meaning spotted or markings, in reference to the abdominal tergites with many dark brown markings.

Distribution.

China (Hunan, Fujian).

Remarks.

This species can be distinguished from other members of the genus Asprothrips by the variable number and size of brown markings on the abdominal tergites (Figs 2-5). These dark brown markings are obviously not subintegumental pigment because they are present on specimens before and after treatment with NaOH. Intraspecific variation in colour and structure within and between populations is com mon in Thysanoptera ( Mound 2005b). Historically, it was not unusual for thrips taxonomists to describe one species under many different names because of failure to recognise such phenotypic plasticity ( Mound 2005a). For example, Ecacanthothrips tibialis (Ashmead) had been given 18 different names ( Palmer and Mound 1978). Similarly, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande), the Western flower thrips, has been reported to exist in three colour morphs, with light, dark, and bicoloured forms from different populations or seasons, resulting in at least 16 described species being placed as synonyms of F. occidentalis ( Mound and Marullo 1996). Environmental conditions are probably of importance in determining such colour differences ( Mound 2005a, b). However, A. atermaculosus is unusual because the brown markings on III–V and VII–VIII of females vary in number and size within the same population. In this study, we collected mainly at Chaling (Hunan province) and Sanming (Fujian province) respectively, these two localities are approximately 400 km apart. In “Chaling” population, there are eight colour patterns of brown markings on tergites III–V in female (Fig. 5), whereas in the “Sanming” population there are 12 kinds of brown markings (Fig. 4). Despite this, the colour morph with paired markings on tergites I–VIII is dominant and found in both populations. Furthermore, the paired brown markings are stable in their presence on tergites I–II and VI in the sexes. Therefore, much is yet to be learnt about the biological significance of the variation in colour markings of this new species. Such variation also occurs in the female of A. bimaculatus Michel & Ryckewaert, which has a pair of dark brown markings on abdominal tergite VI ( Michel and Ryckewaert 2014a, b), but in Chinese specimens, these markings are faded and only faintly visible ( Tong et al. 2016).