Enicospilus multidens Chiu, 1954
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.990.55542 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7B73642C-278D-40F8-9091-B26213C9A704 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E8056006-30A0-5ABC-B8EE-49E72475A4D8 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Enicospilus multidens Chiu, 1954 |
status |
stat. rev. |
Enicospilus multidens Chiu, 1954 stat. rev. Figure 29 View Figure 29
Enicospilus multidens Chiu, 1954: 75; HT ♀ from Japan, TARI, examined; stat. rev.
Specimens examined.
Total of 30 specimens (14♀♀16♂♂): Japan (14♀♀16♂♂).
Type series: HT ♀ of Enicospilus multidens Chiu, 1954, Minoh, Ōsaka, Kinki, JAPAN, 20.VII.1918, N. Tosawa leg. (TARI).
Distribution.
Eastern Palaearctic region ( Chiu 1954; present study); new to the Oriental region; this is a predominantly Eastern Palaearctic species.
JAPAN: [ Hokkaidô]*; [ Tôhoku] Aomori*; [Hokuriku] Niigata*; [ Kantô-Kôshin] Gunma*, Nagano*, Yamanashi*, and Saitama*; [ Tôkai] Shizuoka* and Mie*; [Kinki] Ōsaka ( Chiu 1954; present study) and Hyôgo *; [ Chûgoku] Tottori ( Chiu 1954), Shimane* and Hiroshima*; [Shikoku] Ehime* and Kôchi *; [ Kyûshû] Kumamoto*; [ Ryûkyûs] Kagoshima*. *New records.
Bionomics.
Unknown.
Differential diagnosis.
In some ichneumonid collections, this species has been confused with E. shikokuensis . However, E. multidens stat. rev. can be distinguished from E. shikokuensis by shallow concavity of proximal outer mandibular surface (Fig. 29B, D View Figure 29 ) (proximal outer mandibular surface with very wide subtriangular concavity in E. shikokuensis , as in Fig. 44B, D View Figure 44 ); separated proximal and distal sclerites (Fig. 29F View Figure 29 ) (proximal and distal sclerites usually confluent, as in Figs 7B View Figure 7 , 44F View Figure 44 , or rarely separated, as in Fig. 7A View Figure 7 , in E. shikokuensis ); stouter, shorter, and evenly narrowed mandible (Fig. 29B, D View Figure 29 ) (mandible much longer, slender, proximally strongly narrowed, and apical 0.7 parallel-sided in E. shikokuensis , as in Fig. 44B, D View Figure 44 ); narrower lower face (Fig. 29B View Figure 29 ) (lower face wider in E. shikokuensis , as in Fig. 44B View Figure 44 ), etc.
This species is also similar to E. combustus , and Uchida (1955) synonymised E. multidens stat. rev. under E. combustus . However, they are morphologically easily distinguished by body colour pattern (i.e., body entirely testaceous in E. multidens stat. rev., as in Fig. 29A View Figure 29 , but body with black marks in E. combustus , as in Fig. 13A View Figure 13 ), and DNA barcodes also separate them. Hence, we revise the status of E. multidens stat. rev. as a valid species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Enicospilus multidens Chiu, 1954
Shimizu, So, Broad, Gavin R. & Maeto, Kaoru 2020 |
Enicospilus multidens
Chiu 1954 |